Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(Case 1)
Kromuel P. Alcantara
2 2
For Case1 :
1 2
1. H O : 1 2 That the mean of population
1 is equal to the mean of
population 2.
The alternative hypothesis may be defined in
one of the three hypotheses same as of the t-test
for dependent samples presented below:
4. Decision Criterion:
Note that the decision criterion would
entirely depend on the formulated
alternative hypothesis. A s such, use the
following decision that correspondents to
the following decision criterion that
corresponds to the alternative hypothesis.
Note that the decision criterion would entirely
depend on the formulated alternative hypothesis. A
s such, use the following decision that
correspondents to the following decision criterion
that corresponds to the alternative hypothesis.
a. RejectH o tcif t a ( n1 n2 2 ) df
b. RejectH o tcif t a ( n1 n2 2 ) df
b. RejectH o tifc t a
( n1 n2 2 ) df
2
5. Computation
x1 x2
tc
1 1
s
2
p
n1 n2
where:
tc = computed t-value
s 2p = pooled variance
s 2
n1 1 s
2
1 n2 1 s 2
2
p
n1 n2 2
For equal sample sizes, this formula reduces
to
s s 2 2
s
2
p
1 2
2
Which is the simple average of the two
estimates. Otherwise, each of the estimates
receives weights proportional to its
respective degrees of freedom
6. State your decision based on the rejection
criterion and the computed test-statistic.
a. H o : 12 22
Ha :
2
1
2
2
3.08 2.38
3.10 2.68
2.35 2.17
3.86 3.56
3.91 3.73
2.65 1.48
1.72 1.85
2.30 1.86
2.80 2.76
3.50 2.68
Sample Size 10 10
Total 29.27 25.15
0.5291
Fc 1.059
0.4994
Fc F0.05(9.9 ) 3.18,
e. Decision: Since
accept the Ho
2
f. Conclusion:1 2
2
From the result of the comparison of the
variances of the fruit-bearing capabilities of
the two varieties of tomatoes, the following
is undertaken to solve the main problem:
tc 1.278
6. Decision:
Ho.
sufficient evidence to reject
7. Conclusion: The data indicate that the
fruit bearing capabilities of the two varieties
of tomatoes do not differ significantly at 5%
level.
Critical Values of t Distributi
on