RF Tuning Guideline

RF Tuning Guideline
Dec-2016
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Contents
Coverage Optimization Goal
MR Activation and Analysis
PCR Tilting Flow
RF Analysis Workflow
Coverage
Optimization Goal
MR Collection and
Analysis
PCR Tilting Flow
RF Analysis
Workflow
Coverage, Pilot Pollution, SHO

overhead
MR Collection
PCR Tilting Flow
MR Capability and Analysis
Poor Coverage
Poor Dominance
Handover Issue
Bad Ec/Io
Pilot Pollution

MR Collection and Analysis
PCR Tilting Flow
List of RF optimization objectives

Index
Reference
Distance
Remarks
RxQual 5 dB
95%
>100m
Voice
RxLev -95 dBm
95%
>100m
Voice
CPICH Ec/Io 14dB
95%
>100m
Voice
CPICH RSCP 92dBm
95%
>100m
Voice
SHO Factor based on DT
<45%
Overall
Voice (Greening)
Overall
Via OSS (Greening)
>100m
Voice
>100m
Voice
2G
3G
PRACH (%) within ISD > 80%
Pilot pollution ratio
5%
UE Tx Power 15 dBm
RSRP
95%
>100m
Data
SINR
95%
>100m
Data
4G


RSCP Coverage
PCR Tilting Flow

Ec/Io Coverage
Network Coverage
MR can display RSCP, Ec/Io
for each carrier to find the
poor coverage area on the
map.
Pilot Pollution
Best Server
Network Pilot
Pollution
From the pilot pollution

map, get the more
serious pilot pollution
area.
From the Best server map,
get the cell coverage range.
AMR Traffic
PS Traffic
With this two map analyze

which cell cause the pilot
pollution.
Network Hot Spots
MR can accurately identify

hot spots based on RAB
traffic service.
These spots can be
highlight for capacity
upgrade f necessary.
MR Activation
PCR Tilting Flow

PCR Tilting Flow
MR
and Tilting
Drive/Walk
test
Start
PCR
logs
No
No
Fix installation
*Implemented
standard
mechanical tilt
PCR Tilting Flow is to indicate

priorities between mechanical
tilting, electrical tilting and CPICH
power setting.
Standard
mechanical tilt
Azimuth physical tuning

guideline is included RF
Optimization Flow.
Yes
Implement
electrical tilt.
ET = max?
Yes
No
Need side lobe coverage?

(such as outer area)
Yes
Done
Implement mechanical tilt.

MT = 6 (max)?
Yes
No
Keep CPICH at 10%.

Optimized?
Done
Yes
Yes
No
Need indoor penetration?
Re-engineering
Yes
*subject to change from optimization point of view.
Reduce CPICH
Minimum 5%. Optimized?
No
Re-engineering
ISD vs. Height Tilting Table

3G Tilting Table
PCR Tilting Flow
4G Tilting Table
Site To
Distanc
e
15
100
200
300
400
500 6
560 6
600 6
700 5
800 5
810 5
900 5
1000 5
1100 5
1200 5
1220 5
1300 5
1400 5
1500 5
1600 5
1700 5
1800 5
1900 5
2000 4
2100 4
2200 4
2300 4
2400 4
2500 4
2600 4
2700 4
2800 4
2900 4
3000 4
20
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
25
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
27
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
29
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
30
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
35
8
8
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
38
9
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
40
9
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
45
9
9
9
8
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
50
10
9
9
8
8
8
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Multi Sector Tilting and Azimuth Design

PCR Tilting Flow
Generally, keep the dual beam total tilt as before, E-tilt

as higher priority.
If original tilt >10
E-tilt = 8and M-tilt = original tilt - 8
Else
M-tilt = 2 and E-tilt = original tilt 2
For different beam of one antenna the M-tilt should be
same.
E.g.:
Original
M-tilt
E-tilt
Plan
Total
M-tilt
E-tilt
Total
10Electric tilt
10
10
10Mechanical tilt
Using E-tilt can control the side lobe interference

more efficiently.
Azimuth will be same as before multi-sector
LTE Red Site Solution Optimization Guideline

Tilting Optimization for RED site with NEW site solution
I.
Overshooting RED site

1.
If less than 80% of TA samples located within **ISD, considered overshooting and need to downtilt as per tilting table.
II. RED and NEW site Tilting Standard

1.
If NEW site is within RED site sector 90 horizontal beamwidth AND
a.
Distance of RED *TA vs. RED to NEW site is more than 80%, then implement max(tilting table, +4) tilting on RED site. NEW site
follow tilting table.
b.
Distance of RED *TA vs. RED to NEW site is within 50%-80%, then implement max(tilting table, +2) tilting on RED site. NEW site
follow tilting table.
c.
Distance of RED *TA vs. RED to NEW site is within 30%-50%, then implement +2 tilting on RED site. NEW site implement -2
(uptilt).
d.
Distance of RED *TA vs. RED to NEW site is less than 30%, propose other
solution (LTE 15Mhz or Multi-sector).
2.
If NEW site is outside RED site sector 90 horizontal beamwidth by 9020, will be optimized on case by case basis to determine optimized tilt.
The objective is share the load of RED site with new site until RED site becomes green and/or both RED and NEW site load is balanced.
RED site
TA area
*TA : RED existing site 80% MR cell coverage

**ISD: Average distance (dA, dB, dC)
where dA, dB, dC are 1st tier nearest neighbors

Azimuth Optimization for RED site with NEW site solution
I.
The decision to implement proper azimuth must be based on actual physical configuration (not on database). Hence, it is necessary to perform
site audit at least both RED site and NEW site.
II. RED and NEW site face to face azimuth

1.
Change NEW site azimuth at least 10 difference with RED site, in the best possible direction considering users area, surrounding site azimuth,
angle between antennas, blocking, etc. Samples of proper azimuths are illustrated on the figure below.
III. NEW site azimuth not optimized based on high traffic area to be shared with RED site
1.
Change NEW site azimuth according to high user area while maintaining proper azimuth design if possible.
IV. NEW site azimuth not optimized based on design
1.
Change NEW site azimuth based on proper azimuth design
Proper Azimuth Configurations

RF Justification for RED site with NEW site solution
I.
NEW site blocking or no line-of-sight

1.
Blocked antennas are defined as sites who have an obstructing structure in a certain important direction, or just do not have clutter clearance
based on site audit (TSSR) panoramic photo line-of-sight to target coverage (high users area served by RED site).
2.
Need to check possible new solution like re-engineering (NEW site), LTE 15Mhz, multi-sector and new LTE physical site.
II. RED site azimuth need to adjust to optimize according to higher user area
1.
The RED site is still red after new site solution due to RED site re-azimuth to higher user area which increases the utilization further compared to
original azimuth.
2.
Need to provide another solution such as LTE 15Mhz, multi-sector or new LTE physical site.
III. NEW site azimuth need to adjust to optimize according to higher user area, but not intended for RED site
1.
The RED site is still red after new site solution due to NEW site re-azimuth to higher user area near the NEW site. Hence, making the NEW site
incapable of taking enough load from RED site to make it green.
2.
Need to provide another solution such as LTE 15Mhz, multi-sector or new LTE physical site.
IV. LTE new site solution for 3G RED site
1.
Perform layering parameter audit GUL based on NPT to make sure everything is proper, specially L2U and U2L.
2.
LTE coverage based on SSO drive test must be in accordance with coverage prediction or better.
3.
Need to verify the users in the LTE coverage area if the SIM cards of LTE capable handsets (min 350 based on planning criteria), if registered and
can use the LTE network.
3G RF Analysis Workflow
MR and Drive/Walk test

logs
Compare measurements with target
quality and coverage thresholds
Poor Coverage
(RSCP)
Poor Dominance
Handover
Problem
Bad Ec/No
Pilot Pollution
Non-optimum RF
Land terrain
Planning/Engineerin
g
Yes
A
Poor
Coverage
CPICH Ec/No =>

target threshold -14
dBm
No
No
Yes
Good coverage
Missing neighbor
Overlap Coverage
Clock sync alarm
Overlap Coverage
Land Terrain
Truncation
Land Terrain
Planning/Engineerin
g
Parameter
discrepancy
Planning/Engineerin
g
Cross feeder
Handov
er
Problem
1. Overshooting
2. UL coverage
limited
3. Cross-feeder
Non-optimum RF
High RTWP
No
Amount of SC within 5dB

RSCP from best SC >3
Yes
High Load
High antenna
height
Handover fail OR
Detected RSCP > Active RSCP
Yes
Dominance Area OK?

PRACH > ISD is <10%
or SHO OH is <50%
Non-optimum RF
High antenna
height
Hardware/Availabilit
y
CPICH RSCP =>

target threshold -92
dBm
Antenna blocking
No
PCR Tilting Flow
No
Bad
Ec/No
Yes
1. Pilot pollution
2. High SHO
overhead
A. Poor Coverage (RSCP)

PCR Tilting Flow
MR or DT logs
RSCP <-92 dBm @
> 100m
Yes
Site Availability Issue
Identify alarm and

escalate to Project/BSS
No
Building
Clutter
Other antennas
Billboard
Shadowing
Valley/mountain
slopes
Elevator/Toilet
Buildings w/o DAS
Houses with thick
walls
Tunnels
Antenna height
ISD or target
distance
Antenna type
Antenna direction
Antenna tilting
LOS
High VSWR (>2) or

Poor material quality
Yes
Escalate to project team

for installation checking
No
Antenna
Blocking
Yes
Possible to achieve
coverage target by PCR
(re-pan, tilt)
No
Terrain and enclosed

areas
Fix installation
RRU not on-top
Antenna middle of
building
Mechanical bracket
stuck
Antenna cannot repan
No
Yes
Yes
No
Site Audit and/or RF

optimization possibility
No
Yes
Physical tuning, CPICH

and parameter tuning
Repeater
Femto cell
Overshooti
PCR not
ng:
possible
Wrong
due to
antenna
bad
type of
installatio
antenna
n
Target
too high
Macro:
ISD
coverage
too far
small, no
(>1km)
indoor and
Indoor: no
penetration
DAS/lamp
loss too high but hot spot
Change
antenna
Using antenna
gain too high (ex.
in highway).
Antenna
Lowering
Antenna height
too high even
down-tilt max
(Height/ISD
>5%).
New
Site/Easy
Macro/Comba
t
Strong
justification
based on
coverage /
quality /
capacity
A. Poor Coverage (RSCP)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PCR Tilting Flow
Non-Optimum RF
Too much down-tilt will make DL coverage limited in cell edge. Too much up-tilt on the other hand, will make inner cell coverage poor (under the
site) particularly for high antenna sites (>45m). Generally mechanical tilt is standardized based on antenna height vs. ISD, then electrical tilt as a
priority to balance the coverage.
CPICH power must be on the 5%-10% range with respect to maximum DL power to maintain power balance in DL/UL and penetration loss.
Antenna Blocking
Blocked antennas are defined as sites who have an obstructing structure in a certain important direction, or just do not have clutter clearance.
Hardware or Availability Issue
Poor material quality such as feeder, jumper, antenna, etc. can impact to high VSWR (>1.5) and increase RF propagation loses. Some camouflage
sites also use non-RF transparent material to conceal the antennas, the RF energy in turn reflects and scatters in many directions.
Site with transmission or availability alarm can impact not only to coverage but also to revenue loss and poor user experience, and need to be
fixed as first priority.
Land Terrain, Establishments and Indoors
Enclosed areas such as tunnels, underground garage, elevators, valleys, houses with thick walls, basement, etc. can make coverage poor due to
high penetration loss.
These coverage holes can be solved by heterogenic network using small cells, femto cell, repeaters and specific antenna types to fill coverage holes.
Planning and Engineering
Bad antenna positioning /installation these sites have antennas mounted inappropriately for the coverage objective. This could be a result of
recent modifications to the site by other operators/entities or simply poor planning.
Bad antenna type - these sites have antenna types either inappropriate for the coverage objective or from manufacturers of questionable quality
leading to unpredictable cell footprints. Usually a result of poor antenna strategy and planning.
Bad RRU positioning - these sites unnecessarily have the RRU mounted too far from the antenna, or in some cases not using an RRU at all. If the
coverage objective requires max coverage, then RRUs should be mounted as close to the antenna as possible.
B. Poor Dominance/Overshooting/UL limited

PCR Tilting Flow
From MR or DT logs
RSCP > -92 dBm and
Ec/No >- 14 dB but
Poor Dominance
Yes
Identify alarm and

No
Building
Clutter
Other antennas
Billboard
Shadowing
Valley/mountain
slopes
Elevator/Toilet
Buildings w/o DAS
Houses with thick
walls
Tunnels
Antenna height
ISD or target
distance
Antenna type
Antenna direction
Antenna tilting
LOS
High VSWR (>2) and/or

Cross feeder
Yes
Escalate to project team

for installation checking
No
Antenna
Blocking
Yes
Possible to achieve
(re-pan, tilt)
No

areas
Fix installation
RRU not on-top
Antenna middle of
building
Mechanical bracket
stuck
No
Yes
Yes
No

(Overlap coverage)
No
Yes

Repeater
Femto cell
Overshooti
PCR not
ng:
possible
Wrong
due to
antenna
bad
type of
installatio
antenna
n
Target
too high
Macro:
ISD
coverage
too far
small, no
(>1km)
indoor and
Indoor: no
penetration
DAS/lamp
Change
antenna
Using antenna
gain too high (ex.
in highway).
Antenna
Lowering
Antenna height
too high even
down-tilt max
(Height/ISD
>5%).
New
Site/Easy
Macro/Comba
t
Strong
justification
based on
coverage /
quality /
capacity
B. Poor Dominance/Overshooting/UL limited

1.
2.
3.
Too much Up-Tilt or High CPICH Power
Too much up-tilt with respect to target coverage area (planning), will
result to bigger DL coverage but limited in UL coverage that result to
poor user experience. Generally mechanical tilt is standardized based
on antenna height vs. ISD, then electrical tilt as a priority to balance
the DL coverage.
CPICH power must be on the 5%-10% range with respect to

maximum DL power to maintain power balance in DL/UL and
penetration loss.
High Antenna Height
High sites are defined as sites who are too high compared to the
inter-site distance and coverage objective.
High sites will cause interference to other sites as the RF is harder

to control from a high site. Also, will get too much traffic as they
commonly cover too large an area.
To initially produce potentially high sites, it is recommended to set

parameters antenna height > 40m and with ratio antenna height / ISD
> 5 or 6%.
Overlap Coverage
Azimuth optimization includes angle separation between antenna from

intra NodeB and neighbours. Antenna azimuth should not be directed
along the road to avoid overshooting.
PCR Tilting Flow

4.
5.
5.
Cross-feeder
After drive test and before RF optimization analysis, RF engineer have

to verify serving cells dominance first to make sure all cells are
propagating properly to their intended coverage area.
Cross-feeders need to be fixed on site and trace the feeder to swap

based on engineering sector plan.
Land Terrain, Establishments and Buildings
Sites built on the mountain or mountain slopes tend to

overshoot on the low lands due to high terrain with respect to sea
level. The planning team need to consider this scenario to apply
proper antenna type (low gain) and height.
Antennas that are facing glass building/materials tend to reflect and

overshoot. Need to re-pan or tilt in optimum coverage area to avoid
reflection.
Bad antenna positioning /installation- these sites have antennas

mounted inappropriately for the coverage objective. This could be a
result of recent modifications to the site by other operators/entities or
simply poor planning. Antennas mounted with fixed bracket cannot be
down-tilted which result to overshooting even with maximum electrical
tilt.
Bad antenna type - these sites have antenna types either

inappropriate for the coverage objective or from manufacturers of
questionable quality leading to unpredictable cell footprints. Usually a
result of poor antenna strategy and planning, such as high gain
antenna on a mountain slopes can cause overshooting.
C. Handover Problem
PCR Tilting Flow
From MR or DT
logs
RSCP > -92 dBm
but
Ec/No <- 14 dB and
Handover fail
Clock
synchronization
Issue
Yes
Identify alarm and

No
Missing Neighbor and

not overshooting
Yes
Add neighbor if necessary
No
Yes
High RTWP
No
Neighbor Truncation
Yes
Fix installation
RRU not on-top
Antenna middle of
building
Mechanical bracket
stuck
If Min RTWP > -102

when DCH UE 2, check FFT.
Else, check if can share load
to neighbor.
Possible to achieve
(re-pan, tilt)
Remove unnecessary
neighbor
No
Yes
Overshooting. Possible
to optimize?
No

Repeater
Femto cell
Overshooti
PCR not
ng:
possible
Wrong
due to
antenna
bad
type of
installatio
antenna
n
Target
too high
Macro:
ISD
coverage
too far
small, no
(>1km)
indoor and
Indoor: no
penetration
DAS/lamp
Change
antenna
Using antenna
gain too high (ex.
in highway).
Antenna
Lowering
Antenna height
too high even
down-tilt max
(Height/ISD
>5%).
New
Site/Easy
Macro/Comba
t
Strong
justification
based on
coverage /
quality /
capacity
C. Handover Problem
1.
2.
3.
PCR Tilting Flow
Missing Neighbor
Planned neighbors must be defined based on engineering parameter and topographical analysis until 2nd tier or based on site density and priority
(layering).
Optimized neighbors can be done through drive test measurements (detected set) and OSS statistics cell to cell handovers.
High RTWP
High RTWP can cause handover fail when the handover procedure is not completed due to UL coverage limitation, thus the UE is located in cell
edge and/or UE power is already at maximum and cannot maintain RL quality and NodeB cannot decode UE UL messages.
Clock Synchronization Issue
IP clock alarm impact - The base station fails to synchronize to theIPclockreference. The systemclockmay be unusable if the base station does
not obtain theclockreference for a long period of time. As a result, the quality of services of the base station decreases, resulting in handover failure
and call drop. In certain cases, the base station cannot provide services.
Need to escalate to BSS team and area owner for resolution.
4.
Neighbor Truncation
Each cell can be configured maximum 64 intra-frequency neighbors, 64 inter-frequency neighbors and 64 inter-RAT neighbours.
If the number of the cells will be put in measurement controlis more than maximum number of neighboring cells, RNC will delete the neighboring
cells whose repeated numberof neighbor occurrence is lesser.
Necessary neighbors might be deleted/truncated if unnecessary neighbors are repeated more in active set cells.
5.
Parameter Discrepancy
Handover parameter check need to check handover parameters if set to extreme values. Below are basic intra-handover parameters for
Parameter ID
Standard Value
Remarks
reference.
IntraRelThdFor1A
CS: 6 (3dB) PS: 4 (2

dB)
IntraRelThdFor1B
CS: 12 (6dB) PS: 8 (4

dB)
Hystfor1A
Hystfor1B
Hystfor1C
8 (4 dB)
D. Bad Ec/No
PCR Tilting Flow
From MR or DT logs
RSCP > -92 dBm but
Ec/No <- 14 dB and
Dominance OK and
No handover issue
TCP Utilization
> 45 dBm?
No
Check
overshooting,
1st tier
neighbor
Pilot pollution or cross feeder
DL/UL load <40%?
No
Move to Solution B
(Overshooting/Cross feeder)
Fix installation
RRU not on-top
Antenna middle of
building
Mechanical bracket
stuck
Yes
Dominance OK
Yes
1st tier neighbor

Capacity >40%?
F3, multi-sector, U900
Share load to neighbour

by PCR possible
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Additional cells upgrade

for bad Ec/No OK?
(F3, U900, multi)
No

Repeater
Femto cell
Overshooti
PCR not
ng:
possible
Wrong
due to
antenna
bad
type of
installatio
antenna
n
Target
too high
Macro:
ISD
coverage
too far
small, no
(>1km)
indoor and
Indoor: no
penetration
DAS/lamp
Change
antenna
Using antenna
gain too high (ex.
in highway).
Antenna
Lowering
Antenna height
too high even
down-tilt max
(Height/ISD
>5%).
New
Site/Easy
Macro/Comba
t
Strong
justification
based on
coverage /
quality /
capacity
D. Bad Ec/No
1.
PCR Tilting Flow
High DL Load
TCP utilization or DL load (own cell interference) is inversely proportional to Ec/Io, thus the higher the DL load, the lower the
Ec/Io value.
Ec/Io (dB) = RSCP / RSSI = CPICH / Ior (own cell interference) + Ioc (neighbor cell interference) + No (noise background)
Sample cell JATIBARUTANAHABANGSTPHZ2
CPICH Power
TCP Utilization (peak)
: 34.5 dBm
: 45.6 dBm (90%)
Ec/Io (dB) = 34.5 dBm 45.6 dBm = -11.1 dB (not included neighbor interference and noise background yet)
Mean TCP vs. TP0 Ec/No
The higher the

TCP,
the lower the
Ec/No
E. Pilot pollution / High SHO Overhead

PCR Tilting Flow
From MR or DT logs
RSCP > -92 dBm but
Ec/No <- 14 dB and
SC > 3 within 5 dB
RSCP from best
server
Yes
Identify alarm and

Fix installation
RRU not on-top
Antenna middle of
building
Mechanical bracket
stuck
No
Height / ISD >5%
Overlapping Coverage
(Face to face antenna)
Yes
No
Valley/mountain
slopes
High height above
sea level
Antenna height
ISD or target
distance
Antenna type
Antenna direction
Antenna tilting
LOS
High Antenna Height
Yes
Possible to achieve
(re-pan, tilt)
No

areas
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes

No

Repeater
Femto cell
Overshooti
PCR not
ng:
possible
Wrong
due to
antenna
bad
type of
installatio
antenna
n
Target
too high
Macro:
ISD
coverage
too far
small, no
(>1km)
indoor and
Indoor: no
penetration
DAS/lamp
Change
antenna
Using antenna
gain too high (ex.
in highway).
Antenna
Lowering
Antenna height
too high even
down-tilt max
(Height/ISD
>5%).
New
Site/Easy
Macro/Comba
t
Strong
justification
based on
coverage /
quality /
capacity
E. Pilot pollution / High SHO Overhead

1.
2.
PCR Tilting Flow
Too much Up-Tilt or High CPICH Power
Too much up-tilt with respect to target coverage area (planning), will result to bigger DL coverage but limited in UL coverage that result to poor
user experience. Generally mechanical tilt is standardized based on antenna height vs. ISD, then electrical tilt as a priority to balance the DL
coverage.
CPICH power must be on the 5%-10% range with respect to maximum DL power to maintain power balance in DL/UL and penetration loss.
High Antenna Height
High sites are defined as sites who are too high compared to the inter-site distance and coverage objective.
High sites will cause interference to other sites as the RF is harder to control from a high site. Also, will get too much traffic as they commonly
cover too large an area.
To initially produce potentially high sites, it is recommended to set parameters antenna height > 40m and with ratio antenna height / ISD > 5 or 6%.
3.
Overlap Coverage
Homogenous azimuth (with tolerance) is implemented for good site gridding/location and to avoid overlap coverage. 3 main azimuth rules as
below to avoid overlap coverage.
4.
Land Terrain, Establishments and Buildings
Sites built on the mountain or mountain slopes tend to overshoot on the low lands due to high terrain with respect to sea level. The planning
team need to consider this scenario to apply proper antenna type (low gain) and height.
Antennas that are facing glass building/materials tend to reflect and overshoot. Need to re-pan or tilt in optimum coverage area to avoid reflection.
Bad antenna positioning /installation- these sites have antennas mounted inappropriately for the coverage objective. This could be a result of
recent modifications to the site by other operators/entities or simply poor planning. Antennas mounted with fixed bracket cannot be down-tilted
which result to overshooting even with maximum electrical tilt.
5.

RF Tuning Guideline - With LTE Red Site New Site Optimization

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

RF Tuning Guideline - With LTE Red Site New Site Optimization

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

MR Activation and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow

PCR Tilting Flow

Coverage, Pilot Pollution, SHO

PCR Tilting Flow

MR Capability and Analysis

Coverage Optimization Goal

MR Collection and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow

List of RF optimization objectives

RxLev -95 dBm

CPICH Ec/Io 14dB

CPICH RSCP 92dBm

SHO Factor based on DT

Via OSS (Greening)

MR Collection and Analysis

MR Collection and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow

From the pilot pollution

With this two map analyze

Network Hot Spots

MR can accurately identify

PCR Tilting Flow

MR Collection and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow

PCR Tilting Flow is to indicate

Azimuth physical tuning

Need side lobe coverage?

Implement mechanical tilt.

Keep CPICH at 10%.

Need indoor penetration?

*subject to change from optimization point of view.

ISD vs. Height Tilting Table

MR Collection and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow

Multi Sector Tilting and Azimuth Design

MR Collection and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow

Generally, keep the dual beam total tilt as before, E-tilt

Using E-tilt can control the side lobe interference

LTE Red Site Solution Optimization Guideline

Overshooting RED site

II. RED and NEW site Tilting Standard

*TA : RED existing site 80% MR cell coverage

LTE Red Site Solution Optimization Guideline

II. RED and NEW site face to face azimuth

Proper Azimuth Configurations

LTE Red Site Solution Optimization Guideline

NEW site blocking or no line-of-sight

MR Collection and Analysis

MR and Drive/Walk test

CPICH Ec/No =>

Clock sync alarm

Amount of SC within 5dB

Dominance Area OK?

CPICH RSCP =>

PCR Tilting Flow

A. Poor Coverage (RSCP)

MR Collection and Analysis

PCR Tilting Flow