Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Analysis
Strategic Management
cost
Disposable and
discretionary
Prentice Hall, 2000
income
Technologica Politicall
Legal
Total government
spending for
R&D
Antitrust regulations
Total industry
spending for
R&D
Tax laws
Focus of
technological
efforts
Patent protection
New products
New
developments in
technology
transfer from lab
to marketplace
Chapter 3
Productivity
improvements
Environmental
protection laws
Special incentives
Foreign trade
regulations
Attitudes toward
foreign companies
Laws on hiring and
promotion
Sociocultural
Lifestyle changes
Career
expectations
Consumer
activism
Rate of family
formation
Growth rate of
population
Stability of
government
Age distribution of
population
Level of good
governance
Regional shifts in
population
Cost of doing
business
Life expectancies
Doing business
indicators
Birth
rates
5
Technological
Political-legal
Socio-cultural
Economic
Development
Per capita income
GDP tends
Monetary and
Fiscal policies
Employment level
Currency
convertibility
Nature of
competition
Regulation in
technology transfer
Energy availability
Natural resource
availability
Skill level of
workforce
Patent-trademark
protection
Internet availability
Telecommunication
infrastructure
Form of
government
Political ideology
Tax laws
Stability of
government
Regulation of
foreign
ownership
Trade regulations
Foreign policies
Terrorist activity
Legal system
Customs, norms,
values
Language
Demographics
Life-styles
Religious beliefs
Attitude towards
foreigners
Literacy level
Human rights
Environmentalism
What forces
are driving
change in the
industry?
What are the
key factors for
competitive
success?
How attractive
is the industry
from a profit
perspective?
Features
Market size and
growth rate
Questions to answer
How big is the industry and how fast it is growing?
What does the industrys position in the business
life cycle (early development, rapid growth, early
maturity, maturity, stagnation, decline)?
Scope of
competitive
rivalry
Number of Rivals
&
consumers,
Level
Comments
Economies of scale
Low
Capital required
Low
Access to distribution
channels
High/Ample
There is a
threat
of
entrants as
barriers are
low.
Expected retaliation
Low
Brand Loyalty
Low
Experience Curve
Low/Insignificant
Govt. Action/Approval
Low
great
new
entry
very
Exit Barriers
Factors
Level
Comments
Un-disposable Specialized
Assets
High
High
There is a great
difficulty in exit as
exit barriers are
very high.
High
High
Few
High
Availability of substitutes
Threat of forward integration
Difficult
Low
High
The company
has to play
very carefully
because
of
fewer number
of buyers and
suppliers.
Level
Threat of Obsolescence of
Industrys product
High
Aggressiveness of substitute
products in promotion
High
Low
Perceived price/value
High
Comment
The company has to
play very carefully
because of
availability of
abundant substitute
products.
Unfavorable
Neutral Favorable
Multi-domestic Industries:
Independent subsidiaries in all countries
Differentiated products
Local responsiveness & adaptations
Global Industries:
Standardized products (with uniform company image
with uniform marketing, integrated packaging, &
delivery/supply chain system), but may do minor
adaptation or customization due to specific conditions
Reputation of global brands
Treats the world as a single market (with
homogenous needs)
Presence in almost all continents
Continuum of International
Industries
Multi-domestic
Global
Industry in which
companies tailor their
products to the
specific needs of
consumers in a
particular country.
Retailing
Prentice Hall, 2000
Insurance
Industry in which
companies
manufacture and sell
the same products,
with only minor
adjustments made for
individual countries
Note: More detail will
be
21
around
the
world.
presented in later chapters.
Manufacturing
or Operations
Related KSFs
HR Related
KSFs
Weight
1
Total
Company A
Rating
Company A
Weighted Score
Company B
Rating
Company B
Weighted Score
1.00
Source:T. L. Wheelen and J. D. Hunger, Industry Matrix. Copyright 1997 by Wheelen and Hunger Associates.
Reprinted by permission.
Chapter 3
26
Column 1 (External Factors): List 8-10 most important opportunities and threats
facing the company.
Column 2 (Weights): Assign a weight to each factor. The higher the weight the
more important is this factor to the current and future success of the company.
All weights must sum to 1.0 regardless of the number of factors.
Column 3 (Rating): Assign a rating to each factor from 5.0 (outstanding) to 1.0
(poor) based on managements current response to a particular factor.
Column 4 (weighted score): Multiply the weight in column 2 for each factor in
column 3 to obtain each factors weighted score.
Column 5 (comments): Note that why a particular factor was selected and how
its weight and rating were estimated.
Add the individual weighted score for all external factors in column 4 to
determine the total weighted score for that particular company. The weighted
score of 3 = average, 4 = above average, less than 2.5 as below average.
External
Strategic Factors
Opportunities
Weight
1
Weighted
Score
Rating
2
Comments
4
Threats
1.00
Notes: 1. List opportunities and threats (510 each) in column 1. 2. Weight each factor from 1.0 (Most Important) to 0.0 (Not
Important) in Column 2 based on that factors probable impact on the companys strategic position. The total weights must sum to
1.00. 3. Rate each factor from 5 (Outstanding) to 1 (Poor) in Column 3 based on the companys response to that factor. 4. Multiply
each factors weight times its rating to obtain each factors weighted score in Column 4. 5. Use Column 5 (comments) for rationale
used for each factor. 6. Add the weighted scores to obtain the total weighted score for the company in Column 4. This tells how well
the company is responding to the strategic factors in its external environment.
Source:T. L. Wheelen and J. D. Hunger, External Strategic Factors Analysis Summary (EFAS). Copyright 1991 by Wheelen and
Prentice
Hall,
2000 by permission. Chapter 3
28
Hunger
Associates.
Reprinted