PHILOSOPHY

WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?

IT IS A SISTEM OF IDEAS ABOUT SEVERAL

IMPORTANT TOPICS TO THE HUMAN BEING
 PHILOSOPHY

FIELDS

METAPHYSICS EPISTEMOLOGY ETHICS POLITICS AESTHETICS

RIGHTS AND
REALITY KNOWELEDGE MODAL VALUES NATURE OF ART
GOVERNMENTS
 TOP 10 GREAT QUESTIONS OF PHILOSOPHY
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE? THE UNIVERSE

IS THERE A SUPREME BEING? GOD?

WHAT IS THE PLACE OF MAN IN THE UNIVERSE? FUNCTION OF MAN IN THE UNIVERSE

WHAT IS REALITY? REALITY

WHAT DETERMINES THE FATE OF EACH INDIVIDUAL? LIVE IS WRITTEN? GOD? LUCKY?

WHAT IS GOOD AND WHAT IS BAD OR EVIL? ETHICS

WHY ARE THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE? REALITY VS UTOPIA

WHAT IS THE IDEAL RELATION BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL AND
POLITIES
THE STATE
WHAT IS EDUCATION? EDUCATION VS FUTURE

WHAT HAPPENS AT DEATH? METHAPHISIC

 ETHICS

WAY PEOPLE ACT

VALUES CUSTOMS

CONCEPTS

RIGHT WRONG

AREAS

APLIED ETHICS OR
META ETHICS NORMATIVE ETHICS
DESCRIPTICE ETHICS

HOW TO DETERMINE
CONCEPTS USE OF VALUES
VALUES
 GUILT AND
MORALITY
ETHICS
SOME PEOPLE ACEPT
ETHICAL NORMS
IT IS THE MORAL
BECAUSE OF THE
STANDART
FEAR OF GETTING
CAUGHT

GUILT IS THE
MOTIVATOR OF
HONEST PEOPLE (IT IS
AN HABIT)
THE AREAS OF ETHICS

IT IS HOW PEOPLE DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES WHAT NORMS TO FOLLOW

META - ETHICS PEOPLE ARE BEING INFLUENCED BY: TEACHERS, RELIGION, PEERS, CULTURE AND
MEDIA

ESTABLISH APPROPIATE BEHAVIOURS PEOPLE SHOULD PERFORM

NORMATIVE ETHICS THE GOOD LANGUAGE IN ETHICS IS CALLED VERACITY

APLIED ETHICS IT IS HOW PEOPLE BEHAVE.

PEOPLE DO A N INTROSPECTION IN ORDER TO RATIONALIZING THEIR PAST
OR DESCRIPTICE HIPOCRISY
ETHICS MORAL SELF REFLECTION IN ORDER TO IMPROVE OUR BEHAVIOUR
NEED DO WE NEED A NEW
THIS IS A RESULT OF THE NEW DISCOVERIES
THAT PROVIDE US NEW EXPLANATIONS, FOR
EXAMPLE : BIOLOGICAL BASIS, INDEPENDENT OF

FOR ETHICS? HUMAN DECISION.

GLOBAL CHRISTIAN ETHICS VS NEW DISCOVERIES

ETHICS
EACH RELIGION AND SOCIETY HAS TRIED TO
ETHICAL BRING AN EXPLANATION OF HOW TO LIVE

REVOLUTION NON DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES IMPOSE

DOMINION OF IDEOLOGIES THROUGH POLITICAL
PROCESS OF CONTROL OF LIFE
FROM THE XVIIth CENTURY HAVE DONE A
DEMOCRATIAZTION REVOLUTION. NOW, DIFFERENT RELIGIONS,
CULTURE, AND IDEOLOGIES LIVE IN DEMOCRACY

AND GLOBALIZATION IN 1948, DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE

MADE.
 UNIVERSAL
DECLARATION OF
GLOBAL ETHICS PROPOSED FOR THE FIRST TIME BY ROMAN CATHOLICS

PREAMBLE
ALL WOMEN AND MEN SUPPORT UNIVERSAL RIGHTS

BASIC RULE UNIVERSALITY, HUMANISTLY, HUMAN WILL

WHAT YOU DO NOT WANT DONE TO YOURSELF, DO NOT DO TO OTHERS

FREEDOM WHITHOUT LICERTIOUSNESS

BASIC PRINCIPLES RESPECT TO EACH OTHERS
HOLD THEIR OWN BELIEF

LEGAL RESPONSABILITIES
RESPONSABILITIES CONCERNING CONSCIENCE
MIDDLE PRINCIPLES RESPONSABILITIES CONCERNING SPEECH AND INFORMATION
RESPONSABILITIES CONCERNING PARTICIPATION IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS AND SELF
GOVERNANCE
ANOTHER
 DESCRIPTION OF ETHICAL THEORIES AND PRINCIPLES
FOUNDATION OF ETHICAL ANALYSIS
VIEWPOINT FROM WHICH GUIDANCE CAN BE OBTEINED ALONG THE PATHWAY TO A DECISION

BENEFICIENCE LEAST HARM RESPECT TO JUSTICE

TO DO WHAT IS GOOD NO BENEFICAL AUTONOMY ETHICAL DECISION
TO WHOLE DILEMMA CHOISES PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO MUST BE ACCORDING
CORRESPOND AN LEAST HARM MAKE DECISIN TO TO ETHICAL THEORY
ACCEPTABLE POSSIBLE APPLY TO THEIR LIVES AN ETHICAL DECISIN
SOLUTION TO HARM TO THE PEOPLE SHOULD MUST BE SUPPORTED
GOOD OVER BAD FEWER PEOPLE HAVE CONTROL OVER BY A CONSISTENT
THEIR LIVES AS MUCH LOGICAL BASIS
AS POSSIBLE
 DEONTOLOGY UTILITARIANISM RIGHTS CASUIST VIRTUE
PEOPLE MUST DO THEIR IS FOUNDED ON THE RIGHTS ARE IT COMPARES A IT JUDGES A PERSON BY
OBLIGATIONS BECAUSE ABILITY TO PREDICT THE CONSIDERED TO BE CURRENT ETHICAL HIS CHARACTER RATHER
IT IS THEIR DUTIES AND CONSEQUENCES OF AN ETHICALLY CORRECT DILEMMA WITH THAN BY AN ACTION
IT IS ETHICALLY ACTION AND VALID EXAMPLES OF SIMILAR THAT MAY DEVIATE
CORRECT ETHICAL DILEMMAS FROM HIS NORMAL
ACT UTILITARIANISM: A AND THEIR OUTCOMES BEHAVIOR
INDIVIDUALS MAY
DEONTOLOGY PROVIDES PERSON PERFORMS THE IN ORDER TO IT TAKES THE PERSON'S
BESTOW RIGHTS UPON
A BASIS FOR SPECIAL ACTS THAT BENEFIT THE DETERMINE THE MORALS, REPUTATION
OTHERS IF THEY HAVE
DUTIES AND MOST PEOPLE SEVERITY OF THE AND MOTIVATION INTO
THE ABILITY AND
OBLIGATIONS TO SITUATION AND CREATE ACCOUNT WHEN
RESOURCES TO DO SO
PEOPLE THE BEST POSSIBLE RATING AN UNUSUAL
RULE UTILITARIANISM: SOLUTION ACCORDING
TAKES INTO ACCOUNT AND IRREGULAR
THE SOCIETY HAS TO TO OTHERS' BEHAVIOR THAT IS
THERE IS NO RATIONALE THE LAW AND IS DETERMINE WHAT EXPERIENCES.
OR LOGICAL BASIS FOR CONCERNED WITH CONSIDERED
RIGHTS IT WANTS TO UNETHICAL
DECIDING AN FAIRNESS UPHOLD AND GIVE TO
INDIVIDUAL'S DUTIES ITS CITIZENS