GTS 10.

1 Upgrade:
Key
Sponsor/Stakeholder
Review Meeting
May 6, 2013

Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Project Review

Agenda:
Project Objectives / Team (John)
Plug-in status (John)
Hardware MTP on May 10th and11th (John)
Review down time and tasks
Review contingency plans
Review backlog management
GGT-new UAT preparation (David Barr)
Timeline
Scope of testing
Face to Face
High Level Timeline review for application upgrade (John)
Questions (All)

2 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Project Goals and Objectives
1. Upgrade Supply Chain IT GTS landscape from GTS version
7.2 to GTS 10.1
2. Upgrade Supply Chain IT GTS plug-ins as needed to ensure
continued connectivity to the newly upgraded GTS version
10.1 (ECC6.0 systems only)
3. Ensure all GTS interfacing systems continue to work with
the newly upgraded GTS version 10.1
4. Upgrade hardware for all boxes in the GTS landscape

3 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Sponsors/Key Stakeholders

Project Resource Project Role Org Direct Sponsor(s) Other/Executive Sponsors

John P. Larkin Project Manager PPS IT Linh Tanber

Bonnie Moore
Steve Morris Technical Lead PPS IT Pervinder Johar
David Clark Test Lead PPS IT
Bharadwaj Ogirala Interface Lead PPS IT Randy Gibson / Mark Huber
Kenny Gadok, Rajasekhar GTS SME PPS IT
Tatituri, Jonathan Michlik
Sheryl Fujihara Platform Lead ITOC David G Goldbach Shibu George
Vishal Varma BASIS Planner ITOC Vedanthu Rangachar & Ramana
Edulakanti
TBD Global IT Operations ITCS Kevin Holden Michel Brassart
Control (BRM)

Prabhu Periasamy, Geoffrey GTS SME GRC IT Dawn Drewry Curt Johnson
Blackwell
Jackie Scardello Global Trade Lead GT Mike Tada Heather Burroughs
Marek Jobda & Caryn Hughes Customs Ops Lead Custom Ops Dianna Cannon Bill Long

Jackie Scardello Product Compliance GT Richard Sicard Heather Burroughs

Gerlinde Fetscher & Venkatesh BRM Global IT Heath Dieckert Russell Jukes
Hampapur Operations

4 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
 Blue font= both install and testing is completed
Green font= both install and testing are pending

GTS Plug-in ECC6.0 Scope

Purple font= Install complete but testing is pendi

System Sandbox Developm Testing QA/Regress Production

(Basis ent ion
from
12pm
CST to
5pm CST)
D7F
Velocity D7A (1/9) D7B (2/5) D7D (2/18) D7C (3/9)
(Done)
Fusion AMS C99 (1/9) C30 (2/5) C50 (2/28) C10 (3/29) R00 (5/11)
Fusion EMEA R42 (1/10) U26 (2/6) S01 (2/28) R01 (3/9)
HP Shopping
SVS (1/9) svd (1/10) svq (2/6) svp
(HHO)
qa1 (4/15
Nt1 (3/6
HP Services 1 8:00 am to Pn1/pn2 (PX1:5/18
SB2 (1/17) Dvl (2/18) 8:00 am to
(AMS) 12:00 pm PX2:5/21)
noon PST)
PST)
q01(4/15
SB3 (1/11) nt2 (3/6
HP Services 2 tr2*(trainin 8:00 am to P01/p02 (PX1:5/18
(not the 8:00 am to
(EMEA) g) (2/11) 12:00 pm PX2:5/21)
first box) noon PST)
PST)
nt3 (3/7 qj1(4/16 8:00
HP Services 3 Pj1/pj2 (PX1:5/18
BS1 (1/11) 8:00 am to am to 12:00
5 (APJ)
Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. PX2:5/21)
noon PST) pm PST)
 GTS New Hardware Downtime Timeline
GGP new Hardware MTP: Activities During the Cut-Over

GGP Start: 5/10 8:00pm CST 11:25am CST3:00pm CST

Uptime Downtime ITOC to Uptime
clear
buffers/cach
3hrs e
Final
Final GGP-new
GGP-new DNS
Bring
Bring DNS switch
switch
Refresh
Refresh && set
set to
to IT
IT Biz
Biz Unloc
Unloc Buffe
Buffe
Fail
Fail over
over down
down Uptime
Initial
Initial GGP-
GGP- and
standby.
standby. Start
Start Push
Push GGP-new
GGP-new Repoint
Repoint TREX
TREX FO/FB
Vali
Vali Vali
Vali k
k rr for
for Uptime tasks
tasks
new and IT/Biz
IT/Biz GGP-old
GGP-old FO/FB dat Users unkn and Validations
new Refresh
Refresh validation
applying
applying logs
logs and
logs
logs read/
read/ write
write dat dat
dat Users unkn and Validations
validation from and lock
lock Basis
Basis &
& App
App post
post refresh
refresh e // Tidal owns
from current
current users Start Sync
e e
e Tidal owns
GGP users Start Sync
GGP SAP Unix
SAP Unix
5d 4d 6.25d 45m 20m 4hrs 4:20hrs 4hrs 1hr 1hr 30 min 3 hrs

18:55hrs Go/No
Go
Decisio
n

6 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
GGP Hardware MTP Contingency Plan
GTS 7.2 Path to Production for hardware MTP

GGD GGT - Old GGQ GGP- Old

(DEV) (Test) (QA) (PROD)

GGP - New
Contingency:
(PROD)
GGP will be brought down at the beginning of
hardware cutover (see cutover plans for
details)
DNS will switch pointer to new hardware
Go-no-Go decision will be made
If Decision is no-go, then switch DNS
back to old GGP hardware and allow
users back on. No data loss. Only
impact would be the down time and
failure to complete the upgrade.
If Decision is to go, then users will be
allowed on new hardware and
processing will proceed.
7 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Summary: If we fail on the cutover, then our
contingency is to simply bring up the old server
Cut-Over Document Backlog clearance
plan
System Resource to
monitor
Velocity Julie Blackburn
Fusion AMS Naveen Rajora
Fusion EMEA Hema , Support : Raj
Fusion APJ Bharad
Jonathan /Hema ; help from
IGSO PN1, PJ1, P01 Umakanth Potula
IJ1 Raj

Plan
1) Type of backlog (Orders, Delivery & Invoices(includes level B invoices from Eiffel))
2) Take a snapshot of above system during down time of the current backlog
Systems were chosen based upon historic weekend loads
3) Will publish the rough backlog numbers on these systems roughly every one
hour post upgrade
Will continue until backlog is at a normal amount. (expected to be cleared out within a few hours)
4) All remaining interface to GTS will be validated to ensure data is flow as
8 expected.
Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Plans for the UAT workshop
Definition
UAT schedule: Objectives of the F2F UAT workshop:
May, 6 Jul, 26
th th
Hardware upgrade related:
Support post migration application business
UAT workshop schedule & location: process related validations for hardware upgrade
May, 13th to 24th. Austin, TX Identify and fix all hardware migration related
issues in the room with IT (= avoid or minimize
Biz resources attending F2F: impact on business processes)
4 resources from GC&C
Caryn, Marek, Caio, Dave Software upgrade related:
3 resources from Regional Customs Kick off UAT testing in same room with IT
Paul, Michael, Bruce Setup governance process and alignment
Global Trade resources between Biz and IT for the UAT testing
Jackie Ensure all critical flows & complex functionalities
(TOP PRIO) test cases are executed and major
application issues are identified and addressed
for resolution during the workshop.
Agree on necessary design changes due to
functionality incompatibilities between GTS v.
7.2 and v.10.1
9 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Ensure
The information contained smooth
herein is subject cooperation
to change without notice. and (streamlined)
process wise path forward for the entire duration
Dependent Project classification
1) Project with No dependency - 22 Projects
Project are already live
Got confirmation from most of the PMs that there is no impact
Projects are going live after September

2) Project with Testing requirements on GTS and no changes on GTS - 14 Projects

Project are testing only to ensure feeder system changes are working with GTS.
Got confirmation from most of the PMs that there is no impact

3) Project with changes on GTS and UAT completion by May 6thth - 9 Projects

Project with master data changes ( adding plants etc. )

Project with coding changes

4) Project with changes on GTS and UAT in progress beyond May 6th
th and Go-Live by August 17th
th - 16

Projects
Project with master data changes ( adding plants etc. ) 15 Projects
10
Project with coding changes 1 Project
Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Approach to test case selection
Scope:
Not testing all combinations of Plant, Shipping Point, Ship-From Country, Ship-To Country, Order
Type, Buy/Sell relationship
Selecting for:
Major representative flows
Specific order scenarios (CTO, KMAT, bundles)
GTS Functionalities
All up-streams systems, declaration creation, compliance, data accuracy, Import/Export,
master data, security and roles, Portal, messages, reference systems

Test Case sources for Customs and GT:

Current GTS test box activity, IT generated reports from the source test systems, BU inputs,
Regional Ops inputs, ad hoc source system reports, concurrent projects test cases (e.g. FAPJ
upgrade)

11 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Approach to test case generation
Options
Cancel and re-bill existing IC billing on test system
Benefits Customs testing but not Compliance testing
Cloning of existing test cases
Benefits both Customs and Compliance testing, reduces BU setup work
E2E order creation
Benefits both Customs and Compliance testing, requires BU setup work

Method selection:
If source system supports cancel/re-bill and scenario not to be tested by GT: utilize cancel/re-bill
Otherwise use a combination of Cloning and E2E

12 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Test case summary R/3 Fusion AMS
Clone 26
Discrete GT 1
Total 27
R/3 Fusion APJ FAPJ Upg 41
Total Number of cases: 318 CancReb 41
Declaration generating cases: 269 R/3 Fusion EMEA Clone 11
Combination of Cancel/Re-bill, Clone etc Total 52
CancReb* 8
Discrete cases: 49 R/3 iGSO AMS Clone 5
GT and Customs functionality Total 13
CancReb* 14
R/3 iGSO APJ Clone 3
Total 17
CancReb* 7
R/3 iGSO EMEA Clone 8
Total 15
Clone 12
R/3 IJ1 Discrete GT 1
Total 13
R/3 IPMO Clone 4
Clone 16
E2E 3
R/3 RSAP
Discrete GT 2
Total 21
R/3 SAIL CancReb 11
CancReb 36
Clone 9
R/3 Velocity
E2E 2
Total 48

13 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Next Steps
Continue aligning on testing with FUSION APJ upgrade and other project teams.
Continue building daily test plan and prioritize test cases for UAT workshop In progress
Upload test cases to ALM In progress
Prepare UAT documentation In progress
Provide training for testing team Week of 06May
Prepare GTS UAT workshop agenda Week of 06May
Kick off UAT May 9/10th

14 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
High Level Time Line

15 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Key Takeaways

GTS Plug-in project is on track and will be complete by the end of May 2013
GTS Hardware MTP is planned for May 10th starting at 8:00pm CST and will run for ~19
hours
There will be two paths to production for GTS starting May 10 th
GTS 7.2 Path to production
GTS 10.1 Path to production
GTS UAT planning/preparation is going very well and we are on track for the UAT face to
face starting the week of May 13th
Additional work to occur in parallel to UAT to get additional QA box on 10.1 (this is the
final dry run)

16 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Thank you

Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
Backup

Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
 IT Project Team (Upgrade )
Project Active Sponsors:
Bonnie Moore (SC IT)
[PPM ID: 229434]
Linh Tanber (SC IT)

Project Manager
John P. Larkin SAP Ramp Up Consultant:
Ricardo Calzadilla
Project Technical lead: Steve Morris (ricardo.calzadilla@sap.com; 954-295-3493)
GTS SMEs: Bharadwaj Ogirala, Rajasekhar Tatituri, Kenny Gadok, Jonathan Michlik, Muhammed
Chowdhury / Geoffery Blackwell, Prabhu Periasamy / Julie Blackburn SAP GTS Functional Consultant:
Ricardo Calzadilla as needed
Tidal lead: Klaus Maier
SAP GTS Plug-in Consultant:
GTS Development lead: Sam Cottam Ricardo Calzadilla as needed

HP Regression Test lead: Radhey Sharma B2B & A2A: Luis Perez, Lizeth Heredia
HP Test Management: David Clark with Julie Blackburn
APO/BW: Brian Dollard, Omar Reyes
Technical/ABAP development: Angie Lee

Basis Planner lead: Vishal Sharma (ITOC: David McConnell,Manoj Somani) Support
Venkatesh Hampapur
Hardware lead: Sam Cottam, Jim Reinhardt Gerlinde Fetscher

Platform lead: Sheryl Fujihara

WiPro
Lead: Amit Jain
GTS Functional: Naveen Rajora
GTS Technical: Hema Vennapusala
GTS Test lead: Srini Ponnakanti (consulting with Raja Sundaresan)
GTS Technical Support: Sree Padmanabhuni

Unix: Catherine Duong, Julie Blackburn (BCS: Muhammad Kamal Zawari, Henry Zhou)
19 DBA: Sagar
Copyright Patel, Eric Carr
2012 Hewlett-Packard (Ganesan
Development Muniandy,Shailender
Company, L.P. The informationReddy)
contained herein is subject to change without notice.

SAP Security: Mays, Jack

 Monitoring Systems
System Resource Email Contact
RSAP Bharad / Naveen bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com / rajora.naveen@hp.c
SAIL Bharad om
bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com
IPMO (APJ) Bharad bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com
rajasekhar.tatituri@hp.com
PRMO Raj, Naveen / rajora.neveen@hp.com
bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com /
Vista Bharad / Jonathan jonathan.michlik@hp.com
Newton Jonathan jonthan.michlik@hp.com
CRMS Jonathan jonthan.michlik@hp.com
XI Ed Dunkley edwin.dunklee@hp.com
HPSB Luis Perez luis-bernardino.perez@hp.com
BW Bharad bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com
AES and CUSDEC rajasekhar.tatituri@hp.com
outbound Raj
Portal bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com
Bharad
MBX file hema.vennapusala@hp.com
Hema / Raj/Naveen
rajasekhar.tatituri@hp.com /
SXI_MONITOR Raj /Ed Dunklee Edwin.dunklee@hp.com
1) Will monitor
AES inbound idocs rest
Bharad of the systems in terms of data
flow
bharadwaj.ogirala@hp.com
2) Trying to get support from the non-sap feeder systems contact to
get support during cut over.
20 Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.