Why are forests political spaces? Control over forests and its effects Colonial control over land and forests Why they remain in practice today
Concept: political forests
Why are forests political? Political ; because forests are the site of power and Control, For states to gain wealth For communities to earn livelihood For as long as there power and control over something, Or someone, or some; the process of controlling
Peluso and Vandergeest
2001
P & V talks about Southeast Asian forests
How access or the rights to access and use
forests were transferred From local control to Centralised control via colonisation What process of colonisation made the transfer of control over forests possible? (or what are the enabling processes that made centralised control possible during colonial times?)
Enabling Process 1. Generally transfer was made Through legislation (acts, enactments ordinances)
E.g. Sabah Land Ordinance 1930,
Sabah Forest Enactment 1968, (amended) 1984 Sabah Sabah Park Enactment 1984 Sarawak Land Code 1958 Kedah
---- CREATION OF STATE FORESTS strong objection
from the local communities and continue to this day. Sabah land Ordinance 1930 and Sarawak Land Code 1958 - all land belong to the state, unless they have title . - only land with titles belong to the people
ENABLING PROCESS 2: Science of
forestry Expert knowledge . 1) Using science to justify exclusion or inclusion Science to justify the creation of forest reserves (exclusively for timber teak, ramin, meranti ); - OF VALUE TO STATES AND INDUSTRY, especially timber industry. AFTER WWII 2) Forestry science does not include the livelihood of communities as important - e.g. exports of aromatic wood (e.g gaharu, resin and damar; gutta percha, feather , skin crocodie, deer) - OF VALUE TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES 3) Colonial governments invest heavily in forestry departments, forestry science became institutionalised
Enabling Process 3: GEO POLITICAL POWER
and control E.G. FOR KING OF SIAM CONTROL OVER FOREST means claim over territories and expanding jurisdiction eastwards (indochina French power, westward Burma) history of relations between historical Siam and Kedah and Kelantan is about control over forests and territories. (Satun people of southern Thailand speak Kedah Malay, People in Sungei golok, pattani and naratiwat province in Southern Thailan speak a version of Kelantan Malay)
however, there is Legal pluralism
BUT the legislations and forestry administration cannot ignore altogether customary practices (adat) So legislations tend to include SOME aspects of customary practices E.g. section 5 (2) of the Sarawak Land Code - different ways of claiming customary rights to land. E.g. agriculture, grave sites, padang ragut Sabah Land Ordinance 1930 also provided for different ways of claiming customary rights to land, Sections 14, 15 and others. E,g, Kedah British advisers gave the Sultan of Kedah the power to collect land rents. -- historically, power was not centralised in the hands of one Sultan.
Legal pluralism = partial recognition of
customary practices Why partial Because the objectives of the legislations (Acts, ordinance, enactment) in Sabah and Sarawak and Semenanjung are to make way or to create space for commercial plantations. FOR PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND COLONIAL POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS, READ SHAMSUL A.B. FROM BUMIPUTRA TO COLONIAL RULE Vandergeest and Peluso: large scale rubber plantations in Malaya (successful colonisation) Large scale forest plantations for teak as in Thailand In Sabah tobacco (e.g. Darvel Bay), in Sarawak not so successful because the Brooke regime was not efficiently colonial.
Present day effects: colonial acts continued
until today Why are dams possible in many developing countries despite the land being occupied by indigenous peoples? Answer : Using the concept of political forest, Look at who controls forests now, and whose needs are considered primary? And whose needs are regarded as secondary? Case studies: Hydro power as renewable energy: as an effect of political forest the Sardar Sarovar dam India, the Sungei Selangor dam, Malaysia because of Extension from colonial Acts. Colonial legislations - promote centralised control -change of landuse from use by local communities to use for energy generation. Sardar Sarovar dam hill tribe people (adivasi) Selangor dam land occupied by Orang Asli BOTH DAMS INVOLVE PEOPLE BEING DISPLACED. ARGUMENTS FOR BUILDING DAMS ARE USUALLY ABOUT DEVELOPMENT; OR ABOUT THE COMMON GOOD
Why colonial laws remain in practice
today BECAUSE 1) Not much forests left 2) NOTE: DECISIONS ABOUT LANDUSE (plantation agriculture, logging, mining) is a State government issue, not Federal. LAND/FORESTS ARE A SOURCE OF STATE REVENUE AND POWER (THROUGH PATRONAGE) POLITICAL FORESTS ESTABLISHED DURING COLONIAL ERA CONTINUED UNTIL TODAY SO THAT In Sarawak native access to land under sections of the Sarawak Land Code 1958, allows Native Customary Lands to be established, but limited activities. In Sabah, Native Title and Communal Title , according to some sections of the Land Ordinance 1930, but only under certain conditions. FOR BOTH SABAH AND SARAWAK Lands under NCR or NT/CT suffer from Insecurity of tenure because State government has power to makes decision about land use.
All readings will be put on facebook
I) Peluso anad Vandergeest, on political forest 2) Pratyusha Basu The Narmada Valluey(Sardar Sarovar Dam) 3) Swainson and McGregor on the Sungei Selangor Dam REMINDER FOR LECTURE 3: DR. Afrizals lecture , the readings on technocentricism and ecocntricism are in the usual textbooks, - De Stigueir, Roberts, Jane. Additional reading on recycling Dr. Afrizal has already put on face book. THE END.