Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Under Guidance of
Presented by
Dr Rajesh Choudhary Gagandeep Singh Bagga
HOD, MIMIT Research Scholar, MIMIT
Malout Malout
4/11/17 1
Plan of Presentation
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Details
.DOE (Design of Experiments)
.Rotary attachment of EDD
3. Results and discussions
4. Conclusions
5. References
4/11/17 2
Introduction
4/11/17 7
Rotary attachment of EDDM
4/11/17 11
Contd..
Higher the current
higher the MRR due to
higher thermal energy
incidented on
workpiece.
Higher the pulse on-
time means higher is
the window of time
available for thermal
Fig. 6. 3-D surface plot for SN ratio for
energy to indent over MRR.
workpiece.
4/11/17 12
Contd..
Table 3. ANOVA Table for Means
P value of current is Source DF Seq.SS Adj.SS F P Adj.M
S
minimum in ANOVA table Polarity 1 0.000 0.000 0.35 0.568 0.000
suggesting current has 001 001 001
Current 2 0.000 0.000 16.13 0.002 0.000
highest impact of the 055 055 055
Response parameter Pulse 2 0.000 0.000 0.21 0.813 0.000
on-time 001 001 001
MRR.
Pulse 2 0.000 0.000 0.56 0.591 0.000
off-time 002 002 002
Polarity* 2 0.000 0.000 0.07 0.929 0.000
P 0.5 means the current 000 000 000
parameter has highest Residua 8
l error
0.000
014
0.000
014
0.000
014
impact. Total 17 0.000
072
Current
4/11/17
has P value = 13
Conclusions
Effect of current, pulse on time, pulse off time on material removal rate of Al
alloy 6061 is concluded. Taguchis L18 orthogonal array is used for design of
experiments. ANOVA analysis was carried out to study the Experiments Results.
Following conclusions were drawn from the study:
Drilling of Al alloy 6061 is effectively achieved sophonsifying surface finish
parameter.
Peak current influences the most- MRR followed by Pulse off-time, Pulse on-
time and Tool polarity.
4/11/17 14
Future Scope
4/11/17 15
Acknowledgment