Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Appraise Septage
Management Projects
By: Dave Robbins,
BeSecure
Objecti
ve
Reviewers should strive to
provide:
How to
evaluate
projects
Toolkits
Case studies
Pre-application meetings
Formal application presentations
Technical
Pitfalls
Over-reliance on technical
assertions by the applicant.
Reviewers should request:
Design reports that are fully documented
Case studies and examples of successful
applications
especially for proprietary equipment
Documentation for waste strength and
volume
Warranties for process equipment
Effluent quality guarantees by equipment
Never assume the information is
provider
correct
just because it is presented in
or engineer
Technical
Pitfalls
Social
Pitfalls
Failure to verify social
acceptability. Reviewers
should
Letters request:
of support for projects from
stakeholders,
LGU, WD and regional officials
Documentation of stakeholder
involvement
Reports from public hearings and
meetings
Financial
Pitfalls
Failure to verify financial
viability. Reviewers should
verify:
Documented cost for COPEX and OPEX
Tariff and rate study (affordability)
Projections that reflect inflation,
community growth
Reuse and resource recovery options fully
explored
What happens to the collected money
(tariffs)?
Ring fencing and
transparency
Performing
Financial review
Financial
Pitfalls
Projections
2.5Pesos
45Pesos
5%
2%
3.8%
5%
9cubic meters
Year 1
Number of homes
Number of
commercial/institutional
Daily flow (cubic meters per
day)
100Pesos
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
6,300
6,615
6,946
7,293
7,658
8,041
8,443
8,865
9,308
9,773
700
714
728
743
758
773
788
804
820
837
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
13
13