Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DELIVERY SYSTEM
Submitted by: Pratiksha Srivastava
M.Pharm
(1st year)
Galgotias university
INTRODUCTION:
COMPOSITION OF EYE
Water
- 98%
Solid -1.8%
Organic element Protein - 0.67%
Sugar - 0.65%
NaCl - 0.66%
Other mineral element sodium, potassium and
ammonia - 0.79%.
Ocular Absorption
(5% of the dose)
Corneal
Route:
-Primary Route.
-Small Lipophilic
Drugs.
Conjunctival
and Sclera
Route:
-Secondary Route.
-Large Hydrophilic
Drugs.
Aqueous
Humor
Ocular Tissue
Systemic Absorption
(50-100% of the dose)
Major Routes:
-Conjuctiva of eye
-Nose
Minor Routes:
-Lacrimal Drainage
-Pharynx
-Aqueous Humor
-Inner Ocular Tissues
Elimination
5
IDEAL CHARACTERISTIC
Sterility
Isotonicity:
Buffer/pH
Less
adjustment
drainage tendency
Minimum
protein binding
CLASSIFICATION
OCDDS
SOLUTION
OF
SUSPENTION
EMULSION
OINTMENT
INSERT
GELS
LIPOSOMES
NIOSOMES
DISCOMES
CONVENTIONA
L
IMPLANTS
IONTOPHORESIS
DENDRIMER
MICROEMULSION
VESICULAR
OCULAR DELIVERY
SYSTEMS
CONTROL
RELEASE
PARTICULATE
NANOSUSPENSION
MICRONEEDLE
MICROPARTICLES
MUCOADHESIVE
POLYMERS
NANOPARTICLES
CONVENTIONAL
EYE DROPS:
Drugs
administered in the
Suspension.
Various
The
Advantages
Disadvantages
Solutions
1. Convenience
2. Usually do not
interfere with vision
of patient.
1. Rapid precorneal
elimination.
2. Non sustained action.
3. To be Administered at
frequent intervals.
Suspension
1. Patient compliance.
2. Best for drug with
slow dissolution.
3. Longer contact time
Emulsion
1. Prolonged release of
drug from vehicle
1. Blurred vision.
2. patient non
compliance.
OINTMENT:
10
Advantages:
1.
2.
3.
.Disadvantages:
1.
2.
3.
4.
VESICULAR:
LIPOSOMES: Liposomes
Drugs
ADVANTAGES
delivered intact to
both
hydrophilic
and organs.
hydrophobic drug.
Possibility
DISADVANTAGES
Requires special
packaging and storing
ADVANTAGES:
16
polymer.
3. A retaining ring - of EVA impregnated with titanium
dioxide.
ADVANTAGES
Improved compliance.
DISADVANTAGES
Expensive.
CONTACT LENS:
ERODIBLE INSERTS:
LACRISERTS
Sterile
SODI
Soluble
Lacriserts
Minidisc
Diameter 4 to 5 mm.
Composition
Pilocarpine, chloramphenicol.
Non-erodible
inserts
Advantages
Disadvantages
Effective.
Flexiblility in drug
Patient
type & dissolution
discomfort.
rate.
Requires patient
Need only be
insertion.
introduced into
eye & not
removed.
Controlled rate of
release.
Prolonged
Patient
delivery.
discomfort.
Flexibility for type Irritation to eye.
of drug selected. Tissue fibrosis.
Sustained
release.
1. Implants
1.
2.
EVALUATION OF OCDDS
. Thickness of film
2. Content uniformity
3. Uniformity of Weight
4. Percentage moisture absorption
5. Percentage moisture loss
6. In-vitro drug release
7. In-vivo drug release
8. Accelerated stability studies