Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2/28/17
Free vibrations of SDOF systems
Consider the vibration of an SDOF system with damping included but still with
no external force
If c = 2(km) the system is said to be critically damped and will return to its
equilibrium position without oscillating. In general c is much smaller than this,
giving an underdamped system.
The figure below shows the response of SDOF systems with natural period 1 s
and different damping ratios, when released from an initial unit displacement.
This damped response differ, from the underdamped case in two ways: first the
oscillations are multiplied by an exponential decay term ( ), so that they
die away quit quickly; second, he natural frequency hasChamil
Prepared by: Eng. beenDuminda
altered by the
Mahagamage
factor . However, for practical values
2 of damping this factor is very
B.Sc.Eng (Hons),close
C Eng,
MIE(SL)
2/28/17
Suppose first of all that the ground motion varies sinusoidally with time at a
circular frequency, , with corresponding period T = 2/ :
Following figures show the variation of structural acceleration with time for a
structure with a natural period of 0.5s and 5% damping, for a variety of
frequencies of ground shaking.
The same three response regimes are evident in this figure, with the structural
motion equal to the ground motion at the left hand end of the graph, then large
resonant amplifications at around Tn/T=1, and finally very low displacements
when Tn/T is large.
EC8 specifies two categories of spectra. Type 1 for areas of high seismicity
(defines as Ms > 5.5), and type 2 for areas of moderate seismicity (Ms 5.5).
Within each category, spectra are given for five different soil types:
A rock ; B very dense sand or gravel, or very stiff clay; C dense sand or
gravel , or stiff clay; D loose to medium cohesionless soil, or soft to firm
cohesive soil; E soil profiles with a surface layer of alluvium of thickness 5-20
m.
The vertical axis is the peak, or spectral acceleration of the elastic structure,
denoted by Se, normalized by ag, the design ground acceleration on type A
ground. The spectra are plotted for an assumed structural damping ratio of 5%.
This must be in dynamic equilibrium with the stiffness force developed within
the structure. If we define the spectral displacement, SD, as the peak
absolute displacement corresponding to the spectral acceleration, S e,
then
kSD = mSe
Using the relationships between mass, stiffness and natural period
Note -: While the force experienced depends on the mass, the spectral
acceleration and displacement do not they are functions only of the natural
period and damping ratio.
It should also be remembered that the spectral acceleration is absolute (i.e it is
the acceleration of the mass relative to the ground plus the ground
acceleration, hence proportional to the inertia force experienced by the mass),
but the spectral displacement is the displacement of the mass relative to the
ground (and hence proportional to the spring force).
While elastic spectra are useful tools for design and assessment, they do not
account for the inelasticity that will occur during severe earthquakes. In
practice, energy absorption and plastic redistribution can be used to reduce the
design forces significantly. This is dealt with in EC8 by thee modification of the
elastic spectra to give design spectra Sd.
It is essential to ensure that the structure does indeed fail by a ductile mode
well before brittle failure modes develop, i.e. that ductility supply exceeds the
maximum ductility demand.
This principle known as Capacity Design
For SDOF system with a clear yield point the displacement ductility is defined
Yielding of a structure also has the effect of limiting the peak force that it must
sustain. In EC8 this force reduction is quantified by the behavior factor, q:
A well known empirical observation is that, at long periods (>Tc), yielding and
elastic structures undergo roughly the same peak displacement. It follows that,
for these structures, the force reduction is simply equal to the ductility. At
shorter periods, the amount of force reduction achieved for a given ductility
reduces.
Over most of the period range (for T TB) the spectral accelerations Sd (and
hence the design forces) are a factor of q times lower than the values Se for
the equivalent elastic system. For a theoretical, infinitely stiff system (zero
period), ductility does not imply any reduction in spectral acceleration, since an
infinitely stiff structure will not undergo any deformation and will simply move
with the ground beneath it. A linear interpolation is used between periods of
zero & TB.
For long period structures (T>Tc) the result of this approach will be that design
forces are reduced by the factor q compared to an elastic design, and the
displacement of the ductile system is the same as for an equivalent elastic
system (since q = in this period range). For TB< T < TC the same force
reduction will be achieved but displacements will be slightly greater than the
elastic case. For very stiff structures (T<TB) the benefits of ductility are reduced,
with smaller force reductions and large displacements compared to the elastic
case.
Prepared by: Eng. Chamil Duminda Mahagamage
18 B.Sc.Eng (Hons), C Eng,
MIE(SL)
2/28/17
Note-: Use of ductility modified spectra is reasonable for SDOF systems, but
should be applied with caution to MDOF structures. For elastic systems we have
seen that an accurate dynamic analysis can be performed by considering the
response of the structure in each of its vibration modes, then combining the
modal responses. A similar approach is widely used for inelastic structures, i.e
each mode is treated as an SDOF system and its ductility-modified response
determined as above. The modal responses are then combined by a method
such as SRSS. For linear systems, the method is based on the fact that any
deformation can be treated as a linear combination of the mode shapes. Once
the structure yields, its properties change and these mode shapes no longer
apply.
When yielding is evenly spread throughout the structure, the
deformed shape of the plastic structure is likely to be similar to the
elastic one, and the ductility modified response spectrum analysis may
give reasonable (though by no mean precise) results. If, however,
yielding is concentrated in certain parts of the structure, such as a
soft storey, then this procedure likely to be substantially in error and
one of the non-linear analysis method shall be used.
Not all structures can be realistically modelled as SDOF systems. Structures with
distributed mass and stiffness may undergo significant deformations in several
modes of vibration and therefore need to be analyzed as MDOF systems. These
are not generally amenable to hand solution and so computer methods are
widely used.
For a system with N degrees of freedom it is possible to write a set of
equations of motion in matrix form
Where is the mode shape, which is a function solely of position within the
structure. This two can be solved to
The figure above shows the sway modes of vibration of a four storey shear type
building (i.e one with relatively stiff floors, so that lateral deformations are
dominated by shearing deformation between floors), with the modes numbered
in order of ascending natural frequency (or descending period).
Having determined the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the system, we
can go on to analyze the response to an applied load. The equation
is a set of N coupled equations in terms of the N degrees of freedom.
This can be most easily solved using the principle of modal superposition, which
states that any set of displacements can be expressed as a linear combination
of the mode shapes:
modal displacements are functions only of time, while the mode shapes are
functions only of position. So that the above equation allows to transform the
equations of motion into a set of equations in term of the modal displacements
rather than the original degrees of freedom.
Where Y is the vector of modal displacements, and M, C and K are the modal
mass, stiffness and damping matrices. Because of the orthogonality properties
of the modes, it turns out that M, C and K are all diagonal matrices, so that the
N number of equations in above equation are uncoupled, i.e. each mode acts as
an SDOF system and is independent of the responses in all other modes. Then
the each line of above equation has the following form.
The above 4 equations are giving only the peak values in each mode, and it is
unlikely that these peaks will all occur at the same point in time. Simple
combination rules are used to give an 26 Prepared of
estimate by: the
Eng. Chamil
total Duminda
response.Mahagamage
Two
B.Sc.Eng (Hons), C Eng,
methods are permitted by EC8. MIE(SL)
2/28/17
If the above condition not met the most widely accepted alternative is
the CQC (complete quadratic combination) (Wilson et al, 1981), which
is based on calculating correlation coefficient between two modes.
This is built into many dynamic analysis computer programs.
storeys with T1<2Tc, and is 1.0 otherwise. The total horizontal load is then
distributed over the height of the building in proportion to (mass x mode shape).
Normally this is done by making some simple assumption about the mode
shape. For instance, for simple, regular buildings EC8 permits the assumption
that the first mode shape is a straight line (i.e displacement is directly
proportional to height). This leads to a storey force at level k given by:
The example building represents a hotel, with a single storey podium housing
the public spaces of the hotel, surmounted by a seven storey tower block,
comprising a central corridor with bedrooms to either side. Figures below show a
schematic plan, a section and an isometric view of the building. Assuming the
building is regular in plan and elevation (will be shown later) calculate the
followings.