Sie sind auf Seite 1von 14

Results & Discussion

Reference Mode
Depressed (disabled and healthy)
200,000

People

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040
Time (Year)
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : base case sensitivity analysis

Depressed (disabled and


healthy stock) exhibits a
linear upward trend from
2016 to 2040

Reference Mode
base case sensitivity analysis

Used Monte Carlo Sensitivity


Analysis at 50%
To see the range of values of
depressed (disabled and
healthy) elderly for each
year from 2016 to 2040

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Student Volunteer Program


Student Volunteer Program SA

Used Monte Carlo Sensitivity


Analysis at 50%
To see the range of values of
depressed (disabled and
healthy) elderly for each
year from 2016 to 2040

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Student Volunteer Program


base case sensitivity analysis
Student Volunteer Program SA

Sensitivity Analysis of the


Student Volunteer Program
compared with the
Reference Mode

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Student Volunteer Program


Depressed (disabled and healthy)
200,000

People

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040
Time (Year)
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : base case sensitivity analysis
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : Student Volunteer Program

With a student volunteer program to get


students to interact with the elderly,
implemented in 2016 using a ramp function
Number of depressed (disabled and healthy)
elderly for each year from 2016 to 2040
decreases.
In 2040, the number of depressed (disabled
and healthy) elderly has a mean = 112976.7
ci= 112152.2, 113801.2]
Compared with the reference mode of
mean= 130369.7 ci= [129521.9, 131217.4]
The trend remains the same as in the
reference mode

Subsidies To Families That Live With


Elderly
Subsidies to elderly living with family SA

Used Monte Carlo Sensitivity


Analysis at 50%
To see the range of values of
depressed (disabled and
healthy) elderly for each
year from 2016 to 2040

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Subsidies To Families That Live With


Elderly
base case sensitivity analysis
Subsidies to elderly living with family SA

Sensitivity Analysis of
Subsidy Policy compared
with the Reference Mode

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Subsidies To Families That Live With


Elderly
With subsidies for families that have elderly
Depressed (disabled and healthy)

200,000

People

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040
Time (Year)
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : base case sensitivity analysis
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : Subsidies to elderly living with family SA

staying with them, implemented in 2016 using


a step function
Number of depressed (disabled and healthy)
elderly for each year from 2016 to 2040
decreases.
In 2040, the number of depressed (disabled
and healthy) elderly has a Mean =
115481.13 CI = [114648.76, 116313.50]
Compared with the reference mode of
Mean= 130369.7 CI= [129521.9, 131217.4]

Subsidies To Families That Live With


Elderly
From 2016 to 2020, the number of
Depressed (disabled and healthy)

200,000

People

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040
Time (Year)
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : base case sensitivity analysis
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : Subsidies to elderly living with family SA

depressed (disabled and healthy) elderly


decreases exponentially
Subsidy causes a large number of elderly to
stay with their families from 2016 to 2020,
causing a large decrease in the number of of
depressed (disabled and healthy) elderly
The number of depressed (disabled and
healthy) elderly exhibits a linear upward
trend similar to the reference mode from
2021 to 2040

Marketing Campaign To Convince Depressed (Disabled


And Healthy) Elderly To Seek Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy Policy SA

Used Monte Carlo Sensitivity


Analysis at 50%
To see the range of values of
depressed (disabled and
healthy) elderly for each
year from 2016 to 2040

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Marketing Campaign To Convince Depressed (Disabled


And Healthy) Elderly To Seek Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy Policy SA
base case sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity Analysis of the


Marketing Campaign
compared with the
Reference Mode

"Depressed (disabled and healthy)"


200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000

2010

2020
Time (Year)

2030

2040

Marketing Campaign To Convince Depressed (Disabled


And Healthy) Elderly To Seek Psychotherapy
Depressed (disabled and healthy)
200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0
2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040
Time (Year)
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : Psychotherapy Policy SA
"Depressed (disabled and healthy)" : base case sensitivity analysis

With marketing campaigns to convince


depressed (disabled and healthy) elderly to
seek psychotherapy treatment, implemented
in 2016 using a step function
Number of depressed (disabled and healthy)
elderly for each year from 2016 to 2040
decreases.
In 2040, the number of depressed (disabled
and healthy) elderly has a Mean = 101821
CI = [100811 102831]
Compared with the reference mode of
Mean= 130369.7 CI= [129521.9, 131217.4]
The trend remains the same as in the
reference mode

The Best Policy


From the results, we can see that in order to have the
least number of depressed (disabled and healthy)
elderly in 2040
Implementing marketing campaigns to convince
depressed (disabled and healthy) elderly to seek
psychotherapy treatment is the most effective policy

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen