Sie sind auf Seite 1von 50

2016 - 2017 State Assessment Results

(Preliminary)

July 27, 2017


Delaware system of student assessments
measures student growth across grades
State-, District- and Charter-level Results from 2017
Delaware System of Student Assessments (DeSSA)
Assessment Subject(s) Grade(s)
English Language Arts
Smarter 3 to 8
(ELA) & Math
Evidence-Based Reading
SAT High School
Writing (ERW) & Math
ELA & Math
3 to 8
DCAS-Alt1
(Science & Social Studies in and 11
applicable grades)

DCAS Science 5, 8, 10

2
Smarter participation rates continue to
be high

Statewide Smarter Participation

ELA Math
Participation Rate
2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017
Statewide 97 98 99 96 98 99

Delaware saw a growth in participation rate

All grades in both Smarter ELA and Math met or


exceeded the 95% participation threshold for federal
reporting

3
More students tested and more
students
are proficient in Smarter
Statewide Smarter Math Results 3-8
+ 3,508 more students CCR since
2015 + 2,198 + 1,310
41% 44% 45%
60,000

n = 61,832
n = 60,537
50,000
24,26 26,46 27,77
n = 59,604

4 2 2
40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0
2015 2016 2017

Not Proficient Proficient

4
2017 Smarter Math Achievement Levels

Smarter Math, Achievement Levels, 2015 to 2017


Proficient: 41%

2015 29 31 24 17

Proficient: 44%

2016 27 30 24 20

Proficient: 45%

2017 27 29 24 21

0 20 40 60 80 100

Achievement Level 4 Achievement Level 3 Achievement Level 2 Achievement Level 1

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number and may not equal 100.

5
Smarter Math: Delaware students continue
to make gains from 2015 baseline
2015 Statewide Overall Proficiency: 41%
2016 Statewide Overall Proficiency: 44% 2017
Statewide Overall Proficiency: 45%

Smarter Math, 2015 to 2017


100

80
+0 +3 +6 +7 +4 +3
60

40
53 55 53 51 50
47 44
20 38 41 34 37 41 37 40 41 35 38 38

0
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2015 2016 2017

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

6
Smarter Math: Delaware students continue
to make gains from 2015 baseline
2015 Statewide Overall Proficiency: 41%
2016 Statewide Overall Proficiency: 44% 2017
Statewide Overall Proficiency: 45%

Smarter Math, 2015 to 2017


100

80

60
+0 +3 +6 +7 +4 +3

40
53 55 53 51 50
47 44
20 38 41
34 37 41 37 40 41 35 38 38

0
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

7
Smarter Math: Nearly all districts saw
gains in proficiency from 2015 to 2017
District Math Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017

100

+7 +7
+7 +7
75 +17 +13 +8 +8
2017
State Math
Percent
Proficient:
50 45%

57 56
25 49 50 53 51 54 48 49
44 46 47
39 41 39 41 43 41 41
38
30 31
28
21

0
Laurel Seaford Woodbridge Delmar Indian River Lake Forest Milford Appoquinimink
2015 2016 2017
NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

8
Smarter Math: Nearly all districts saw
gains in proficiency from 2015 to 2017
District Math Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100

75
+6 +5
+3 +3
+5 +3 +0 -2 2017
50
State Math
Percent
Proficient:
45%
57 58 61
57 56
25 51 48
45 46 43 45 46
36 37 38 38 38
32 30 31 33 32 32 30

0
ey l l
en ita na n a
in
e
Cl
ay ia
dn o p p yr ir st w o n
o nl Ca Sm y
Re
d ol
rR H e Ch a nd C
sa pe Br
C ae a
C
2015 2016 2017
NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

9
Smarter Math: Charters results varied
from 2015 to 2017
Charter Math Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100 +17 +3

75
+24 +9
+6
50 +5 +2 2017
84 State Math
Percent
Proficient:
54 50 55 52 45%
25
43 41 +6* 37
47 43 43
34
26 29 27
23
17
11
0 N/A
0 0
r 74 81
y 91 es k ks i n r 87
41 88 y
ve m ee or to te em
o de Oa s ar
Not tested
m r s a d
of
D a tco C t te d C h a
Ac Ou nc
e
rea on un k Ac
my
se
x e ** e G M yF
o ar ra
de tv ** id e il w pi
a Su
s
si rov tat m Ne As
Ac Po P st
S Fa
Fir

*Comparison between 2016-17 data. 2015 2016 2017


** Less than 5 percent.

NOTES: Charters differ in grade configuraton. Not all schools serve all grades 3-8. Some charters did not test or were not in existence for both testng years shown.
Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

10
Smarter Math: Charters results varied
from 2015 to 2017
Charter Math Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100

-1
75
-3

50 +1 -14
+1 2017
71 76 70 69 70 67 State Math
Percent
25
37 40 38 -4* 40 -9
Proficient:
45%
+1 25 27 -7 28 26
21 24 22 23 23
18
13 14
7
0
5 5 6 r l 5
n b o OT y e ba

Not tested
Not tested
Not tested

is o
m La ns r te oo m id
Ed C om ay Al
o M ha ch d e
st
S u m
s w yC rS ca Ea Ku
a us te e rte A
om m
p Ga ys
s a tg
e
Th C a Academi d Ch es
a Alonso O
eir
e Pr
F r

*Comparison between 2016-17 data. 2015 2016 2017

NOTES: Charters differ in grade configuraton. Not all schools serve all grades 3-8. Some charters did not test or were not in existence for both testng years shown.

11
Smarter Math: Priority school results
varied from 2015 to 2017
Smarter Math, Percent Proficient, 2015 to 2017
100

75

+24
50

2017
State Math
+6 +2 Percent
25 +2 Proficient:
38 +0 -4 45%

27
18 22 20
14 11 12 11 11 13 10
3 3 3 7 3
0
6

Middle
(Laurel) Grades 3-5 Grades 3-5 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 3-5
Grades 5-8

2015 2016 2017

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

12
Math results across subgroups highlight
continued commitment to prepare all students
for CCR
Change in Percent Proficient in Math from 2015 to 2017

Increased Proficiency Maintained Proficiency Decreased Proficiency

13
More students tested and more
students
are proficient in Smarter
Statewide Smarter ELA Results 3-8
+ 2,594 more students CCR since 2015
+ 2,309 + 285
52% 55% 54%
60,000

n = 61,593
50,000

n = 60,251
30,709 33,018 33,303
n = 59,197

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0
2015 2016 2017

Not Proficient Proficient

14
2017 Smarter ELA Achievement Levels

Smarter ELA, Achievement Levels, 2015 to 2017

Proficient: 52%

2015 24 25 31 21

Proficient: 55%

2016 22 24 32 23

Proficient: 54%

2017 22 24 32 22

0 20 40 60 80 100

Achievement Level 4 Achievement Level 3 Achievement Level 2 Achievement Level 1

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number and may not equal 100.

15
Smarter ELA: Delaware students continue to
make gains from 2015 baseline

2015 Overall Proficiency in ELA: 52%


2016 Overall Proficiency in ELA: 55%
2017 Overall Proficiency in ELA: 54%

Smarter ELA, 2015 to 2017


100

80
-2 +0 +4 +4 +3 +3
60

40
54 54 52 54 56 54 56 60 60
48 52 52 50 53 53 49 54 52
20

0
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2015 2016 2017

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

16
Smarter ELA: The majority of
districts are seeing proficiency gains
from 2015 to 2017
Distrct ELA Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100

+5 +3
+3 +3
+12
75 +10 +8 +4 2017
State ELA
Percent
Proficient:
54%

50

68 66 69 67
64
61
57 60
60 59 62 62
25 49 50 49
44
38 39 41 36 36 39
40
31

0
Seaford Laurel WoodbridgeAppoquinimink Christna Lake Forest Caesar Rodney Indian River
2015 2016 2017
NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

17
Smarter ELA: The majority of
districts are seeing proficiency gains
from 2015 to 2017
Distrct ELA Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100

+1 +1
+2 -2
75 +0 -2
+1 +0 2017
State ELA
Percent
Proficient:
54%
50

65 67 66
59 62 60
54 55 56 51 50 51
55 55 53
25 48 50 49 48 50 48 47 49 45

0
l
in
e en n a ay rd ta ial ar
p yr Cl li fo p i
o n lm
yw nl
o
Sm d Ca ol De
an
d
H e Re M C
r
B pe
Ca
2015 2016 2017
NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

18
Smarter ELA: Charter results varied
from 2015 to 2017
Charter ELA Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100 +1 +1
+10 +2
75 +19
+3
50 96 96 97 93 94 94 2017 State ELA
+13 75 76 77
Percent
Proficient:

55 57
67
+1 54%

25 48 52
36 37 38 40

Not tested
Not tested
25
12 15 15 16 16
8
0
r i r
ve es or n OT y
La
b so te
o m s s to M em n r
D tco te d a ad ay o
Al i a ha
of u o n un Ac te
w k C
m
y
veO e M Fo
s ex Ga e m
o w
ar
d e
s it at ily us ad ons Ne
Ac
a St m S c
Po st Fa A Al
Fir
2015 2016 2017

*NOTES: Charters differ in grade configuraton. Not all schools serve all grades 3-8. Some charters did not test or were not in existence for both testng years shown.
Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

19
Smarter ELA: Charter results varied
from 2015 to 2017
Charter ELA Percent Proficient, Grades 3 to 8, 2015 to 2017
100
-3
-3
75 +0 -1
+0 -13
-9*
50 2017 State ELA

-1* -4
Percent
78 74 79 75
-7 Proficient:
54%
62 59 61 66 64
25 51 51 51 48 46
45
39

Not tested
Not tested

34 31 34 32
27 26 22
20 18 16
11 11
0
y s k r e y l
is o
n
m m ak ee te id m o ba
e om r a r S e ho um
d d tO C h st d c
a sE Ac
a
us
C
re
a
nc
e
yC Ea A ca erS Ku
se t
m ira p G e
tg
e a r
Th
o
s p
C a m
ovid d ys s Ch
A Pr O P re re
ei
Fr

2015 2016 2017


*Comparison between 2016-17 data.
NOTES: Charters differ in grade configuraton. Not all schools serve all grades 3-8. Some charters did not test or were not in existence for both testng years shown.
Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

20
Smarter ELA: Priority school results
varied from 2015 to 2017
Smarter ELA, Percent Proficient, 2015 to 2017

100

75 +19

2017
50 State ELA

+8 +4 -3 Percent
+7 -1 Proficient:
54%

25 48
44
35
29 30 27
21 21 18 18
13 16 12
11 8 9 8 8
0

Middle
(Laurel) Grades 3-5 Grades 3-5 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 3-5
Grades 5-8
2015 2016 2017

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017.

21
ELA results across subgroups reflect continued
commitment to prepare all students for CCR
Change in Percent Proficient in ELA from 2015 to 2017
Subgroup Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
African American -3 2 6 2 4 4
All -2 1 5 4 4 4
Asian -3 1 3 1 2 0
ELL 9 7 5 -1 -2 1
Gap Group -1 1 5 3 4 4
Hispanic -2 2 3 1 4 4
Low Income -1 1 3 3 4 5
Mult-Racial -2 -2 3 10 1 8
SWD -1 0 4 1 2 1
White 0 -1 4 6 4 3

Increased Proficiency Maintained Proficiency Decreased Proficiency

22
Every district met or exceeded the
95% participation benchmark
ELA Math
District
2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017
Appoquinimink School District 97.7 97.5 98.9 96.5 96.8 98.7
Brandywine School District 98.0 94.7 99.0 96.6 96.5 98.6
Caesar Rodney School District 98.4 96.8 99.1 95.9 97.1 99.0
Cape Henlopen School District 97.9 97.5 99.2 96.0 96.9 99.3
Capital School District 97.8 95.0 98.7 95.4 96.2 98.6
Christina School District 93.3 96.2 98.3 91.6 96.6 97.9
Colonial School District 97.0 97.9 98.5 95.6 98.0 98.4
Delmar School District 99.2 99.1 98.9 98.3 99.0 98.9
Indian River School District 97.8 99.2 99.5 97.1 99.1 99.4
Lake Forest School District 98.7 98.2 99.0 97.5 97.8 99.1
Laurel School District 98.5 98.3 99.3 96.1 98.7 99.1
Milford School District 97.7 98.3 98.9 96.9 98.2 98.7
Red Clay Consolidated School 95.6 97.2 98.7 95.6 97.5 98.5
District
Seaford School District 97.8 98.2 99.1 96.1 97.8 98.6
Smyrna School District 98.2 97.8 98.9 98.3 98.2 98.7
Woodbridge School District 97.9 98.8 98.6 98.0 98.8 99.0

23
Every charter met or exceeded the
95% participation benchmark
ELA Math
District
2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017
Prestige Academy 96.1 90.8 96.4 96.1 91.7 95.7
Aspira Academy 99.7 100.0 100.0 99.7 100.0 100.0
Positive Outcomes 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
East Side 96.1 99.2 98.8 96.5 98.8 99.2
Campus Comm 98.9 99.7 100.0 98.2 99.7 99.7
Thomas Edison 99.8 98.2 100.0 99.1 98.7 99.8
Sussex Academy 98.9 99.7 99.7 98.9 99.7 99.7
Family Foundation 98.2 94.4 99.3 98.2 98.1 98.7
Kuumba 98.7 98.3 99.3 98.7 97.7 99.3
Academy of Dover 100.0 99.2 99.1 100.0 97.5 98.2
Odyssey Charter 99.2 99.3 99.5 99.2 99.2 99.3
Providence Creek 99.1 99.1 98.9 98.9 98.8 98.9
MOT 99.6 99.6 98.9 99.6 99.4 98.9
Newark Charter 99.6 99.6 99.6 99.5 99.6 99.6
Gateway Lab 98.0 89.6 95.5 97.4 90.6 97.0
Academia Alonso N/A N/A 100.0 N/A N/A 100.0
First State Montessori 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Great Oaks Charter N/A 95.5 98.2 N/A 93.6 98.8
Freire Charter School N/A 97.2 96.8 N/A 96.4 96.8

24
SAT: More students are proficient
in ERW and Math
Statewide Smarter SAT Results High School

+ 516 + 52
SAT
53% 31% 29%
10,000 53%

8,000 2,671
4,895 2,619

n = 9,252
4,379

n = 9,252

n = 8,366
n = 8,359

6,000

4,000

2,000

0
Not Proficient Proficient

25
SAT Math: Nearly half of schools saw gains in
SAT math proficiency from 2016 to 2017

SAT Math, 2016 to 2017


100

80 +2
+10

60
2017
+10 +9 +6 +3 Math SAT
40 +2 +2 Percent
+4 67 69
Proficient:
29%
54
+3 +2 47
20 38 39 39 36 39 +3

Not tested
33

Not tested

Not tested

Not tested
30 30 32
28 24 28 26 28 23
17
11 14 11 13 13
3
0 y 64
ad
. S. S. S. S. .S
. S. 6 .S
. r .S
. S. r S. ad
. S.
m H. H. H. H. H H. H rte H H. rte H. H.
de Ac H n rk rd ar n st a
el d a
ge Ac b
ca ry EC w ea re Ch r or Ch ry La
A ta T to wa a fo l m
cK Fo k u ilf OT le ta
ex ili LY le N e Se De ar La M ol ili gn
ss M PO id
d M ke ew M yC M si
Su DE M La N
Ea
rl
at
e De
St
rst
Fi
2016 SAT School Day 2017 SAT School Day

NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

26
SAT Math: Math proficiency
from 2016 to 2017

-1 SAT Math, 2016 to 2017


100

80
-7 -9

60 -8
-4 -5
98 97 -3 -4 2017

40 +0 -1 -8 -9 Math SAT
-4 Percent
Proficient:
+0 63
29%
56
+0 -3 -4 45 41 -5 -5 -5 45 -6 -8
47 -10
20 33 32
41 38 42 38
32
40
34
39
29 29 -4 28 31
26
21 21 18 18 +0 20 17 17 13
22
17
22
17 15 16
22 21
10 10 14 11 13
8 **
0 **0 0 0
h S. S. r .S
. r S. S. S. h4 ch S. S. S. h S. ch S. ay
) S. S. 6 S. 63ce54 . S. S. et
y
Te
c H. H. **
a rte H a rte H. H. H. Te
c
Te H. H. H. Te
c H. Te H. Cl H. H. H. en H H. af
- l r r y t - - t -
Vo ra ve Ch i ve Ch ne an on Vo Vo i nk ne on Vo nn e x
go
w
ed pe
n
an
a
o rd
Sc
i n a ge
ic
S
nt Do es R n od as ns
i
uP Pe ss (R nc yr id bl
ge
s e to ki rd tl e im yw on Su as lo st o a d m br
or xC m an ng rR le ic wa s
ui
n n d
.I .
d
gs G l
wa
y n ri C n r S d Pu
e e tco di i sa tP D o l ca
q ra A d He Ch Co oo DE
.G ss Ou In ilm e u n H
De po B Ho l lo e W
St Su ve W Ca M
o
Ap Ca Ca
p
it b
s Ca
Po

2016 SAT School Day 2017 SAT School Day


**Less than 5 percent.
NOTE: Numbers rounded to nearest whole number. Numbers at top represent change from 2015 to 2017. Tech districts are omitted because test covers grades 3-8.

27
SAT ERW: Nearly half of schools saw gains in
SAT ERW proficiency from 2016 to 2017

SAT ERW, 2016 to 2017


100
+2
90
N/A
80 +11 +8
+9 N/A 2017
70 +4
+8 ERW SAT
60 +6 +5 +2 N/A Percent
+2 Proficient:
53%
50
+8 +6 87 89
+2 +1
N/A
40 +20 +8 +3 81
71 72 +6 66
30 60 64 64 60
55 57 53 56
49 49 48 48 50 49
20 43 42 44

Not tested
36 38 37 38

Not tested
Not tested

Not tested
38 35 36
32 30 30 27 29 28 31
10 22 21
12
0
r S. S. h S. S. d. S. S. S. S. h S. S. h r S. h r S. y S.
a rte H. H. Tec H. H. ca H. H. H. H. Tec H. H. Tec a rte H. Tec a rte H. em H.
- r ge A t l k - d r - l - d
Ch ow
n
EC
H
Vo ve ry es an re r Vo or ov
e Vo Ch ra Vo Ch ge a La
b
es et YT rd Ri ri d i ta For c Ke au e wa s af D n rk e nt l e OT lle y Ac n
l L n b l L e e o a t o r g
m d PO wa ia d i ke M N rg S
dg
s w xC s M C ta es
i
u tco M
id Ho nd oo E
M
La G eo o Ne s se e l ca a rl y ili D
I W D . H E M
e
O
St Su D
te re
i tv S ta a wa
s l
Po rst De
Fi

2016 SAT School Day 2017 SAT School Day

28
SAT ERW: SAT ERW proficiency
from 2016 to 2017
SAT ERW, 2016 to 2017
120
-1 -6
100 +0 -3
-2
80
-9 -9 2017
State ERW
+0 -1 -1 Percent
-6 Proficient:
60
-1 53%
+0 -2 -11
-3
99 -3 -7 -16
90 90 87 84 89
40 83
+0 72 70 71
65 65 65 64 61 59 62 64
53 51 56 55
47 45 45 42 50
20 44 44 43
36 33 35 38
28 32
25 25 22

0
S. y .S
. S. 100
te
r .S
.
ch S. S. S. S. S. e y) S. S. S. S. S. r
H. m H H. ar Te H. H. H. H. H. nc la H. H. H. H. H. rte
ad
e
ar tH y t e C a
nk na Ch an e x
or
d
ne in
e n n
on Sc
i
ed e n ow or
d n a o n Ch
i Ac lm ta n as ss ilf Pe uP (R op sg nc yr ns ty
im x
De to od yw d l m i
ui
n
ss
e ri s ng le Su M R d I.
d ra y n l a C o S c k
Sa
fe
Ch i tP sa
r an am A. Co
n wa He
G
Di
o q Su ilm u n e Br illi l lo e l ic
A pp W M
o Ca W Ca Ca
p
Pu
b
a b E
C D

2016 SAT School Day 2017 SAT School Day

29
SAT: Not all districts and charters met
the benchmark this year
SAT Participation 2016 ERW 2017 ERW 2016 Math 2017 Math
Middletown H.S. 96.8 89.2 96.8 89.2
Appoquinimink H.S. 98.7 95.7 98.7 95.7
Brandywine H.S. 91.3 86.1 91.9 86.1
Concord H.S. 97.4 93.4 97.4 93.4
Mount Pleasant H.S. 95.1 91.0 95.1 91.0
Caesar Rodney H.S. 97.4 92.3 97.0 92.3
Cape Henlopen H.S. 95.5 93.9 95.5 93.9
Dover H.S. 95.6 85.1 95.4 85.1
Christiana H.S. 87.8 78.0 87.8 78.0
Glasgow H.S. 96.5 85.1 96.5 85.1
Newark H.S. 81.8 82.1 81.8 82.1
Penn (William) H.S. 89.3 88.2 88.8 88.2
DE Acad of Public Safety and Security 88.9 70.8 88.9 70.8
Delaware Design-Lab H.S. N/A 87.3 N/A 87.3
Delmar H.S. 98.7 98.1 98.7 98.1
Early College H.S. at Del State University N/A 98.6 N/A 98.6
First State Military Academy N/A 100.0 N/A 100.0
Indian River H.S. 98.1 95.4 98.1 95.4
Sussex Central H.S. 96.5 91.4 96.5 91.4
Lake Forest H.S. 99.5 92.3 99.5 92.3
Laurel Senior H.S. 90.3 87.7 90.3 87.7

30
SAT: Not all districts and charters met
the benchmark this year
SAT Participation 2016 ERW 2017 ERW 2016 Math 2017 Math
Milford Senior H.S. 97.8 93.0 97.8 93.0
MOT Charter School N/A 100.0 N/A 100.0
Howard H.S. of Technology 98.1 97.4 98.1 97.4
St. Georges Technical H.S. 99.2 99.6 99.2 99.6
Hodgson (Paul M.) Vo-Tech 98.1 96.5 98.1 96.5
Delcastle Technical H.S. 94.0 94.3 94.0 94.3
Newark Charter School 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
POLYTECH H.S. 99.3 96.2 99.3 96.2
Positive Outcomes Charter School 94.4 100.0 94.4 100.0
Conrad Schools of Science 98.8 97.0 98.8 97.0
Calloway (Cab) School of the Arts 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Dickinson (John) H.S. 89.7 66.4 89.7 66.4
duPont (Alexis I.) H.S. 92.0 83.4 91.7 83.4
McKean (Thomas) H.S. 95.3 80.8 95.3 80.8
Charter School of Wilmington 98.4 97.9 98.4 97.9
Delaware Military Academy 98.6 98.6 98.6 98.6
Seaford Senior H.S. 98.1 95.0 98.2 95.0
Smyrna H.S. 95.9 91.4 95.9 91.4
Sussex Academy of Arts and Sciences 100.0 98.3 100.0 98.3
Sussex Technical H.S. 99.0 98.4 99.0 98.4
Woodbridge H.S. 92.7 87.9 92.7 87.9

31
DCAS-Alt1 ELA and math
proficiency
DCAS-Alt1 ELA and MATH PERCENT PROFICIENT,
100 2015 to 2017

75

50

63 62 64 64 65 66
59 58 58 60 60 59
25 53 50 54 51 50
48

2015 2016 2017

DCAS-Alt1 ELA DCAS-Alt1 Math

32
DCAS Science proficiency
100
DCAS Science, 2015 to 2017

80

60

40

47 47 45 49 49 47
20
44 43 43

0
Gra de 5 Grade 8 Gra de 10

2015 2016 2017

33
DCAS-Alt1 Science proficiency

DCAS-Alt1 Science Proficiency, 2015-2017


100

75

50

68
62 62
25
55 54 55 53 52
42

0
Grade 5 Gra de 8 Grade 10

2015 2016 2017

34
Enhanced Smarter Analytics provides
educators with more information to guide
in-class instruction
Educators can access deeper level student score
information to better determine student
understanding of the claims and targets aligned to
the Delaware standards

Shows Full Claim


Scores
35
Family Guides provide families with resources for
better understanding of what students should learn
each year

Parent Guides provide more informaton


on what a student should have learned last
year and what students should be able to
do this year

Based on the Delaware


standards

Shows how parents can


support their childrens
learning at home

Arrives with the Family


Score Reports

36
The Family Score Report provides meaningful
information on student understanding of the
standards
Family score report helps parents and students better
understand how well students are learning the Delaware
standards

Will be mailed to families this month

Includes detailed informaton


about how students scored on
different parts of ELA/Literacy
and Mathematcs

Shows how students are


progressing through the
standards and across grades

2015 Score Report 2017 Family Score Report

37
Additional Resources for families and
educators available on DelExcels.org
Sample Score Reports
FAQ Documents
Online tools

www.DelExcels.org
38
Appendix
District/Charter results for each grade,
including subgroup scores and participation

Complete data tables are available online at:

https://pubapps.doe.k12.de.us/DSARA_Public/default.aspx

40
Smarter Math: Statewide Cohort
Results
Smarter Math, Statewide Cohort Results, 2015 to 2017
60

50

40

30
53
51
47
44
20 41 41 41 40
38 37 38 37 38
34

10

0
Grade 3 to 5 Grade 4 to 6 Grade 5 to 7 Grade 6 to 8 Gra de 7 to 8

2015 2016 2017

41
Smarter ELA: Statewide Cohort
Results
Smarter ELA, Statewide Cohort Results, 2015 to 2017
70

60

50

40

30 60 60
54 56 54 56 54
52 52 53 53 52
48 50

20

10

0
Gra de 3 to 5 Gra de 4 to 6 Grade 5 to 7 Gra de 6 to 8 Grade 7 to 8

2015 2016 2017

42
Smarter Math: Statewide claim-level
data

Math Claim Level Information

%Below Standard % At/Near Standard % Above Standard

Concepts and Procedures


2015 40 36 24
2016 38 35 27
2017 36 35 30

Problem Solving and Modeling and Data Analysis


2015 29 49 22
2016 27 50 23
2017 29 46 24
Communicating Reasoning
2015 25 53 22
2016 24 51 25
2017 27 49 24

43
Smarter ELA: Statewide claim-level
data

ELA Claim Level information

%Below Standard % At/Near Standard % Above Standard

Reading
2015 28 46 26
2016 26 47 27
2017 26 47 27

Writing
2015 16 65 19
2016 15 65 20
2017 24 49 27
Listening and Speaking
2015 27 48 25
2016 24 49 27
2017 17 63 20
Research/Inquiry
2015 18 55 27
2016 17 53 31
2017 19 51 30

44
Elementary School

80%

70% Elementary School Trends Over 5 Years


60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
State of Del aware Bra ndywine Cape Henl open Chri stna Del mar La ke Forest Mi l ford Seaford Woodbri dge

2013 Grade 5 % Profici ent 2014 Grade 5 % Profici ent 2015 Gra de 5 % Profici ent 2016 Grade 5 % Profici ent 2017 Grade 5 % Profici ent
Middle School

Middle School Science Trends over 5 Years


90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
State of Del awa re Brandywi ne Cape Henl open Chri stna Del ma r La ke Forest Mi l ford Seaford Woodbri dge
2013 Gra de 8 % Profici ent 2014 Gra de 8 % Profici ent 2015 Gra de 8 % Profici ent 2016 Grade 8 % Profici ent 2017 Gra de 8 % Profici ent
High School

High School Trends over 5 Years


80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ar
e
in
k
in
e ey en ta
l
na al ar ve
r s t
re
l
rd CV
T c h a y rd na ec
h
dg
e
n p pi t i m Ri re u o te Cl fo yr
aw im dy
w od lo Ca ri s on el Fo La ilf N C ly d ea Sm ex
T
b ri
el in r R n Ch Co
l D an ke M Po Re S
ss od
D u an a He nd
i
La o
of p oq Br es pe I S u
W
at
e
Ap Ca Ca
St

2013 Grade 10 % Profici ent 2014 Gra de 10 % Profici ent 2015 Gra de 10 % Profici ent 2016 Gra de 10 % Profici ent 2017 Grade 10 % Profici ent
Elementary School Charters

Charter School Elementary Science Trends over 3 Years


100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
r i ay r r
ar
e ve i ty on ns or i ra OT rte rte ee
k
aw
o un is
at
o ss ew p M a a Cr
el f D m Ed te a t As Ch h
D yo m nd on G s k yC nc
e
of Co ou i ca ar s e e
e em s yF te
M
er ew ys id
at ad pu il ta Am N Od rov
St Ac m m S P
Ca Fa rst La
s
Fi

2015 Gra de 5 2015 % Profici ent 2016 Gra de 5 2016 % Profici ent 2017 Gra de 5 2017 % Profici ent
Middle School Charters

Charter School Middle School Science Trends over 3 Years


100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
r r
re i ty so
n
ta
ry
ie
re
wa
y
ba pi
ra OT rte rte es tg
e
ee
k m
y
wa un i ili Fr te um M a ha
m es Cr e
l a m Ed a As Ch tco Pr ad
De
M G Ku s yC ce Ac
Co
m
at
e i ca ar
k e Ou n x
of St er w ys
s e de se
e s e tv ov
i s
at pu rst Am N Od si Pr Su
St m Fi s Po
Ca La

2015 Gra de 8 2015 % Profici ent 2016 Gra de 8 2016 % Profici ent 2017 Gra de 8 2017 % Profici ent
High School Charters

Charter School High School Science Trends over 3 Years


100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
ry r y
re PS
S
La
b
ta ie
re OT rte es m
wa DA ili Fr M a m e
l a gn Ch tco ad
D e si M k Ou Ac
De te ar ex
of ta w e
e De tS e tv us
s
at rs N si S
St Fi Po

2015 Grade 10 2015 % Profici ent 2016 Grade 10 2016 % Profici ent 2017 Gra de 10 2017 % Profici ent