No. of survey forms sent: 66 No.

of
70
64
60
50
50
44
40 40
40 36 Level 1
34
Level 2
% 30
30 26 Level 3
24 24
Level 4
20 18
16
14
12
10 8
6 6 6
2
0
PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4 PEO 5

No. of survey forms sent: 20 No. of r

60.0
50.0
50.0
41.7 41.7 41.7 41.7
40.0
33.3 33.3 33.3
30.0
% 25.0 25.0 25.0

20.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7

10.0 8.3

0.0
PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 0.0 0.0 PEO 4 PEO 5
1
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
 No. of survey forms sent: 65 No. of

60.0
52.3
50.0
40.9
38.6 38.6
40.0 36.4
31.8 31.8
29.5 29.5
30.0
% 22.7 22.7
20.5
20.0 18.2 15.9 15.9 15.9
13.6
9.1 9.1
10.0 6.8

0.0
PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4 PEO 5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

No. of survey forms sent: 19 No. of r

60.0 57.1 57.1
50.0
50.0

40.0 35.7 35.7 35.735.7

28.6 28.6 28.6
30.0
%
21.4 21.4
20.0
14.3 14.3

10.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1

0.0
PEO 1 0.0 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4 PEO 5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2

 Tool

Employer
Lab viva voce
Survey
Once
- Once
in ainweek.
a year
Projects Survey
Faculty last semester
Once in of athe
year
University
Exit Surveyexaminations
At the timeofonce
Graduation
in a semester
Internal Survey
Alumni assessments
Once
Thrice
in a year
in a semester
PO Achievement
Academic peer survey
Test - End
Onceofinthea year
programme
Assignments Once in a semester

3
Results of Evaluation of each PO

The Rubrics considered for assessment are

Batch 2008-2012

Engineering Problem
Knowledge: Analysis:
Graduate will Graduate will
demonstrate demonstrate an
knowledge of ability to
mathematics, identify,
science, and formulate, and
engineering. solve
engineering
problems.

4
Design/Development Conduct
of solutions: Investigations of
Graduate will complex
demonstrate the broad problems:
education necessary Graduate will
to understand the demonstrate the
impact of engineering ability to design
solutions in a global, and conduct
economic, experiments, as
environmental, and well as to analyze
societal context. and interpret data.

Modern Tool usuage: The Engineer and

Graduate will Society: Graduate
demonstrate an ability will demonstrate
to use the techniques, an understanding
skills, and modern of legal and
engineering tools cultural issues
necessary for with professional
engineering practice. responsibility

5
Environment and Ethics : Graduate
Sustainability: will demonstrate
Graduate will knowledge on
demonstrate ethical principles
knowledge for and norms of
issues in societal engineering
and environmental practices
contexts and
develop sustainable
solutions.

Individual and Communication:

Team Work: Graduate will
Graduate will demonstrate an
demonstrate an ability to
ability to function as communicate
an individual and on effectively.
multidisciplinary
teams.

6
Project Life-long
management learning:
and finance: Graduate will
Graduate will demonstrate
demonstrate the recognition of the
engineering and need for, and an
management ability to engage
principles to in life-long
manage projects. learning to meet
global challenges.

7
Placement and Higher studies
2008- 2006-
Description 2009-13 2007-11
12 10

Number of students 62 66 65 66

Number of students placed 35 55 51 52

Higher Studies 6 5 11 2

Placement Higher Studies

6052
5155 10
50 8
40 35 8
6 India
30 6 Abroad
Number of students 20 Number of students
10 4 33
22
0 2
0
2006-10
00 8
S.NO Company name Number of students Recruited
1 Aqua Pure Plus 9
2 C-Cubed solutions pvt ltd 10
3 HCL BPO Technologies 3
4 Srri Kandan Engineerings 13
Total Number of Placements 35

S.NO Company name Number of students Recruited

1 Amex alloys 2
2 L & T Info tech 2
3 Srri Kandan Engineerings 13
4 Vinayakaa Tex 7
5 Aqua Pure Plus 13
6 C-Cubed solutions pvt ltd 4
7 HCL BPO Technologies 4
8 Applied Automation systems pvt ltd 1
9 CSS corp 1
10 Smart training solutions 3
11 Sri Ragavendra Engineering 1
12 Topaz Multi-Industries 4 9
Total Number of Placements 55
S.NO Company name Number of students Recruited
1 Hofincons Ltd 1
2 L.G.Balakrishnan & Bros Limited 1
3 Lakshmi Gears 1
4 Sri Ladshmi Industries 1
5 Merit Industries Limited 4
6 Mphasis an HP Company 1
7 Omnex Quality Academy 6
8 Quest Informatics P ltd 1
9 South Indian Mettal Process 3
10 A.S.K.& Company 1
11 Autoprint Machinery Mfrs P Ltd 4
12 Avanashiappan Industries 1
13 CRI Pumps 6
14 Ford Technology Services India 5
15 Infosys BPO Limited 2
16 L&T Infotec h 5
17 Midas Safety Pvt Ltd 5
18 Infosys 2
19 Qubix Management Services 1
Total Number of Placements 51 10
 Professional Activities
Organization of paper contests, design contes

Acad No of No of
S. Activity Sl.No Academic Year Event Organized
emic Beneficiari Beneficiaries
No Organized 1 Design Contest 40
Year es
Seminar -02 230 2 RC Car 20
3 Water rocketry 25
2012 Workshop -02 105 2012-2013
4 Gaming 25
1 Guest Lecture -
640 5 Mr. Mechanic 20
2013 06
Total Events : 6 Paper contest 45
975
10 7 Design Contest 50
Seminar - 04 540 8 Quiz 50

2011 Workshop 03 186 9 Gaming 75

2011 2012
2 Guest Lecture - 10 Water rocketry 30
960
2012 07 11 Formula 1 20
Total Events :
1686 12 Paper contest 32
14
13 Design Contest 40
Seminar - 01 230
14 Quiz 60
2010 Workshop 0 0
15 Gaming 65
3 Guest Lecture 2010 2011
960 16 Water rocketry 25
2011 07
Total Events : 17 Formula 1 20
1190
08 18 Paper contest 40
11
Entrepreneurship initiatives, Product Designs and Innovations

No.of students
S.No Academic Year Topic Name of the Resource Person
benefited

Mr.Vimal Jose
ENTREPRENEU Founder & CEO
1 107
RSHIP Armor 24x7 Techno Solutions
India(p)Ltd

Mr.Rajaramanathan, Manager,
2012-13
QA & costing, Sri Ram Karthick
Polmers, Coimbatore.
2 E-Talk & 64
Mr.T.Selvan, Director,
Classic Visible Technologies,
Coimbatore

Mr.Ebin Elais, Asst Manager-

Entrepreneurial
3 Credit 61
Project Proposals
South Indian Bank

ENTREPRENEU
2011 - 2012 Mr.Amit Grover
4 RSHIP and
IIT BOMBAY and Nurture Talent 72
business plan-
Academy
Eureka 2011

5 E-Week Events Conducted 240

12
 Continuous Im
Improvement in Success Index
of Students

1 0.94
0.87
SI 0.81
0.8
0.6
0.4
2007-11 2008-12 2009-13
Improvement in Academic Performance
Index of Students
0.81
0.8 0.8
0.8
0.79 0.79
0.79 API
0.79 13
2007-11 2008-12 2009-13
 Continuous Im
Improvement in Student-
Teacher Ratio
0.74
0.73 0.73
*
0.73
0.73
STR
0.72
0.72
0.72
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Enhancement of Faculty
Qualification Index
0.81
0.82
0.81
0.8
0.78
0.76 0.74
0.74
FQI
0.72
0.7
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 14
 Continuous Im
Improvement in Faculty Research
Publications, R&D Work and Consultancy Work
1.2
1
1 *
0.89
0.8
FRP
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

0.6 0.54
0.5
0.4 0.36
0.3
0.2
FQI
0.04
0.1
0
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 15
 Continuous Im

Continuing Education

16
 Continuous Improvement

Department Contribution
44
4

3.5
33 3 3
3

2.5
2010-11
2 2 2
2 2011-12
2012-13
1.5 2013-14
1111 1 1 11
1

0.5

0 17
0
National Conference & Symposium Organized MoU Signed 0 0
 Continuous Improvement

Faculty Contribution

35 31 31 31
30
24
25 21
19 2010-
20 16 11
15 2011-
10 10
12
10
5 3 2 3 3
1
0
0 0

18
 Continuous Improvement

Students Contribution

93.93 97.00
100
86.15 83.33
90 77.27
80 74.00
70
55.56 56.00
60 48.00
50 38.00
40 28.00 28.00
30 24.00
19.00
20 10.00
10.00
6.00
10 1.37
0

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

19
100% Graduation and 100% placement.

20