0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
65 Ansichten12 Seiten
The document discusses construction safety at a site. It outlines the key elements of a successful safety program, including defining performance expectations, establishing roles and responsibilities, identifying hazards, implementing work controls, and providing oversight and enforcement. Current construction projects at the site are also listed. The document then provides more details on the construction safety plan, contractor selection criteria, safety training programs, hazards identification and work planning processes, and field oversight measures. [/SUMMARY]
The document discusses construction safety at a site. It outlines the key elements of a successful safety program, including defining performance expectations, establishing roles and responsibilities, identifying hazards, implementing work controls, and providing oversight and enforcement. Current construction projects at the site are also listed. The document then provides more details on the construction safety plan, contractor selection criteria, safety training programs, hazards identification and work planning processes, and field oversight measures. [/SUMMARY]
The document discusses construction safety at a site. It outlines the key elements of a successful safety program, including defining performance expectations, establishing roles and responsibilities, identifying hazards, implementing work controls, and providing oversight and enforcement. Current construction projects at the site are also listed. The document then provides more details on the construction safety plan, contractor selection criteria, safety training programs, hazards identification and work planning processes, and field oversight measures. [/SUMMARY]
1 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Successful Safety Program
Define Expectations of Performance
Establish Roles and Responsibilities Identify Uncontrolled Hazards Effective Work Controls Oversight and Monitoring Enforcement
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
2 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Work in Progress
XL Construction Sector 20 demolition Magnet Measurement Facility FFTB Harris Construction Sector 24 Staircase
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
3 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu 24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop 4 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu 24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop 5 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Construction Safety
Project Environment, Safety & Health Plan
Contractor Selection Criteria Safety Training Hazards Identification and Work Planning Field Oversight
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
6 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu LCLS Safety Plan
Modeled after SNS
ISMS Criteria DOE Order 440.1A Worker Protection Management ANSI A10.33 Safety and Health Program Requirements for Multi- Employer Projects
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
7 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Contractor Selection Criteria
EMR Rate equal/less than 0.81
Corporate Safety Plan Interview Key Personnel Job Hazards Analysis & Safety Training References from previous clients Site visits
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
8 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Safety Training
LCLS Contractor Safety Orientation
Outline provided to SLAC ES&H Division Examples of other project orientations Power Point Show (Contractor Supplement) Conventional Facilities Group Meetings Meetings with Contractor Mgt & Safety Staff LCLS Staff Safety Orientation (in development)
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
9 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Things are the way they are because either: Management wanted them to be that way. Management tolerates them being that way. Management did not know that things are the way they are. Management doesnt know any better.
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
10 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Field Oversight
Contractor Field Safety Personnel
Conventional Facilities PM/UTR SLAC ES&H Division Oversight SLAC Building and Area Managers Scheduled Senior Management Walks Stanford Site Office Oversight
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
11 FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu Conclusion
Supportive LCLS Conventional Facilities Staff
Effective work planning and execution Responsive subcontractors Job Safety & Area Hazards Analysis improving Turners staff is enthusiastic