Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chapter 5
5
Competitive Dynamics
Michael
Michael A.
A. Hitt
Hitt
R.
R. Duane
Duane Ireland
Ireland
Robert
Robert E.
E. Hoskisson
Hoskisson
Strategic
Competitiveness
Feedback Above Average
Returns
Ch5
Factors Leading to More Complex Rivalry
Ch5
Competitive Dynamics
Results from a series of competitive actions and
competitive responses among firms competing within
a particular industry
Competitive Rivalry
Exists when two or more firms jockey with one another
in the pursuit of better market position
Ch5
A firm’s
strategic conduct
is dynamic in
nature
Competitive
Actions taken
responses lead
by one firm Competitive to additional
elicit responses
from Dynamics actions from the
firm that acted
competitors
originally
Actions and
responses shape the
competitive positions
of each firm’s
business level
strategy
Ch5
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive Outcomes
Ability for
Behavior Interfirm Rivalry: Action and Competitive
Awareness Attack & Response Market Types
Response
Motivation Slow, Standard
Capability Likelihood of Attack Relative Size or Fast Cycle
First Mover Incentives Speed Competitive
Likelihood of Response Innovation Outcomes
Type of Competitive Quality Sustained
Competitive
Competitor Action Advantage
Actor’s Reputation
Analysis Temporary
Dependence on the Advantage
Market Market
Commonality Resource Availability Evolutionary
Resource Outcomes
Similarity Entrepreneurial
Growth-Oriented
Feedback or Market-Power
Action Ch5
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive
Behavior
Do managers understand
Awareness the key characteristics of
Motivation competitors?
Capability
Ch5
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive
Behavior
Awareness
Does the firm have
Motivation appropriate incentives to
Capability attack or respond?
Ch5
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive
Behavior
Awareness
Motivation
Does the firm have the
Capability necessary resources to
attack or respond?
Ch5
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive Outcomes
Ability for
Behavior Interfirm Rivalry: Action and Competitive
Awareness Attack & Response Market Types
Response
Motivation Slow, Standard
Capability Likelihood of Attack Relative Size or Fast Cycle
First Mover Incentives Speed Competitive
Likelihood of Response Innovation Outcomes
Type of Competitive Quality Sustained
Competitive
Competitor Action Advantage
Actor’s Reputation
Analysis Temporary
Dependence on the Advantage
Market Market
Commonality Resource Availability Evolutionary
Resource Outcomes
Similarity Entrepreneurial
Growth-Oriented
Feedback or Market-Power
Action Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Competitor
Analysis
Market Do firms compete with each
Commonality other in multiple markets?
Resource
Similarity
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Competitor
Analysis
Market Multipoint competition tends to
reduce competitive interactions, but
Commonality
increases the likelihood of response
where interaction occurs
Resource
Similarity For example, airlines price flights
similarly but respond quickly when
competitors introduce promotional
prices
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Competitor
Analysis
Market
Commonality
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Competitor
Analysis
Market
Firms are less inclined to attack a
Commonality firm that is likely to retaliate
Resource Firms with similar resources are
Similarity more likely to be aware of each
other’s competitive moves
Actor’s Reputation
Market leaders are more likely to be copied
“Risk taking” firms are less likely to be copied
“Price Predators” are less likely to be copied
Ch5-
Gauging the Likelihood of Response
Market Dependence
Firms that are more dependent on a single industry are
more likely to respond than are diversified firms
Industry dependent firms will likely respond to
either strategic or tactical actions
Competitor Resources
Smaller firms are more likely to respond to tactical
actions
Limited resources may lead to alternatives such as
Strategic Alliances
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive Outcomes
Ability for
Behavior Interfirm Rivalry: Action and Competitive
Awareness Attack & Response Market Types
Response
Motivation Slow, Standard
Capability Likelihood of Attack Relative Size or Fast Cycle
First Mover Incentives Speed Competitive
Likelihood of Response Innovation Outcomes
Type of Competitive Quality Sustained
Competitive
Competitor Action Advantage
Actor’s Reputation
Analysis Temporary
Dependence on the Advantage
Market Market
Commonality Resource Availability Evolutionary
Resource Outcomes
Similarity Entrepreneurial
Growth-Oriented
Feedback or Market-Power
Action Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Ability for
Action and
Response
Firm size can have
Relative Size opposing effects on
competitive dynamics
Speed
Innovation
Quality
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Ability for
Large firms may exert market power
Action and over rivals and erect barriers to
Response entry against smaller competitors
Quality
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Ability for
Action and
Response
Relative Size
Speed Consistent innovation
is required for market
Innovation
leadership in many
dynamic industries
Quality
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Ability for
Action and
Response
Relative Size
Speed
Innovation Exceeding customer
expectations is a necessity
Quality to compete in the 21st
century
Ch5-
Quality Dimensions of Goods & Services
Product Quality Dimensions:
Performance Operating characteristics
Features Important special characteristics
Flexibility Meeting operating specifications over time
Durability Amount of use before performance
deteriorates
Conformance Match with pre-established standards
Serviceability Ease and speed of repair or normal service
Aesthetics How a product looks and feels
Perceived quality Subjective assessment of
characteristics (product image)
Ch5-
Quality Dimensions of Goods & Services
Service Quality Dimensions:
Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Drivers of
Competitive Outcomes
Ability for
Behavior Interfirm Rivalry: Action and Competitive
Awareness Attack & Response Market Types
Response
Motivation Slow, Standard
Capability Likelihood of Attack Relative Size or Fast Cycle
First Mover Incentives Speed Competitive
Likelihood of Response Innovation Outcomes
Type of Competitive Quality Sustained
Competitive
Competitor Action Advantage
Actor’s Reputation
Analysis Temporary
Dependence on the Advantage
Market Market
Commonality Resource Availability Evolutionary
Resource Outcomes
Similarity Entrepreneurial
Growth-Oriented
Feedback or Market-Power
Action Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Outcomes
Competitive Market Types Slow cycle markets are
Slow, Standard or Fast Cycle frequently shielded by
monopoly power or very
Competitive Outcomes strong brand loyalties
Sustained Competitive
Advantage This market outcome and
Temporary Advantage lack of interfirm rivalry
may lead to sustained
Evolutionary Outcomes
competitive advantage
Evolutionary Actions
Growth-Oriented Actions
Market-Power Actions Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Outcomes
Standard cycle markets
Competitive Market Types often lead to highly
Slow, Standard or Fast Cycle competitive pressures
Competitive Outcomes despite world class
products
Sustained Competitive
Advantage Firms with multimarket
Temporary Advantage competition may dampen
Evolutionary Outcomes rivalry somewhat
Evolutionary Actions Sustained competitive
Growth-Oriented Actions advantage is a possible
Market-Power Actions outcome in this instance Ch5-
Model of Interfirm Rivalry:
Likelihood of Attack and Response
Outcomes
Fast cycle markets are
Competitive Market Types
intensely dynamic and a
Slow, Standard or Fast Cycle first mover advantage is
Competitive Outcomes often unsustainable
Sustained Competitive Firms may cannibalize
Advantage older generation products
Temporary Advantage while introducing new
Evolutionary Outcomes innovative premium
products
Evolutionary Actions
Growth-Oriented Actions Sustainable competitive
Market-Power Actions advantage is unilkely Ch5-
Gradual Erosion of a
Sustained Competitive Advantage
Returns
from a
Sustained
Competitive
Advantage Exploitation
Counterattack
Launch
Time (years)
10 Ch5-
Some Firms Maintain Competitive Advantage
in Fast-Cycle Markets by Seizing the Initiative
Returns
from a
Sustained
Competitive
Advantage
Exploitation Counterattack
Launch
Returns
from a
Sustained
Competitive Firm has already moved
Advantage on to Advantage No. 2
Exploitation Counterattack
Launch
Returns
from a
Sustained
Competitive Firm continues to move
Advantage on to the next Advantage
Exploitation Counterattack
Launch
Growth-Oriented
Actions
Entrepreneurial
Actions