Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EVALUATION TOOLS
INTRODUCTIONS/
GROUND RULES
Introductions
Ground Rules
Ice Breaker Exercise
What is M&E?
Gender analysis
Project lifecycle
Data collection
Program design tools
Evaluations
Other tools
Image: www.pixabay.com
KEY TERMS
Indicator
Input
Output
Intermediate result
Outcome
Objective
Goal
Target
Baseline
Impact
Gender
Stakeholder
M&E DEFINED
Monitoring
Continuous
Ensures project on track
Identifies problems
Evaluation
Assesses whether project is achieving
objectives
Periodic
Focuses on outcomes and impacts
EXERCISE:
WHICH TOOLS? WHEN?
Multi-workshop training
program for women
political activists
Objective: Improve the
capacity of women to
run for elected office
Which data collection
tools? When?
EXAMPLE:
WHICH TOOLS? WHEN?
Workshops
Pre-and post questionnaires
Evaluation forms
In between events
Direct observation
End of project
Focus groups
In-depth interviews
Election results
Image: www.pixabay.com
GENDER ANALYSIS
Can be undertaken at any stage but
most effective if included in design
Systematic way of analyzing different
roles and impacts
Asks the who questions
How this will affect women and men?
CONTEXT ANALYSIS
Institutions or vehicles that have
positive or negative impact?
Key actors or factors that help or
hinder?
Socio-cultural, political and economic
environment?
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
All people who have a stake
Participants
Implementers
Decision-makers
Donors
Who are they?
What is their interest? Influence?
Power?
Relations with other stakeholders
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
Survey all people who have a stake
High
Low
High
Low
POWER
EXERCISE:
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
Program to enhance the capacity of the
Liberian legislature to represent
citizens interests
Identify stakeholders
Plot them on chart
Photo: NDI
PROBLEM ANALYSIS
OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
Links problem analysis to program
design
Provides visual map
Defines scope of program
Maps out pathway of change
Identifies what will be monitored and
evaluated
Facilitates planning and management
OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS
Core problem reframed as objective
Root causes reframed as intermediate
results
INDICATORS
Qualitative versus quantitative
SMART
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Relevant
Time-bound
Negative effects reframed become
indicators
Photo: www.pixabay.com
CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS
Factors outside our control
Conditions under which program logic
will hold true
Conditions likely to affect achievement
of results
Identify at each level of framework
Image: www.pixabay.com
RESOURCE PLAN
What resources are needed for:
Staff time and materials for setting up an
M&E system
Evaluation activities
RESULTS FRAMEWORK
Links evaluation strategy to problem
analysis
Helps identify indicators
Aids in M&E
Clarifies logic of project
Provides roadmap for planning and
management
EXAMPLE: FRAMEWORK
EXERCISE:
RESULTS FRAMEWORK
PROGRAM EVALUATION
Types of evaluations:
Baseline
Mid-term
Final
Impact
Internal versus external
EXAMPLE: ASSESSMENTS
Win with Women
Political Party Assessment Tool
PROGRAM EVALUATION
Steps
Determine evaluability
Select research questions
Identify methods for data collection
Develop and test data collection
instruments and protocols
EVENT EVALUATIONS
Verbal feedback
Evaluation forms
Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires
IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS
Photo: NDI
FOCUS GROUPS
Why and how strongly people hold
opinions
Cant project results to wider
population
Groups formed around common
characteristics
Six to ten people and moderator
Open-ended questions
SURVEYS
Photo: NDI