Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project Management, the team composition, the BW Product and other lessons
learned
Wrap-up
Business case
Scope
Approach
Performance measures
Tool selection
Why??
4
1970s
1980s
Spreadsheets
1990s
2000s
Source: Fredrick Hoggren
Swedish Civil Economist Association
BI
DW (BW)
Operational Data
Store
(BW)
Transactions (i.e.
R/3)
Note
Develop
Products/
Services
Research Customer/
Market Needs
Conduct Basic Research
Design & Develop
Products / Services
Test-market Product
Develop Resource
Requirements Plan
Develop & Implement
Manufacturing Processes
Develop & Implement
Service Processes
Produce
Products/
Service
Perform
Procurement
Manage
Vendor/Contractor
Relationships
Order Materials/Supplies
Manage Inbound Logistics
Receive
Materials/Supplies
Manage Material/Supply
Quality
Manage Raw
Material/Feedstock
Inventory
Return Materials to
Vendors
Qualify & Select
Vendors/Contractors
Manage Engineering
Changes
Manage Product/Service
Quality
Obtain, Install, & Maintain
Production Equipment
Develop & Maintain
Production Procedures
Plan Capacity
Plan Production
Requirements
Schedule Production
Produce & Package
Products/Services
Perform Production
Control
Manage Work-In- Process
Inventory
Develop & Maintain Bills
of Material/Formulae
Manage
Logistics/
Distribution
Perform
Marketing/
Sales
Manage
Customer
Service
Equipment/Labor (Utilization)
Headcount
Process Steps (Number
Product Development (Cost)
Product Development (Cycle Time)
Product Introduction (Number)
Schedule/Cost Estimates (Accuracy)
Perform
Equipment/Labor (Utilization)
Headcount
Process Steps (Number)
Purchase Discounts (Value)
Purchase Order
(Volume/Frequency)
Purchase Price Variance (Value)
Purchasing (Cost)
Purchasing (Cycle Time)
Supplier Defects (Number)
Supplier Lead Time
Supplier On-time Delivery
Suppliers (Number)
Produce
10
Distribute
Products
Carriers (Number)
Dock-to-Stock (Cycle Time)
Equipment/Labor (Utilization)
Headcount
Inventory (Accuracy)
Inventory Finished Goods (Level/Value)
Inventory Finished Goods (Turnover)
Inventory Intransit (Level/Value)
Inventory Raw Materials (Level/Value)
Inventory Raw Materials (Turnover)
Picking (Accuracy)
Picking/Packing (Cycle Time)
Process Steps (Number)
Manage
Customer
Service
11
12
Real-time
Inquiry
Operational
Reporting
ERP
Management Information
Lightly Summarized
More Summarized
More Ad Hoc
DW
Dividing Line
Organization
Location
Business
Process
Data
Application
Technology
Source: Siemens
14
Extract
External
systems
Messaging
Internet
Transform
Data
Warehouse
Marketing
& Sales
Data
Extraction
Transform
and
Load
Processes
Corporate
Translate
Summarize
Product Line
Summation
Location
Finance
Supply
Access
Managed
Query Env.
Purchasing
R/3
Legacy
Systems
Operational
Data Store
Calculate
Attribute
OLAP
Data Subsets
by Segment
Summarized
Data
Synchronize
Reconcile
Vendor
Provided
Batch
Reporting
Data
Mining
Data Marts
15
Where Do I Start?
This table illustrates the reported focus areas from companies in the US and Europe for their
DSS development.
Focus on an area that solves a
problem instead of becoming a
"replacement" project. Gradually,
using a prioritized phased
approach, solve other business
problems.
A good way to think of BW rollout
planning is in terms of business
problems.
BUSINESS PROBLEM
MCM
CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION
69 %
TARGET MARKETING
65 %
FCM
FINANCIAL REPORTING
55 %
PROFITABILITY REPORTING
55%
COST ANALYSIS
46 %
CUSTOMER SERVICE
43 %
CATEGORY MANAGEMENT
30 %
30 %
BUDGETING/PLANNING
27 %
SAP-CRM
SAP-BW
Data
Warehouse
SEM/
SCEM
Financial
Analysis
62 %
25 %
13 %
Supply Chain
Management
Procurement
SAP-HR
22 %
TODAY
Other
16
17
18
Culture, language, attitudes and politics can get in the way of a global project
Make sure you have a blend of local resources in leadership roles and consider
local consultants instead of bringing in US resources
19
Infrastructure
Prerequisites
20
Training
Documentation
1.
2.
21
The relationship
between global control
and success:
Loose Cooperation
(38%)
Independent
(38%)
88%
88%Successful
Successful
30%
30%Successful
Successful
100%
100%Successful
Successful
22
23
JD Edwards
Custom-developed Oracle systems
24
A case study
25
BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
CHANGE
CONTINUE
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
A case study
26
Improved Cost
Efficiency
Minimizes local investments through a
consolidated hardware
environment.
Leverages buying
power in front of
vendors through provision of guidelines
and corporate
agreements.
Enables lower
development costs
through centralized
user documentation
and training.
Establishes a better
working environment
between local units and
central project
Substantially reduces
management through
ABAP report
the positioning as a
programming costs
Competency Center for
through providing
Local Needs.
support for an efficient
SAP BW roll-out.
A case study
Secured Commonality
across Company
Leveraged SAP
Decision Support
Ensures use of
common definitions.
Ensures uniformity
through eliminating
options to develop
regional, functional or
non-standard
solutions.
Provides centralized
testing of vendor
software (combined
with ESOE etc).
Using ONE
methodology - one
way of working.
Ensure reusability.
Reusability will ensure
commonality !
Creates a
Competence Center
for SAP BW.
27
A case study
Global DW
SAP
BW
DW
Local
DW
Local
DW
Oracle
Sybase
MVS
Others
Oracle
Sybase
MVS
Others
Local
DW
Oracle
Sybase
MVS
Others
SAP
BW
SAP
BW
SAP
BW
SAP
BW
SAP
R/ 3
SAP
R/ 3
SAP
R/ 3
1. Test, productify
SAP BW and install
standard
solution(s) locally:
-Software
-Hardware
-Testing
-Training
-Documentation
28
Global DW
SAP
BW
DW
Local
DW
Oracle
Sybase
MVS
Others
Local
DW
Oracle
Sybase
MVS
Others
Local
DW
Oracle
Sybase
MVS
Others
SAP
BW
SAP
BW
SAP
BW
SAP
BW
SAP
R/ 3
SAP
R/ 3
SAP
R/ 3
CHANGE
Bottom-Up
Fixed Departure
Departure I - 3 months
Departure II - 3 months
Departure IV - 3 months
A case study
30
UK
Local
Local
AMC/Dev
AMC/Dev
Spiridon
Spiridon
/CRM
/CRM
BW
Spiridon
others
CRM
CRM
(one client)
Global
Development
Spiridon/CRM
Netherland
s
BW
others
Local
AMC/Dev
Spiridon
/CRM
BW
Spiridon
BW
e.p@ss
Austria
Portugal
others
Switzerland
CRM
Turkey
Belgium
CRM
Spain
Source: Siemens Corp information 2003
31
BW version
Largest
Volume
Lessons
learned
Business
drivers
Success
Very large
global telecom Co.
3.1c
5-20 million
transactional records
in FI cubes
3.1c
Largest cubes have 18.8
million, 18.4 million, and
11.2 million records
each.
Should not have gone
live on 1.2a, should
have used more than
one presentation tool.
The extract and load
process is the most
complex, strong BW
experience is essential
Creation of corporate
enterprise-wide data
warehouse
Note
Fortune-500
Retailer
3.2
120 million records in
sales, and 230GB in
Sales and finance
Data movement is
Custom coding cannot
the most complex
overcome the BW
part of BW. The
extractors. Integration
project would not
with non-R/3 data was
have accepted as
technically easy, but
many enhancements
conceptually hard.
if done again.
The team members must
You need a really .
have solid BW skills
strong BW architect
SAP R/3 was being Custom global reporting
installed, and SAP
has a too-high cost
BW is the reporting of ownership and is too
strategy for all key hard to manage. Want
performance
content and features.
indicators
Is being rolled out to Very happy with the
speed of delivery and
more subsidiaries
and management is
user satisfaction
pleased with results
32
33
Example Summary
A conceptual architecture is the first
step and the physical architecture is a
product of this. It should be driven by
the user needs and the types of
interfaces needed, and not by an internal
IT exercise.
SAP BW can now be used as an
enterprise Data Warehouse and a Global
rollout can be accomplished.
There are two core ways to succeed, but
both require strong central control and
support.
34
35
Create a user acceptance team with a total of 5-7 members from the
various business departments or organizations. Keep the number odd
to assist with votes when decisions are made. With fewer than 5
members it can be hard to get enough members present during some
meetings.
Meet with the team at least once a month during realization to refine
requirements as you are building and have something to show the team.
Issue
36
P r o je c t M a n a g e r
B W A r c h it e c t
P o r t a l d e v e lo p e r ( s )
S a le s T e a m
B
B
P
E
F in a n c e T e a m
u s in e s s a n a ly s t / ( s u b - t e a m le a d )
W d e v e lo p e r
r e s e n t a t io n d e v e lo p e r ( s )
T L d e v e lo p e r
B
B
P
E
u s in e s s a n a ly s t / ( s u b - t e a m le a d )
W d e v e lo p e r
r e s e n t a t io n d e v e lo p e r ( s )
T L d e v e lo p e r
M a t e r ia l M g m t . T e a m
B
B
P
E
u s in e s s a n a ly s t / ( s u b - t e a m le a d )
W d e v e lo p e r
r e s e n t a t io n d e v e lo p e r ( s )
T L d e v e lo p e r
37
38
Issue
Issue
39
40
Germany, Holland
Ambassadors
(PowerUser)
USA
Business Content
Austria
1. Presentation developer
Spain
Italy
Oct. 02
Mar. 03
Jan. 02
Jun. 03
May. 03
41
Note
Increased business
involvement increases
the probability for data
warehouse project
success.
No
(10%)
50%
50%
Successful
Successful
Yes
(90%)
70%
70%
Successful
Successful
42
Project management
Team composition
BW Product
Other lessons
Wrap-up
43
45
46
47
48
49
Resources
50
Good
Your Turn!!!