Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
THESIS PROPOSAL
ON
VERTICAL
HANDOVER
PRESENTED
BY:
AND
KIRAN MAHARJAN
DECISION
ALGORITHM FOR HETEREGENEOUS
WIRELESS
NETWORKS
I.S.E,HIST
COLLEGE
SEP., 2016
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Problem Statement
3. Objectives
4. Rationale of the study
5. Literature Review
6. Methodology
7. Expected Output
8. Time Schedule
9. References
1.Introduction
The current wireless systems consist of heterogeneous networks such
as cellular, Wi-Fi, WiMAX and other emerging access technologies.
With the advancement of technology the demand of connectivity and
mobility is also increasing
When a mobile equipment moves away from a base station or access
point the signal level degrades and there is a need to switch to another
base station .
Handover works on three phases
information gathering phase,
decision phase and
execution phase.
2. Problem statement
It is essential to offer an efficient handover mechanism to meet
different user requirements and maximize the resource utilization
of the network.
There are various metrics such as signal strength, bandwidth, bit
error rate, power consumption, and cost.
Due to different system characteristics, in vertical handover,
choice of efficient network should be made wisely in order to meet
the user expectation.
3.Objectives
Analysis of Quality of service in vertical handover between
WCDMA and WLAN.
Analysis of MADM (Multiple Attribute Decision Making) Decision
Algorithms for vertical handover (SAW and TOPSIS)
Comparison of different network environment for best Interface
selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks
4. Rationale of study
There is no single wireless network technology that is capable of
simultaneously providing a low latency, high bandwidth, and wide
area data service to a large number of mobile users
There is benefit of lower cost and higher bandwidth in WLAN and
better mobility support and larger coverage in UMTS.
With the implementation of Vertical handover, mobile users will be
connected to the best available networks that suit their service
requirements and switch between different networks based on their
service needs.
5. Literature Review
WLAN
UMTS2
Handover
Horizontal vs Vertical Handover
Traditionally, the handover decision, especially in case of
horizontal handovers, is made purely according to radio
signal strength (RSS) thresholds and hysteresis values as
input parameters. However, these parameters are not able to
present the whole performance of the network
6. Methodology
Analysis of different wireless interfaces according to bandwidth,
cost , QoS, user preference etc.
Simulation of heterogeneous network environments with different
attributes such as cost, bandwidth, delay etc
Evaluate the environment with MADM method i.e. SAW and
TOPSIS
7. Expected Output
For the different attribute such as receive level, cost,
bandwidth, user preference etc ranking of different
alternatives for WLAN and UMTS will be made using
MADM (SAW and TOPSIS) algorithm
8. Time Schedule
S.No.
Task
Duration
(Weeks)
Literature Review
Research Methodology
10
Report Preparation
9. References
http://searchdl.org/public/conference/2014/ITC/71.pdf
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jcnc/2015/539750/
AhmedA.,BoulahiaL.M.andGaitiD.(2014).EnablingVerticalHandoverDecisions
in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks: A State-of-the-Art and A Classication.
IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials.
Syed Amjad Iqbal, Muhammad AHMAD Lap Lambert Academic Publishing
GmbH KG, 2010. Performance Evaluation of Vertical Handover Between Umts
and Wlan.
Yan X., Sekercioglu Y. A. and Narayanan S. (2010). A Survey of Vertical
Handover Decision Algorithms in Fourth Generation Heterogeneous Wireless
Networks. Elsevier Computer Networks.
Paul Anthony Pangalos, University of London, 2004,Vertical
Handover,Techniques Over Heterogeneous Networks
THANK
YOU !