Sie sind auf Seite 1von 83

CHAPTER 3

METHODS OF
RESEARCH
Prepared and reported by:
Espinosa, Kenneth Pearl T.
Laig, Maricris DM
Mamaid, Ana Rose SJ.
Manalo, Delfin Jr. M.
Marquez, Lorna A.
Miles, Michelle B.

TOPICS

METHODS OF RESEARCH
RESPONDENTS OF THE STUDY
SOURCES OF DATA AND INSTRUMENTS
USED
PROCEDURES
STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES

QUALITATIVE METHOD
Usually
researches with data
from non-probability samples
Researches
that do not seek
generalization of data
Researches not concerned with
inferring the characteristics of
the population

QUANTITATIVE METHOD
Researches are not datafree,
using all types of sampling
techniques
Researches
that
aim
for
generalization
Usually used probability samples
Infer the characteristics of the
population

QUANTITATIVE METHOD

Concerned with:
Descriptive Methods
Experimental Methods

A. QUALITATIVE METHOD

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Used for special kinds of researches or


studies such as the following:

1.
2.
3.
4.

Ethnographic
Phenomenological
Appreciative inquiry (AI)
Historical Researches

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

1. ETHNOGRAPHIC

Concerned with the environment or setting where the


behavior occurred

The general frame of reference that directly influences


current decision-making about specific issues. (Carp,
1989)

Having the purpose of:


a. discovering & describing the culture of people or
an organization
b. understanding the social phenomenon from the
perspective of the participants
c. analyzing the context
narrating their stories

of

participants

and

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

2. PHENOMENOLOGICAL

Founded in 1940 by Marvin Farber


Deals with human experience, using
metaphor, narrative form and inductive
method.
Elrich (1996) says that phenomenological
research seeks to explain rather than just
merely describe the incidents in the story.
Categorized as a research method and as
a process, is more viewed as an approach
to explain human and social experience.

PHENOMENOLOGICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Philosophical
Foundation

the
approach is based on the following
concepts of:
Edmund

Hussels on certain absolute


knowledge
Investigating general essence
Apprehending essential relationship among
essences
Watching the modes of approving
Watching the constituents of a phenomenon
Interpreting the meaning of phenomenon

PHENOMENOLOGICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

In short, the phenomenological


approaches have the following
characteristics:
a. hypothesis-free
b. free from preconceptions
c. developmental change of a
system
d. a strategy of organizational
change
e. describing highest quality of a

PHENOMENOLOGICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES
It
is
not
intensive

DISADVANTAGES

labor No generalization can


be made

Hypothesis-free
Not
very
much
concerned
with
numeric concepts

No inferences due to
its nature

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

3. APPRECIATIVE
INQUIRY

A method that would change negative


perspectives into something good. It
circumvents the negative aspect into a
positive one.
Comes from two words: Appreciative
and Inquiry.

Inquiry

is an act of exploration and


discovery, to ask questions.
Appreciate means valuing or the act of
recognizing the best in the other people or
the world around.

APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Among its features are:


a. it considers the strength and

potentials
of
persons
and
opportunities, not weaknesses or
threats
b. it turns negative into positive
c. although it is qualitative in
nature, it can be used as a
composite
method
with
quantitative ones

APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
It
is
not
labor No generalization can
intensive
be made
Hypothesis-free
It does not involve
quantitative data
It can be used with
other quantitative
methods

No inferences due to
its nature

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

4. HISTORICAL

Systematic collection and evaluation of


data
to
describe,
explain
and
understand actions or event that
occurred sometime in the past.

Deals with past events and interprets


in the light of the present.

HISTORICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

PURPOSES OF HISTORICAL
METHOD

To make people aware of what has


happened in the past in order to:

Learn from past failures and successes


Apply to present-day problems
Make predictions
Test hypotheses concerning relationships or
trends
Understand present practices and policies

HISTORICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Steps in Historical Method

Formulating the problem


Gathering of Material Resources
Classifying and analyzing Historical
Resources
Report writing

HISTORICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Categories of Sources

Documents
Numerical records
Oral Statements
Relics

HISTORICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Primary vs. Secondary sources


External and Internal Criticism

HISTORICAL - QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES
The research
complete.

paper

DISADVANTAGES
is

not It develops less creativity since


only data that exist are
important

Documents are strong evidence Researcher cannot alter the


than testimonial ones.
form of evidences, since the
form itself will denote validity
Data are not complete, which
makes
historical
studies
hanging and may give rise to
other problems.
There is no room to establish
inferences,
generalities,
or
projections,
so
historical
research have little utilitarian
value.

B. QUANTITATIVE
METHOD

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Generally empirical which means a research


based on testing or experience
Derived from direct data which are necessary
numeric
Explaining phenomena by collecting numerical
data using mathematically based method and
statistical method.
Kinds of Quantitative Research:
1. Descriptive Method
2. Experimental Method

1. DESCRIPTIVE METHOD

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

1. CASE STUDIES

A study involving descriptive information


about one person.
A detailed and in-depth research involving
few respondents (from one to a small size of
less than 10 respondents)
can be beneficial because they can provide
detailed information and insight into the
feelings, thoughts, and behaviors of a
person who may be unique in some ways.

CASE STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Uses of Case Studies

Provides further the investigation with hypothesis, that


might be difficult to study in other contexts, in being a
micro study with limited small sample.

Gives out unique situations, to give out new information.

Provides new insights, helps modify pre-existing beliefs, &


points out gaps in knowledge, but on a micro size scale.

Demonstrates the effectiveness of a certain theoretical


model. It is a detailed information and in-depth research
involving few respondents.

CASE STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Limitations of Case Studies

Cant generalize the results to the


wider population.
Researchers' own subjective feeling
may
influence
the
case
study
(researcher bias).
Difficult to replicate.
Time consuming.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

2. SURVEYS

an activity in which many people are asked a


question or a series of questions in order to
gather information about what most people do
or think about something.
Survey studies are categorized into two,
namely:
DESCRIPTIVE SURVEY uses questionnaire or

other instruments prepared by the researcher to


generate data.
DESCRITIVE NORMATIVE SURVEY deals with
sources of data that are standardized, like mental
ability test, performance questionnaires , and
others.

SURVEYS - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Used to gather relatively limited data from


relatively large numbers of cases.
It may include:
correlational (the relationship between things that

happen or change together)


assessment (an idea or opinion about something) or;
Causal comparative studies (relatively or showing the
cause of something).

Example :
1. Interaction of age and gender on Science Subject
Performance of Grade IV Students.
2. Stress & coping strategies of Nurses in ICU
hospitals. Etc.

SURVEYS - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

It is a writing research report There is a possibility that


not a labor intensive in deriving assertions made by respondents
data.
to questionnaires may not be
true or correct.
The
methodology
is
not There is a possibility that the
complex, reduces cost, effort instruments prepared by the
and time.
researcher may be inadequate
or insufficient which means
there is the problem of validity
of instruments, especially if it is
researcher made.
It
can
avail
of
current
questionnaires
and
standardized instruments for
the study.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

3. DEVELOPMENTAL
STUDIES

A reliable information about a group of


people over a long period of time.

Two methods of Developmental


Studies:
Longitudinal Method
Cross-Sectional Method

DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Two Methods of Developmental Studies


1. THE LONGITUDINAL METHOD
Study the same sample of participants over an
extended period of time.
Ex. a) Study on autistic children from 1 or 5 years
b) Study on fraternal twins from birth to 7 years old
2. THE CROSS-SECTIONAL METHOD
This concerns studying participants of various age
levels and of other characteristics at the same point in
time.
Ex. a) A study on the development of babies from birth to
five yrs afflicted with a certain type of diseases, and
using participants from all age levels at the same time.

DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES
It is not labor intensive.

DISADVANTAGES
It is not possible to develop
inferences from the findings,
since the sample is very small.

A small-sized sample can be It is also not possible to give


used.
generalizations of the findings
for the same reason that size is
small but can be made only for
the particular sample.

It gives detailed and accurate


information of the objects or
persons to be observed.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

4. ASSESSMENT OR EVALUATION
STUDIES

Assessment or evaluation studies are those which refer to


be the efficiency and effectiveness of policies, instruments,
or the variables that may be considered.
The survey deals with impression of perceptions of
respondents, it is often times subjective (based on feelings
or opinions rather than facts)
Assessment the act of making judgement about
something.
- an idea or opinion about something.
Evaluation to judge the value or condition (someone or
something) in a careful & thoughtful way
EX. The use of scanners in determining sex of babies etc.

ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE


RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

The findings have direct use There might be difficulty in


since these studies fall into getting data. They do not like to
category of applied research.
give information.
The findings serve as basis for Recommendations may not be
decision-making
and
the accepted.
formulation of policies in the
management concerned.
Data do exist.
The study is not labor intensive.

The equipment or instrument


may not be available.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

5. COMPARATIVE
STUDIES
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
The method is not labor intensive. The findings are limited.
The result is easily seen.

The variables are selected, not only The selection of the variables is
as basis of previous studies, but usually limited.
also on what subject have.

The
variables
are
selected When respondents are group into
according to which can give categories,
it
is
necessarily
significant implications to the study. comparative studies, but the sizes
of the categories may not be
conformable for comparison.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

CORRELATIONAL
STUDIES
COMMON TERMS:
RELATIONSHIP- The way in which two
or more people or things are
connected.
ASSOCIATION- the process of forming
mental connection or bonds between
sensations, ideas, or memories.
CORRESPONDENCE- direct relationship
to or with something or between two
things.

CORRELATIONAL STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Type of research method that shows


relationship from one variable to
another variable. This can be direct from
left to right or vice versa or two way.
Examples:
The relationship between Management
Styles and Leadership Dimensions of
Managers of a certain business firm.
Total Quality Management and Teacher
Empowerment of a certain National High
School.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

FOLLOW UP STUDIES
Follow up the development
Referred to the tracer studies
Examples:
A Follow-up studies of the Graduate of a
Maritime School From 1990 to 2005
A Follow- up Studies of the Nursing
Graduates of a Certain University from 1990
to 2005
A Tracer Study of the Graduates of the Drug
Rehabilitation Center from 1992 to 2005.

FOLLOW UP STUDIES OR TRACER STUDIES- QUANTITATIVE


RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES
The finding will benefit the institution.
They reveal the status or the condition of the alumni of the
school for a certain period of time, which a school should
have.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

TRENDS AND PROJECTION STUDIES


A type of research method deals with
forward looking.
It can also predict behavior of some
economic variables.
Examples:
Enrolment Trends in the College of
Education from 1995 to 2005, and Ten Years
Hence.
World Nursing Demands Within Five Years
Hence

TREND STUDIES - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

Easy to generate data since most The probability for the presence of
are documentaries
adverse factors is great.

Has a basic assumption: factors


remain constant for projection

There are complexities in feasibility


studies.

Important in decision-making and


policy formulation

Imperative for planning

In some cases, data maybe difficult


to obtain.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

EX-POST FACTO
RESEARCH

A research method that deals with the


past
Ex Post Facto means after the fact

Example:
The effects of HAVING and NOT HAVING
Textbooks on College Algebra

EX-POST FACTO - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

It gives information on difference in Data may not be available


the past results.

It is not a labor intensive

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

PARTICIPATORY
RESEARCH

Concerns large populations


There must be sufficient time allowed for the
research process to deal with the complexity
of the problem.
It calls for a method which allows for reflection
done jointly by the researchers and members
of a culture where the research is done.
It requires that the research process must be
permanent sequence of statement, action
reflection, and analysis.

PARTICIPATORY RESARCH- QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Example:
The implementation of the
Comprehensive Land Reform Program
in a certain Province in Central Luzon.

DESCRIPTIVE METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

DOCUMENTARY
ANALYSIS
Analyzing written records and documents
to solve a problem.
Examples:
Enrolment Data as Influenced by Economic
Variables
Analyzing English Grade of different Groups
of students(Grades taken from registrars
office are also documentary data)

DOCUMENTARY ANALYSIS - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

Generally, it is not an in- depth


If they are grades, then data are study
easily obtained.
Similarly, if data come from hospital Most of the time, it is only
, government offices, or any
descriptive.
secondary documentary data
It is not labor intensive.

2. EXPERIMENTAL
METHOD

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Definition

It is a collection of research designs


which use manipulation and controlled
testing to understand causal process.
Generally, one or more variables are
manipulated to determine their effect
on a dependent variable.

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Characteristics

It has two important and necessary actors the controlled and


the experimental variables

The experimental, or the independent variable is manipulated


and applied to a dependent variable, while the latter is held
constant.

The effect of the independent variable on the dependent


variable is measured and is usually the creation measure for an
experimental design.

Experimental designs are usually numeric and caters to


sophisticated statistical design

Usually, experimental designs are limited to small samples.

Experimental designs are labor intensive since it is done in the


laboratory.

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

TWO GROUPS OF EXPERIMENTAL


DESIGNS

1.
2.

EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
CONTROL GROUP

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

1.
2.
3.

MANIPULATION
CONTROL
RANDOMIZATION

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

DIFFERENT MATCHING METHODS

Person-to-person matching
Matching Groups
Ranking Method
Homogenous Group
Using subjects as their own controls

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE (ANCOVA)

One of the uses of Analysis of


Covariance
is
when
using
two
experiment groups and there is no
particular method to put them in initial
form.

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS


A. PRE-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
Design No. 1: ONE-SHOT CASE STUDY
Design No. 2: THE SINGLE GROUP PRE AND POSTTEST DESIGN
Design No. 3: THE STATIC GROUP COMPARISON
Design No. 4: THE PARALLEL-EQUATED TWO GROUP
DESIGN

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

B. TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN


Design no. 5 The Pre-Post test Control
Group
Design no. 6 The Solomon Four Group Design
Design no. 7 The Post-test only Control Group
Design
C. QUASI EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Design no. 8 The Time-Series Experiment
Design no. 9 Counterbalance Design

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Factorial Design
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance)
Internal And External Validity
Threats of Internal and External Validity

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

The Pre-experimental
Design
Design No. 1 (One Shot Case
Study)
- Considers only one group exposed to
the experimental variable.
a. X
b. O

Where X = Treatment
O = Post-Test

PRE- EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design No. 2 (Single Group Pre and Post Test Design


sometimes, this is viewed as a quasi-experimental single
group design with Pre and Post Test where variables are
more visible.
O (1) Pre-test
X
Experimental Variable
O (2) Post-test
Advantages:
>One does not have to worry about controlled variables.
>The method is not difficult and data are accessible.
Disadvantages:
>It is not a very sophisticated method of research.
It is difficult to prepare the pre and post test for they have to
undergo validation.

PRE- EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design No. 3 (Static Group


Comparison)
this is a design in which a group which
has experience X for the purpose of
establishing the effects of X.
Design No. 4 (Parallel-Equated Two
Group Design)
- this method is similar to Design No. 3 but
they differ in purpose. They involve two
groups: the experimental and control group,
which are not usually random samples.

The True Experimental


Design

EXPERIMENTAL METHOD: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

The true experimental designs control


nearly all sources of internal and
external validity.

What is internal and External validity?


Internal Validity
Is a crucial measure in quantitative studies,
where it ensures that a researcher's
experiment design closely follows the
principle of cause and effect.
(https. explorable.com.independentvariable)

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

External Validity
External validityis about generalization: To
what extent can an effect in research, be
generalizedto populations, settings,
treatment variables, and measurement
variables (https. explorable.com.independentvariable)
Design no. 5. The Pre-Post Test Control Group
The design involves two groups, both of which
are formed by random assignment. Both groups
are pre-tested and post tested but only one
group is given the experimental treatment.

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 5. The Pre-Post Test


Control Group
R O (1) X (2)
R O (3) - (4)
Where
R
O(1) -random assignment
O(2) -experimental pre-test
O(3) -control pre-test
O(4) -experimental post test
X
-treatment

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 6. The Solomon Four-Group Design

This design has the highest prestige


since it has the greatest validity.
Extension of Pre and Post test
Two groups are pre and post tested;
two groups are post tested; two groups
have treatments
Two
groups
have
experimental
treatments

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 6. The Solomon Four-Group Design

The design can be illustrated as follows

R
R
R
R
1.
2.
3.
4.

O
O
O
O

(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)

X
X
X
X

O
O
O
O

(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)

O (1) and O (2)


O (1) and O (2)
O (1) and O (2)
O (1) and O (2)

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

The data generated by this design are


computed using two way Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA) on post test result
Computation are analyzed as follows
If the post test mean of the experiment
group is significantly greater than mean of
first control group and the post test mean is
significantly higher than on the second group
If the average of differences between post
test scores of the experimental group and
those of the first group, second and third are
the same, the experiment must have
comparable effect.

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design No. 7. The Post test only


Control Group Design

In this design, there are two groups, one


of them are receiving the experimental
group.
Both are post tested but not pre tested
It is commonly confused with Design no. 3
but its difference the latter randomization
in Design no.7

TRUE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design No. 7. The Post test only Control


Group Design

The design illustrated by the following diagram:


R
R
Where:

x O (1)
x O (2)
R = random assignment
X =treatment
O (1) =experimental post
O (2)=control post test

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 8. The Time Series Experiment


This design is elaboration of the one group pretest-post test design involving just one group
It is pre tested four times and post tested four
times as well
The multi testing prevents the incidence of
maturation, testing and regression as threats in
validity
Pre-test treatment interaction may be also a
validity problem.
A variation of time series involving addition of a
control group

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 8. The Time Series


Experiment
O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7

O1

O2

O3

O4

x
O8

O1

O2

O3

O4 x O5

O5

O6

O6

O7

O8

O7

O8

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 9 Counterbalance


Designs

Is an experimental design which the


experimental treatments are arranged in
different sequence, in rotation method,
and counterbalanced method.
Ends as called Latin Square Arrangement.

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 9 Counterbalance Designs

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Latin Square can be rearranged by

this:

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Treatment of Data

To
determine
the
effectiveness
of
the
independent variable used in the experiment, the
average treatment is compared
The post test scores for all given the first
treatment can be compared with all the post test
scores and so on with the rest treatment

Latin Square experimental Design.


Can be used to determined the effectiveness of
the three treatments or three experimental
variables.

QUASI - EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Design no. 10.


The non- Equivalent Control Group Design

OxO
OxO
This design is considered as one of the most
widely used in educational research
Consisting two groups, pre and post test each
group
Broken lines between two groups suggest there
has no randomization.
It is commonly used with groups with
participants naturally such in a classroom

D. Factoral Designs
Factoral design are extensions of the true
experimental designs
Design 5 and 7 are made factoral by adding
more groups to take care of treatments and
more variables
Allows the researcher to measure not only the
main effect of each independent variable on
the dependent variable but also the interaction
effects of these independent variables
Ex.
2 kinds treatment on children in 2 mental ability
groups
2 kinds of production on two types of ropes.

1.
2.
3.

The purpose of factoral design is to evaluate


whether the effects of an experimental
variable are generalizable across all levels
of control variable.
The number of variables and levels will
depend on the problem.
There are four or more factors studied
for the following reasons
Posing more factors involve more subjects
Statistical Analysis after the treatment will
be difficult to compute
Interactions between and among variables
will be difficult to interpret.

ANOVA Analysis of Variance


ANOVA- can be used for both descriptive
and experimental design

ANOVA- One way classification


Ex. Descriptive- Comparing the performance
of three classes
Experimental- Determining the effects of
three kinds of chemicals, A, B, and C on the
strength of same types of ropes
Experimental: chemicals, A, B, and C
Control: same type of ropes

ANOVA: two way (Two Variables)


Example 1: Descriptive- Finding effects of age
and gender on English test
Example 2.Experiemental-Effects on fruits of
plants,
Using 1.) types of cultivation
2. Different volumes of water
ANOVA: three way (Three Variables)

Example 1. Descriptive Effects 1. age. 2. gender


3. socio economic status on licensure examination
Example 2. Experimental: Effects of three kinds of
disinfectant A, B, and Con staphycoccus.

Internal and External


Validity

A. Internal Validity

The Threats to Internal Validity


1. History
2. Maturation
3. Testing
4. Instrumentation
5. Statistical Regression
6. Selection
7. Mortality
8. Selection Maturation Interaction

External Validity
The Threats to external Validity
1. Pre-Test Treatment Interaction2. Selection Treatment Interaction
3. Specify Variables
4. Reactive Arrangement
5. Multiple Treatment Interference

THANK YOU AND


GODBLESS US
ALL!!!

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen