Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Compensation
Practices
competition
A shift from manufacturing to a service
economy
Response to these changes by many firms that
includes downsizing and restructuring
3
Competition
Increased competition has forced organizations
to look more carefully at three dimensions :
1.
2.
3.
Service Economy
Tangible Products
Selling stand-alone products
Focus on product characteristic
Service is a cost and chore
Intangiables Services
Selling individual performance
Focus on customer needs
Service is a startegy
Margin of
discretionary
performance
(percents)
Peak
Acceptable
Manufacturing
Service
Compensation :
An Implementation Strategy
Strategic Challenges :
1.
2.
3.
4.
Element of Compensation
Element
Employee
Interest
Organization
Interest
Base Pay
Provide standard of
living
Employee Benefits
Protect standard of
living
10
Alternative Compensation
Strategies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Performance-based pay
Merit awards or incentives not tied to base pay
Lump-sum bonuses
Gain sharing plans
Skill/Competency based pay
Profit-sharing plans
Cafeteria plans
11
Performance-based pay
Adjustments to pay are based on individual or group performance and are not
granted simply because of organizational
membership or time with the employer.
12
13
14
Lump-sum bonuses
Merit or incentive awards are granted on a onetime lump sum basis are not distributed in the
form of weekly or monthly pay checks.
15
16
Profit-sharing plans
These plans establish profit goals for the
organization and set aside share of all
profits exceeding the goal into a pool that
is distributed back in the from of bonuses
to employees.
17
Cafeteria plans
These are compensation plans that allow
employees individual flexibility in their
choices among benefit plan elements.
Some cafeteria plans are total
compensation plans, in that the employee
can pool dollars going into both direct pay
and benefits.
18
Fit
Compensation
Design
Performance
20
Four question
1. To what extent are organizations using
alternative compensation design?
2. Are there any risks associated with such
designs?
3. Is there any evidence that companies currently
adapt compensation designs to their strategies?
4. Is there any evidence that companies that do so
perform better than those that do not?
21
Low
High
high
At risk
Base Pay
Entitlement
Low
22
Administrative Elements
4. Participation in Design
5. Participation in
Administration
6. Centralization/
decentralization
7. Communication
8. Formalization/standardization
Issue
24
Prospector
Analyzer
Product market
Definition
Narrow, stable
market;
market concerned
with protecting
market share
Changing product
market emphasis;
search for new
market; focus on
innovation
Characterized by
mixed strategy
Technology
Single core
technology;
investment in
improvements
Multiple Prototype
tehnologies; invest
more in people than
in machines
Single core
technology;
and investment in
people
Management
Dominated by
production,
finance types
Tends to change
often; dominated
by marketing &
R&D types
Dominated by
marketing &
research relatively
stable
Design/
Administration
Functional
Dividion of labor;
highly formal.
Product centered
division of labor
few formal rules
market relatively
open.
Divisionalized or
matrix structure
combined of
structured and
centralized formal
work
Performance Criteria
Promotion based
on past performance
cost and budget
Performance
measured against
market outcomes
viz competitors
Performance
measured on
combination
of cost market
outcomes.
25
Compensation Design
Pay/Strategy Fit : Compensation Design
Issue
Market versus internal equity
Award Basis
At-risk earnings
Defender
Prospector
Internal
External
Entitlement Performance
Productivity Business Plan
performance
26
Compensation Design
Pay/Strategy Fit : Compensation Administration
Issue
Communication
Participation/Involvement
Standardization-pay adjsutments
Standardization-administration
Centralization
Defender
Prospector
Low
Low
Low
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
27
From
to
Base pay
Incentive/Trigger
Incentive/earnings
Pay determination
Large %
Budgets
Small %
Emphasis on the job
Small %
Business Plan performance
Large %
Emphasis on the individual
28
From
to
Secret
Top Down
Traditional
Standard
Open
Broad involvement
Strategy Driven
Choice
29