Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
clinicaloptions.com/oncology
TRASTUZUMAB EN ADYUVANCIA
MR2 SALLY PAREDES NOGUNI
HNERM ONCOLOGIA MEDICA
Efficacy endpoints
Primary: DFS
Cardiac endpoints
Primary: New York Heart Association class III or IV, confirmed by cardiologist, and LVEF < 50% and
10% below baseline or cardiac death
Secondary: LVEF < 50% and 10% below baseline with confirmation by repeat assessment;
patients with primary cardiac endpoint excluded
725 DFS events originally required to provide 80% power to detect HR: 0.80
trastuzumab following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2positive early breast cancer after median follow-up of 8 yrs
1. Gianni L, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:236-244. 2. Goldhirsch A, et al. SABCS 2012. Abstract S52.
Trastuzumab for
1 Yr
(n = 1552)
Trastuzumab for 2
Yrs
(n = 1553)
HR
(95% CI)
P
Value
0.99
.86
(0.85All patients
1.14)
3 yrs
86.7
89.1
5 yrs
81.0
81.6
8 yrs
76.0
75.8
1.05
.67
Hormone receptor
(0.85
positive patients*
1.29)
3 yrs
89.6
90.3
5 yrs
82.9
83.1
8 yrs
77.2
76.1
0.93
.51
Hormone receptor
(0.76
negative patients
1.14)
*92.6% received endocrine therapy. 2.8% received endocrine therapy.
3 yrs
83.8
87.8
5
No
difference
in
OS
between
1-yr
and
2-yr
trastuzumab
arms
through
8
yrs
of
yrs
78.9
80.1
median
follow-up
8
yrs
74.7
75.4
Goldhirsch A, et al. SABCS 2012. Abstract S5-2.
Trastuzumab for 2
Yrs
(n = 1553)
HR (95% CI)
P Value
1.05 (0.86-1.28)
.63
3 yrs
96.5
97.4
5 yrs
91.4
92.6
8 yrs
87.6
86.4
OS, %
All patients
Trastuzumab for
12 Mos
(n = 298)
85
97
Trastuzumab for
9 wks
(n = 181)
90
96
P
0.132
0.779
Left ventricular ejection fraction values every 3 mos; mammography every 6 mos up to 60 mos
Pivot X, et al. SABCS 2012. Abstract S5-3.
Trastuzumab for 12
Mos
(n = 1690)
10.4
1.1
0.6
6.4
0.4
1.5
0.4
DFS HR for 12 vs 6 mos of trastuzumab was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05-1.56; P = .29),
Trastuzumab
for 12 margin
Trastuzumab
for 6
with 95% CI that included prespecified
noninferiority
of 1.15, making
Mos
Mos
DFS,
probability,
%
results
inconclusive
regarding noninferiority
(n = 1690)
(n = 1690)
1 yr
97.0
95.5
2 yrs
93.8
91.2
3 yrs
90.7
87.8
4 yrs
87.8
84.9
Pivot X, et al. SABCS 2012. Abstract S5-3. Reproduced with permission.
Subgroup
Patients, n
ER negative, sequential
therapy
626
ER positive, sequential
therapy
850
ER negative, concurrent
therapy
786
ER positive, concurrent
therapy
1118
very low risk (no adverse factor, score = 0): node negative and tumour size 2 cm; low risk
(one adverse factor, score = 1): 13 positive nodes and tumour size 2 cm, or node negative
and tumour size >2 cm; intermediate risk (score = 2): 13 positive nodes and tumour size >2
cm, or >3 positive nodes and tumour size 2 cm; high risk (score = 3): >3 positive nodes and
tumor size >2 cm.