Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A rc h i t H a l di a
OF FLY ASH BRICKS 1 10 9 0 43 34
M N I T, J a i p u r
MADE BY DIFFERENT
GUIDELINES WITH
UTILIZATION OF WASTE
AGGREGATES Under the
s u p e r v ision o f :
D r. Sa n de e p
Choudhary
D r. Sa n de e p
S h ri va st ava
M s . Sum a ra j
OVERVIEW
Introduction
Objective
Review of Literature
Motivation
Methodology and Experimental Setup
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
References
INTRODUCTION
Bricks have been mainly produced from clay and shale since
decades. The continuous extraction of clay and the removal of
the topsoil for brick manufacturing cause substantial
depletion of natural resources.
It is estimated that nearly 8 -10% of the total production of
fired clay bricks is discarded and thus there is a need to use
this waste resourcefully. The production of these bricks not
only consumes natural resources but are also a significant
source of air pollution.
Indian Construction Industry generates nearly 10-12 million
tonnes of waste annually [IL&FS ].
Owing to all these shortcomings we need an alternate and
eco-friendly method of producing bricks.
INTRODUCTION
1. 2.36 0 0 100 0
mm
2. 1.18 3 0.6 99.4 0.6 EDS shows that fly ash used
in this case is Class C fly
mm
ash with a min 50% SiO2
3. 600 m 3 0.6 98.8 1.2
plus Al2O3 plus Fe2O3.
Sieve analysis concludes IS
code specification for
4. 300 m 20.5 4.1 94.7 5.3
particles retained on 45
micron IS sieve - minimum
34%.
5. 150 m 38 7.6 87.1 12.9
Pan 43.3 - -
STONE DUST
All plants use locally available sand/ stone dust. The sand
used for the experimental works is locally procured and
conformed to grading zone 3 (IS 383 ). In the present study
stone dust was procured from The Arawali Ranges at Ghat ki
Guni mining area.
Zone of Grading : 3 Sl. No. Sieve No. Weight Percentage Percentage Cumulative
Pan 78 7.8 - -
SLUDGE LIME
The waste bricks used in this study was taken from the brick
kilns where bricks are broken during handling, drying and
transportation.
To turn these bricks into aggregates, these bricks were broken
down using a jaw crusher as shown in figure .
After passing through jaw crusher then the material was
passed through a roll crusher as shown in figure.
S.No. Sieve Weight Percentage Percentage Cumulative
mm
mm
Waste Brick
Aggregates Fly Ash Sand
Designation (%) (%) (%) Lime
NTPC 0 60 30 10
BA10S20 10 60 20 10
BA20S10 20 60 10 10
BA30S0 30 60 0 10
COMM 0 25 65 10
BA65FA25 65 25 0 10
METHODOLOGY
Compressive Strength
Water Absorption Test
Ef florescence Test
Warpage Test
Shape and Size Test
Hardness Test
Soundness Test
FESEM and EDS test
XRD test
FESEM AND EDS TEST
(in N/mm2)
NTPC
4.48
BA10S20
3.87
BA20S10
2.74
BA30S0
2.24
COMM
13.08
BA65FA25
3.2
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
NTPC
17.59
BA10S20
19.75
BA20S10
21.57
BA30S0
21.75
COMM
11.22
BA65FA25
17.23
WATER ABSORPTION TEST
NTPC
Nil
BA10S20
Nil
BA20S10
Nil
BA30S0
Slight
COMM
Nil
BA65FA25
Slight
EXPERIMENTS