Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ANALYSIS
Utility
Utility means the satisfaction obtained from the
Measurement of Utility
There are two approaches by which utility
can be measured:
Cardinal utility approach: Cardinal
approach is based on Marshallian school of
thought. It has come out with a unit called
util to measure the utility. Util reveals how
much of money a consumer is willing to pay
for a given unit of product.
Measurement of Utility
Ordinal utility approach: This approach is
assumptions.
Consumers are rational
Consumers always prefer more quantity
Consumers are ready to make tradeoffs
Diminishing marginal rate of substitution
Relationship between
Marginal .
Utility and Total
Quantity
Utility of a Product Total Utility Marginal
Consumed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Utility
0
5
8
10
10
9
7
0
5
3
2
0
-1
-2
Total Utility
200
150
100
50
0
1
10 11
($) M U
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
11
Q
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
($) TU
0
40
85
120
140
150
157
160
160
155
145
($) MU
40
45
35
20
10
7
3
0
-5
-10
145
Relationship between
Marginal .
Utility and Total
Derivation of Total Utility and Marginal Utility
Utility
Applications of diminishing
marginal utility
Equimarginal Utility
We assume that each consumer maximizes
Equimarginal Principle
Equimarginal Principle: The fundamental
Equimarginal Utility
Law of equimarginal utility states that the
MUE =
=
Px
Py
Equimarginal Utility
A consumer continues buying a product till its
MUI
40
45
35
20
10
7
3
0
PI
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Indifference Curve
X1
U1
0
X2
Indifference Curves
Slope = Change in Y/Change in X
= MUx/MUy
U4
U3
U2
U1
O
Assumption of Indifference
Curve Analysis
Rationality
Utility is ordinal
Consistency &Transitivity
Convexity (Diminishing MRS)
Budget Line
A budget line is a line drawn in a
Y
I/Py
Budget Line
Income = Px .Qx + Py. Qy
Slope = Px/Py
X
O
I/Px
Quantity of
goods X
Consumed
Quantity of
goods Y
Consumed
MRS of X to
Y
20
15
----
20
11
4:1
20
3:1
20
2:1
20
1:1
X
1
(MRS)
Constant &
downward sloping
X2
point representing
the "right" mix of
consumption
X
1
U2
U1
X2
Consumer Equilibrium
Consumer Equilibrium
Can reach point D,
but prefer A to D
Why?
X1
B
D
0
U1
U2
X2
U3
Consumer Equilibrium
X1
B
D
0
U1
U2
X2
U3
So, point A is
clearly is
optimal, given
budget, prices,
tastes &
preferences.
Income-Consumption Curve
Optimal consumption of
X1, X2 as I changes
X
1
A
U3
U1
I1
I2
I3
U2
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
Income
Consumptio
n Curve
A
U3
U1
I1
D1 D2
A
I2
D3
I3
U2
X2
P2
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
Income
Income
Consumptio
Consumptio
nn Curve
Curve
U2
U1
U0
I1
I2
I3
X2
P2
X2
=> As income
increases, we can
see Demand for
inferior good
decreasing, given
Ps
Consumer Surplus
The difference between what a consumer is
Consumer Surplus
Qty. Willing Actual Consumer Surplus =
to pay pay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Actual pay
27 12 = 15
Consumer Surplus
P
Price
D
0
Qx
any ?
Consumer Surplus
Consumer Surplus = Prepared to pay
actual pay
Consumer Surplus = Total Utility
amount spent
Consumer Surplus = Total utility P* Qd
Consumer Surplus
Qty Willing Actual
to pay pay
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
any ?
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
Income
Consumptio
n Curve
A
U3
U1
I1
D1
A
I2
I3
U2
X2
P2
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
Income
Consumptio
n Curve
A
U3
U1
I1
D1 D2
A
I2
I3
U2
X2
P2
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
Income
Consumptio
n Curve
A
U3
U1
I1
D1 D2
A
I2
D3
I3
U2
X2
P2
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
U0
I1
I2
I3
X2
As income increases,
outlays on goods, say X2
here, actually decrease
Occurs typically over
some, not the entire,
range of consumption
Note shapes of
indifference curves
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
U2
U1
U0
I1
I2
I3
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
U2
U1
U0
I1
I2
I3
X2
Income-Consumption Curve
X
1
Income
Income
Consumptio
Consumptio
nn Curve
Curve
U2
U1
U0
I1
I2
I3
X2
P2
X2
=> As income
increases, we can
see Demand for
inferior good
decreasing, given
Ps