Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CONTENTS
Field theory
Kurt Lewins Life Sketch
Lewins Field Theory
Edward Chase Tolmans Life Sketch
Tolmans Cognitive Field theory
FIELD THEORY
Field theory in psychology bears some relation to the notions of
fields in physics,
Field theory in psychology consider that an organism is affected
by factors in the field which surrounds it.
Proposed that behavior is the result of the individual and the
environment.
Had a major impact on social psychology
KURT LEWIN
Life Sketch (1890-1947)
CONTINUATION.
From the gestaltist, Lewin borrowed the concept of a field. This
was not the isomorphic brain field which they stressed, but an
environmental field containing one or more persons.
When Hitler came to power, Lewin left Germany and came to
the United States. He became a professor at Cornell University
from 1933-1935 and then was at the University of Iowa Child
Welfare Station for ten years.
In 1945 he was appointed professor and Director of the
Research Center for Group Dynamics at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology until hid untimely death the following year
at the age of 56.
LEWINS SYSTEM
Lewin considered to be a topological and vectoral psychology.
Topology- is a form of geometry in which the concepts of inside,
outside, and boundary are used.
However, his analogy to topology is rather superficial
Vectoral- describe resolution of forces
usually represented by an arrow
the length referring to the degree of force and the direction
allowing for the line of application.
Foreign bull - the facts that existed outside the life space.
The life space existed for the individual, and the individual
existed within the life space.
life space
quasi-physical, quasi-social, and quasi- conceptual.
Psychological construct,
one which was designed
to account for all the
events that influenced a
person at the time of
examination.
CONTINUATION
Life space could be divided into regions which were divided by
boundaries. Each region might constitute a psychological fact
was not merely an observable thing like a table instead they
could be a social or intellectual event or something simply
inferred.
ce
T
m
pr
+
G
DIMENSIONS OF BOUNDARIES
nearness-remoteness- In this figure establishing a practice and
becoming a physician as the goal were near, while college was
a more remote region.
firmness-weakness- passing an examination could be a difficult
task before allowing the person to move into the next region,
that of medical school. The number of regions in the life space
was determined by the number of facts that existed at any
particular time.
THE PERSON
The person always existed in the life space and was usually designated by the letter P.
Like the life space it could be subdivided into interconnected and interdependent units as
indicated in the diagram below.
Motoric regions
Peripheral stratum
of the inner region
Central
stratum of
the inner
region
HODOLOGICAL SPACE
hodos meaning pathway.
For Lewin, the characteristics of a given path varied according
to the situation, and the direction depended on the properties of
the entire field.
Through Locomotion one might move from one region to another
according to a given pathway.
Ex. A college teacher might move from the region of instructor
through assistant and associative professor and finally to the
region of full professor.
LEVELS OF REALITY
Thus far we considered only a two- dimensional life space. This
was what Lewin called the level of reality. But there were levels
if irreality in which imaginary locomotion might take place.
The figure represents the present and the future. Also, the two levels of reality was also
represented. The sequences of events started from left to right. The two levels of reality
came closer as one extended to the future. There was less differences between reality
and irreality as something planned was more nearly achieved.
In the first stage, Present the plan made the person nearer to the goal on the irreality
dimension but in the final stage.
Future reality and irreality were the same. The goal was reached in thought and act.
MOTIVATION
Lewins concept of motivation, which perhaps the crux of his
theories and the focus of most of its research, involved a
number of constructs;
Energy
Tension
Need
Valence
Force or Vector
Energy
As in other theorist, Psychoanalysis for example. Lewin considered
a person as a complex energy system, and like Freud, he felt the
energy performed psychological work and was psychic rather than
physical.
Tension
simply stated, tension was a state of disequilibrium between a person
and the environment. It arose when there was lack of balance the forces in
his psychological environment.
One of the earliest examples to demonstrate tension and its reduction
was found in an experiment by Zeigarnik. She presumed that first , tension
were not relieved as would ordinarily occur if the task were completed, the
presence of tension would result in greater recall of the incomplete tasks.
The achievement of a goal relieved the tension.
Needs
Needs gave rise to tension. Although Lewin preferred to keep his system of a purely
psychological level he did allow physiological conditions such as hunger, thirst and sex
might arouse tension, but there were other purely psychological needs. The desire to do
something, such as completing a task, could constitute a need.
A need was the result of some inner state in the tension system of a person, and it
was general. A quasi need was a more specific intention, such as watching a particular
TV show or a special restaurant.
Valence
referred to the particular attractiveness or repulsion of an object in the life space to
which we were attracted had positive valences and were indicated by a + sign. The
negative ones were indicated by a - sign. Some objects have no valence at all.
A person would tend to move through his or her life space in the direction of
positive valence. By contrast, those objects in a region in life space which
the person moved away from had negative valences.
Life space may contain several regions likewise with valences existing at the
same time.
Ex. Two positive valences adient-adient conflict
Two negative valences avoidance-avoidance conflict
In moving through the life space toward a region with a positive valence one
might encounter a barrier, that is some object or event that obstructed the
movement. In this instances, it was possible for the barrier that is some
object or event that obstructed the movement.
valence
VECTORS OR FORCES
Force or vector constituted the push which directed a person toward a goal. The force
might be directed toward or away from the object and was correlated with the objects
valence. Force was not the same as tension for it was an aspect of the psychological
environment.
P
Three properties:
Direction, as toward or away from an object
Point of contact
The longer the line, the greater the strength of the vector. In a conflcit situation there were two
opposing vectors.
P
CONFLICT
Approach-approach conflict the person
is placed in a situation in which a choice
must be made between two objects or
conditions both of which have equal
positive valence (=) and whose vectors
are pushing the person in opposite
directions.
Example: while dining at a restaurant a
person might have to choose either
chicken or steak, both of which are
equally desirable
DIFFERENTIATION
Both Life space and inner-personal regions became more differentiated through time.
The adult had many more inner tensions system as well as more possible life space
regions. If a person regressed in his behavior, his personality became differentiated.
Normal child has more cells, because she has developed more traits and behavioral
characteristics while the retarded child has fewer cells and the boundaries are firmer and
thicker indicates that there is less communication between the systems.
GROUP DYNAMICS
In his later years Lewin directed his attention to problems of social psychology.
Just as the person life space constituted the psychological field, the group and its
environment formed the social field. One of the fundamental characteristics of the social
field was the relative position of the members who constituted the group.
The group was subject to cohesive and disruptive forces. Disruptive forces arose out of
two strong barriers between members which hampered communication or out of conflict
between an individuals goals and those of the group.
When the relations between members were attractive, cohesive forces were operating, as
when the group was in a position to satisfy the needs of its members.
Lewin was not concerned with the mind body problem in the same manner
as the earlier theorist. In his system the problem took much more
sophisticated form. Nevertheless, the system was dualistic. Life space was
both physical and mental. A clear distinction between the two was difficult to
make.
CONTINUATION..
TOLMANS SYSTEM
LEARNING
COGNITIVE MAP
Tolman believed learning is an accumulation of these signs gestalt, and that they are then
configured, which is ongoing, also influences behavior in that in causes certain gestalts to
be selected or not, in relation to the individuals purpose or goals and other factors.
Experiments
The sunburst maze (after Tolman et al. 1946). Rats were initially trained on the maze
shown on the left. Rats were released at the starting point S and rewarded at the maze
end R. After training, the rats were tested on the maze shown on the right. The original
path out of the circular area was closed and forced the rats to select another arm. Rats
primarily selected arms oriented toward the original reward location.
Procedure
In their study 3 groups of rats had to find their way around a complex maze. At the end of
the maze there was a food box. Some groups of rats got to eat the food, some did not.
Group 1: Rewarded
Day 1 17: Every time they got to end, given food (i.e. reinforced).
Day 11 -17: Every time they got to end, given food (i.e. reinforced).
Group 3: No reward
In the experiment, they found that most of the rats picked a tunnel close to the original
reward tunnel that led in the direction of the food, instead of one close to the original
reward tunnel. The evidence supported the idea that rats navigate using a mental map
But if the rats were navigated through stimulus response, Tolman reasoned that they would
choose the tunnel regardless of where it led, since that was closest to the stimulus with the
pay-off.
Results
The delayed reward group learned the route on days 1 to 10 and formed a cognitive map
of the maze. They took longer to reach the end of the maze because there was no
motivation for them to perform. From day 11 onwards they had a motivation to perform
(i.e. food) and reached the end before the reward group.
CONCLUSION
This shows that between stimulus (the maze) and response (reaching the
end of the maze) a mediational process was occurring the rats were actively
processing information in their brains by mentally using their cognitive map.
ANALOGY
How to go to PUP Graduate School if your way is
blocked?
INTERVENING VARIABLES
consider
3. the behavior space was the space in which locomotion took place
toward the objects. It was very similar to Lewins life space. Objects in space
might attract or repel the organism. Thus, an object was perceived as it was
expected to be perceived.
Thank you!