Most business enterprises that employ more than a few dozen
people are organized as corporations. The overall purpose of corporation is to maximize the long term return to the owners (shareholders). A corporation is a mechanism established to allow different parties to contribute capital, expertise and labor for their mutual benefit. The investor/shareholders participates in the profits of the enterprise without taking responsibility of the operations. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The term corporate governance refers to the relationship among various participants in determining the direction and performance of the corporations. The primary participants are: -The shareholders -The Management -Board of Directors RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTICIPANTS
Management (Headed by CEO)
Shareholders Board of Directors
(Owners) RESPONSIBILITIES OF BOD 1. Setting corporate strategy, overall direction, mission or vision 2. Hiring and firing the CEO and top management 3. Controlling, monitoring or supervising top management 4. Reviewing and approving the use of resources 5. Caring for shareholders interests. ROLE OF THE BOARD IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Monitor acting through its committees, a board can keep abreast of developments inside and outside the corporation, bringing to managements attention developments it might have overlooked. A board should at least carry out this task. Evaluate and Influence A board can examine managements proposals, decisions, and actions, agree or disagree with them, give advise, offer suggestions, and outline alternatives. Active board performs this task in addition to be monitoring one. Initiate and determine A board can delineate a corporations mission and specify strategic options to its management. Only the most active boards take on this task in addition to the two previous ones. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The board of most publicly owned corporations are composed of both inside and outside directors.
INSIDE DIRECTORS are typically officers or executives
employed by the corporation.
OUTSIDE DIRECTORS may be executives of other firms
but are not employees of the boards corporation. TRENDS IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Boards are getting more involved not only in reviewing and evaluating company strategy but also in shaping it. Institutional investors, such as pension funds, mutual funds, and insurance companies, are becoming active on boards and are putting increasing pressure on top management to improve corporate performance. Shareholders are demanding that directors and top managers own more than token amounts of stock in the corporation. Stock is increasingly being used as part of a directors compensation. Non-affiliated outside directors are increasing their numbers and power in publicly held corporations as CEOs loosen their grips on boards. Outside members are taking charge of annual CEO evaluation. Boards are getting smaller, not only because of the reduction in the number of insiders but also because boards desire new directors to have specialized knowledge and expertise instead of general experience. THE ROLE OF TOP MANAGEMENT The top management function is usually conducted by the CEO of the corporation in coordination with the COO or President, Executive Vice President, and Vice Presidents of divisions and functional areas. Even though strategic management involves everyone in the organization, the board of directors holds top management that is primarily responsible for the strategic management of the firm. RESPONSIBILITIES OF TOP MANAGEMENT Top management responsibilities, especially those of the CEO, involved getting things accomplished through and with others in order to meet the corporate objectives. Top managements job is thus multidimensional and is oriented toward the welfare of the total organization. EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGIC VISION Executive leadership is the directing of activities toward the accomplished of corporate objectives. Executive leadership is important because it sets the tone for the entire corporation. Strategic Vision is a description of what the company is capable of becoming. It is often communicated in the mission statement. People in an organization want to have a sense of mission, but only top management is in the position to specify and communicate this strategic vision to the general workforce. 3 KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF CEO 1. The CEO articulates a strategic vision for the corporation. the CEO envisions the company not as it currently is, but as it can become.
2. The CEO presents a role for others to identify with and to follow. the leader sets an example in terms of behaviour.
3. The CEO communicates high performance standards and also
shows confidence in the followers abilities to meet these standards. No leader ever improved performance by setting easily attainable goals that provided no challenge. STRATEGIC PLANNING STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Identify and analyse company wide strategic issues and suggest corporate strategic alternatives to top management. 2. Work as facilitators with business units to guide them through the strategic planning process. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF STRATEGIC DECISION MAKERS The concept of social responsibility proposes that a private corporation has responsibilities to society that extend beyond making a profit. Strategic decisions often affect more than just the corporations. RESPONSIBILITIES OF A BUSINESS FIRM
What are the responsibilities of a business firm,
and how many of them must be fulfilled?
Milton Friedman and Archie Carroll offer two
contrasting views of the responsibilities of business firms to society. FRIEDMANS TRADITIONAL VIEW OF BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY Friedman referred to the social responsibility of business as a fundamentally subversive doctrine and stated that: There is one and only one social responsibility of business to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud. CARROLLS 4 RESPONSIBILITIES OF BUSINESS 1. Economic responsibilities of business organizations management are to produce goods and services of value to society so that the firm can repay its creditors and shareholders. 2. Legal responsibilities - are governments laws that management is expected to obey. For example, U.S. business firms are required to hire and promote people based on their credentials rather than to discriminate based on non-job-related characteristics such as race, gender, or religion. 3. Ethical Responsibilities of an organizations management are to follow the generally held beliefs about behavior in a society. For example, society generally expects firms to work with the employees and the community in planning for layoffs, even though no law may require this. The affected people can get very upset if an organizations management fails to act according to generally prevailing ethical values. CARROLLS 4 RESPONSIBILITIES OF BUSINESS 4. Discretionary responsibilities are the purely voluntary obligations a corporation assumes. Examples are philanthropic contributions, training the hard core unemployed and providing for day care centers. The difference between ethical and discretionary responsibilities is that few people expect an organization to fulfill discretionary responsibilities whereas many expect an organization to fulfill ethical ones. CORPORATE STAKEHOLDERS (ICE) The concept that business must be socially responsible sounds appealing until we as, Responsible to whom?
A corporations task environment includes a large
number of groups with interest in a business organizations activities. These groups are referred to as corporate stakeholders because they affect or are affected by the achievement of the firms objectives. BUSINESS ETHICS Business ethics (also known as corporate ethics) is a form of applied ethics or professional ethics that examines ethical principles and moral or ethical problems that arise in a business environment. It applies to all aspects of business conduct and is relevant to the conduct of individuals and entire organizations.
Some people joke that there is no such thing as business ethics
they call it an oxymoron a concept that combines opposite or contradictory ideas. MORAL RELATIVISM Some people justify their seemingly unethical position by arguing that there is no one absolute code of ethics and that morality is relative. Simply out, moral relativism claims that morality is relative to some personal, social or cultural standard and that there is no method for deciding whether one decision is better than another. KOLHBERGS 3 LEVELS OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT: 1. The pre-conventional level is characterized by a concern for self. Small children and others who have not progressed beyond this stage evaluate behaviors on the basis of personal interest avoiding punishment or quit pro quo. 2. The conventional level is characterized by considerations of societys laws and norms. Actions are justified by an external code of conduct. 3. The principled level is characterized by a persons adherence to an internal moral code. The individual at this level looks beyond norms or laws to find. CODE OF ETHICS
Code of ethics specify how an organization
expects its employees to behave while on the job. Developing code of ethics can be a useful way to promote ethical behavior, especially for people who are operating at Kolhbergs conventional level of moral development. GUIDELINES FOR ETHICAL BEHAVIOR Ethics is defined as the consensually accepted standards of behavior for an occupation, a trade or a profession. Morality, in contrast is the precepts of personal behavior that are based on religious or philosophical grounds. Law refers to formal codes that permit or forbid certain behavior and may or may not enforce ethics or morality. 1. Utilitarian approach this approach proposes that actions and plans should be judged by their consequences. Utility does it optimize the satisfaction of all stakeholders? 2. Individual rights approach this approach proposes that human beings have certain fundamental rights that should be respected in all decisions. Rights does it respect the rights of the individuals involved? GUIDELINES FOR ETHICAL BEHAVIOR 3. Justice approach this approach proposes that decision makers be equitable, fair and impartial in the distribution of costs and benefits to individuals and groups. Justice is it consistent with the canons of justice?