Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Validation of a
Worktext in
Advanced Statistics
Statement of the Problem
2. What is the level of acceptability of the
1. What in
worktext is terms
the validity
of: of the developed
worktext terms of:
a. objectives,
a. goals/objectives,
b. content organization,
b. procedure
c. sub-topics, and methodology,
d.
c. usefulness,
activities, and
e.
d. effectiveness,
evaluative exercise?
f. illustrations/diagrams, and
g. evaluative exercise?
Scope and Delimitations
The topics included in the worktextare based from the
course outline given by DepEd.
Experts in the field of statistics ascertained its content
validity.
Statistics teachers in Juan G. Macaraeg National High
Shool, Tayug National High School, Mangaldan
National High School and UrdanetaCity National High
School for teacher acceptability of the worktext, while
Special Science Class of JGMNHS students were
utilized for students’ acceptability.
Methodology
Research Design
Subjects of the Study
Data Gathering Instrument
BACK
Subjects of the Study
The topics included in the worktextare based from the
course outline given by DepEd.
Subjects of the Study
Experts in the field of statistics will ascertain its content
validity.
Subjects of the Study
Statistics teachers from Juan G. Macaraeg National
High Shool, Tayug National High School, Mangaldan
National High School and UrdanetaCity National High
School for teacher acceptability of the worktext, while
Special Science Class of JGMNHS students were
utilized for students’ acceptability.
Data Gathering
Instrument
Course Outline in
Advanced Statistics
Content Validity
by Experts
Level of Acceptability
a.By teacher-respondents
b.By student-respondents
Content Validity
Level of Acceptability
Summary of Findings
Content Validity
Level of Acceptability
LevelThe of Acceptability
level of acceptability
content validity of each of each chapter
chapter of
of the
Based
the on the questionnaire
developed
developed worktext
worktext answered
to tothe by students, the level
the expert-respondents,
teacher evaluators,
ofwith
acceptability
respect
respect of each
toto chapter ofobjectives,
the developed
thethe objectives, worktext
content
sub-topics,
with regards to the objectives, content organizations,
organizations,
activities, and procedure
evaluative and
exercises methodology,
procedure and methodology, usefulness, effectiveness,
ranges from
usefulness,
highly valid
illustrations/ effectiveness,
drawings/diagrams, illustrations/drawings/
to very highly valid. The grand
and evaluative mean
exercises
isdiagrams,
ofverythehigh. and evaluative
evaluators’
The grand rating
mean ofexercises is very
istheequivalent
evaluators’ to high.
4.03
rating is
The
which
4.70 grand meantheofworktext
describe
which describe the worktext
the evaluators’ as rating
as “Highly“Very isHighly
Valid”.4.63
which describe the worktext as “Very Highly
Acceptable”.
Acceptable”.
Conclusions
The chapters in the developed
worktext are highly valid.
The chapters in the developed
worktext are very highly
acceptable. In general, teachers
and students recognized the
appropriateness of the material.
Recommendations