Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DEBATING
Cultivates quick and multi-dimensional,
logical thinking.
Enhances the ability to develop
reasoned opinions.
Gives a better understanding of the
current events and the world around
us.
Improves self-confidence, speaking
style and command of language.
Enriches your overall leadership
qualities.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
GOOD DEBATERS
POSSESS
Good knowledge of current issues.
Ability to generate ideas.
Ability to think critically and logically.
Ability to present the ideas
systematically.
Ability to handle culturally diverse
and challenging situations with great
ease and to ones their (own)
enjoyment.
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
DIFFERENT FORMATS OF
DEBATES
Parliamentary & Non-parliamentary
Malaysian Conventional
3 members to a team
Topics given in advance
POIs not allowed
American Parliamentary
2 members to a team
POIs are allowed
DIFFERENT FORMATS OF
DEBATES
Royal Malaysian/ Asian
3 members to a team
POIS are allowed.
Parliamentary
Format of
Debate
Audience
A DEBATE IS JUDGED
ON THE BASIS OF:
1. Matter:
What you present (i.e. the
content)
2. Manner:
How you present (i.e. the style)
3. Method:
Organisation/ structure of your
presentation
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
ELEMENTS OF
MATTER
1. Definitions:
4. Rebuttals:
- Set up of the debate
- Must be logical
- Must be relevant
2. Arguments:
- Must be prompt
- Must be logical
- Must be relevant
3. Evidences:
- Must be relevant
- Evidential value (strength)
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
DEFINING A
TOPIC
RULES OF
DEFINITION
Characteristics
of a Proper
Definition:
It must bear a close relation to the motion.
It must not be truistic.
It must not employ time or place setting.
It must not be based on overly specific knowledge
Kinds of
Definitions:
Literal with key-words definition.
Metaphorical definition.
Issue based &/or specified definition (different
from time-place setting).
CHALLENGE OF
DEFINITION
Grounds for
Challenge:
You can only challenge a definition if it violates any of the criteria
stated earlier. Frequently used terms in challenging definitions
are: wholly unreasonable, squirrel, time-place set, truistic.
You cannot challenge a definition simply because you have a
more reasonable or better definition.
CHALLENGE OF
DEFINITION
Challenge must
come from the leader of the opposition, not
later.
Leader of the opposition must provide an alternative
definition.
In most of the cases, the teams must introduce an 'even if
argument.
An `Even if' argument is not possible in some cases. (e.g.
truistic definition & definition running counter to the
resolution i.e. where govt. has taken the oppositions case).
In a definition debate, all the speakers except the PM argue
the following:
Why challenge?
Validity/ invalidity of the two definitions.
Even if we are to accept the other side's definition, these are the
weaknesses of their case.
Positive case under their own definition.
ESTABLISHING AN
ARGUMENT
Basic statement
Logical explanations of why and how
the basic statement stands
Proofs/ evidences/ examples that factually
establish your basic statement
Conclusion/ how it proves
your teams theme
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
EFFECTIVE
REBUTTALS
R e b u t t a ls
A tta c k s
(R e b u t th e A rg u m e n ts )
D e fe n c e
( R e b u t t h e R e b u t t a ls )
ELEMENTS OF
MANNER/STYLE
Respectable attitude towards the judges and
the other team.
hand
gestures,
pacing,
Impression of sincerity.
Humour,
sarcasm.
wit,
appropriate
and
healthy
ELEMENTS OF METHOD
- Team structure
-
- Individual Structure
-
MODEL INDIVIDUAL
SPEECH
Definitions/ theme of the
team
Rebuttals (attacks and defence)
OPENING OPP.
- Defines
- Responds to the
governments case
CLOSING GOV.
CLOSING OPP.
- Responds to governments
case
- Responds
to the Opp.sCommunication
case
Speech & Interpersonal
Enhancement Unit, IIUM
GOVERNMENT:
GOVERNMENT:
Defines the topic.
Gives the case structure and theme.
Presents own arguments.
Provides a summary of his speech. (What I've given u so far..).
2nd Speaker
Rebuts.
Reiterates and defends his first speakers arguments.
Presents own argument.
Provides a summary of his speech.
3rd Speaker
Rebuts substantially.
Reiterates and defends his own team's case.
Provides a summary of his speech.
Reply Speaker
Presents a comparative overview of the clash points in the debate
proving why his teams case stands
POINTS OF INFORMATION
(POIs)
A POI can be in a question or statement form and should
not take more than 15 seconds.
Each speaker should accept at least two POIs.
All three members of the team should try to give POIs,
but they must not be disruptive.
POIs are judged on the basis of:
-