FT_CHADBOURNE_3D

Nomenclature

AI
BRIT
BVW
DIFFND
DLRMR
DPHI
DTC
EI**
ERHO
LAMBDA
LAMDA_RHO
MU
MURHO
NPHI
PE*
PHIE
PHIT
PR
RATIOND
RHOB
RLM
SI
SWE
SWT
U_MAA
VELC
VELS
VOL_**
VPVS
YOUNG_MOD

Ft/S*Gm/C3
V/V
V/V
GPA*Gm/C3
V/V
US/F
Ft/S*Gm/C3
GPA*Gm/C3
GPA
GPA*Gm/C3
GPA
GPA*Gm/C3
V/V
Barns/Electron
V/V
V/V
Gm/C3
Ft/S*GmC3
V/V
V/V
Barns/C3
Ft/S
Ft/S
V/V
6Psi

Acoustic Impedance
Brittleness (Function of Youngs Modulus and PR)
Bulk Volume Water (PHIE * SWE)
Difference NPHI and DPHI
Difference LambdaRHO MuRHO
Density Porosity
Compressional Interval Travel Time
Elastic Impedance at ** Degrees
Youngs Modulus * RHOB (Older slides used RHOYM instead of ERHO)
Incompressibility (Lame)
Incompressibility attributes
Rigidity (shear modulus)
Rigidity attributes
Neutron Porosity
Photo Electric Effect
Effective Porosity
Total Porosity
Poissons Ratio
Ratio of NPHI to DPHI
Bulk Density
Ratio of incompressibility to rigidity
Shear Impedance
Effective Water Saturation (Shaly-Sand model)
Total Water Saturation (Shaly-Sand model)
Apparent Matrix Volumetric Cross Section
Compressional velocity
Shear velocity
Volumes of various minerals (from MultiMin models)
Ratio of VELC and VELS
Dynamic Youngs Modulus

Lame Constants
LMR
analysis

Carbonates

Cemented
Sand

Mu Rho

Gas
Sand

Infers Rigidity
(Lithology)

Wet
Sand

Shale

Lambda Rho
Infers Incompressibility (Fluid)

Lame Constants
LMR
analysis

2.6
Shales

Sandstone Line

Lambda/Mu

Wet
Sands

Carbonates

Porous Gas
Sands

.5

-20

Lambda Mu Difference

60

REFERENCES

Passey, Q.R., S. Creaney, J.B. Kulla, F.J. Moretti, and J.D. Stroud, 1990, A practical model for
organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs: AAPG Bulletin, v. 74, p. 1777-1794.
Krief, M., Garat, J., Stellingwerff, J. and Ventre, J., 1990, A petrophysical interpretation using the
velocities of P and S waves (full-waveform sonic): The Log Analyst, 355-369.
The Magic of Lam, Bill Goodway, SEG 2009 Lecture
Rick Rickman, Mike Mullen, etal. A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design
Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale: SPE 115258

Well Location

FCOLU_01_86

FCOLU_01_86: PR vs AI

FCOLU_01_86: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_01_86: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_01_86: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_08_27

FCOLU_08_27: PR vs AI

FCOLU_08_27: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_08_27: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_08_27: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_08_30

FCOLU_08_30: PR vs AI

FCOLU_08_30: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_08_30: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_08_30: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_08_31

FCOLU_08_31: PR vs AI

FCOLU_08_31: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_08_31: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_08_31: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_26_18

FCOLU_26_18: AI vs PR

FCOLU_26_18: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_26_18: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_26_18: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_51_32

FCOLU_51_32: PR vs AI

FCOLU_51_32: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_51_32: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_51_32: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_A_107

FCOLU_A_107: PR vs AI

FCOLU_A_107: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_A_107: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_A_107: PR vs ERHO

FCOLU_A_110

FCOLU_A_110: PR vs AI

FCOLU_A_110: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

FCOLU_A_110: DLRMR vs RLM

FCOLU_A_110: PR vs ERHO

Theodore_1

Theodore_1: PR vs AI

Theodore_1: Lambda_Rho vs Mu_Rho

Theodore_1: DLRMR vs RLM

Theodore_1: PR vs ERHO