There is a persistent shortfall between revenues and spending and it could get worse The planned initiative of aligning the tax rates of the employed and self-employed announced in Britains budget was avoided The major reason being the because of the fear of angry voters. The government had promised at the 2015 election not to raise income tax, national insurance or VATthree taxes that raise around two-thirds of revenues. Differences in receipts and Spending Measure adopted
Countries that have their own central banks have been
able to lower their interest rates (reducing the cost of servicing the debt) and to pursue quantitative easing (QE) programmes that actually buy the debt. As a result, net debt payments are actually lower as a proportion of GDP . Problems
First, they have tended to focus on social spending that
tends to benefit the poorest in societies. Second, they have also cut capital budgetsspending on infrastructure such as schools, hospitals and roads. This latter category is probably the most useful form of Keynesian stimulus. There must be plenty of infrastructure projects with a net positive return if the cost of borrowing is 1-2% The fundamental problem is that OECD populations are getting older, which implies a steady increase in spending on health and pensions. That will make it very hard to bring overall spending down. Meanwhile the proportion of the population that is of working age is set to declinenot good for tax revenues. The top 1% of Population pay 27% of all income tax receipts. Governments are competing to reduce corporation tax rates to attract multinationals. Because of low rates it is not affecting severely. If interest rates were higher it would have resulted in more interest payments from GDP. If the government cannot raise the taxes needed to finance the spending their voters want, then it could result in permanent central bank intervention in the economy