Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
UTILITARIANISM AS
TELEOLOGICAL-
CONSEQUENTIALIST SY STEMS
REFERENCE:
ought to live.
O Presupposes that it is NOT to do so but that
NOT doing so is UNWISE. Logically committed
to admit that it is possible to act motivated by
interests other than our own pleasure, but it
claims that doing so is a bad idea -> somehow
immoral to do so.
EPICURUS (341-270 B.C.)
O Most prominent hedonists
in his time but was not able
to distinctions between the
two forms of hedonism.
O Ancients did not always
conceive ethics the way we
do. They were Platonic-like
quest, looking for the
GOOD.
O Epicurus thought that this
GOOD was PLEASURE.
FOR IT IS TO OBTAIN THIS END
THAT WE ALWAYS ACT, NAMELY,
TO AVOID PAIN AND FEAR
AND FOR THIS CAUSE WE CALL
PLEASURE THE BEGINNING AND
THE END OF THE BLESSED LIFE.
There are two kinds of desires, hence two
kinds of pleasure as result of gratifying
those desires:
O Natural Desire
O Necessary (desire for food and sleep)
O Unnecessary (desire for sex)
O Vain Desire
(desire for decorative clothing or exotic food)
O Natural necessary desires
must be satisfied and are easy
to satisfy. They result in a
good deal of pleasure and in
very few painful consequences
IT IS BETTER TO BE SOCRATES
DISSATISFIED THAN A FOOL SATISFIED
the fool only know their own side of the question and the other
party to the comparison knows both.
PROBLEMS OF UTILITARIANISM-
O It appears that morality must essentially have
something to do with promoting happiness and well-
being while minimizing unhappiness and misery.
O It would be very odd to think that some act was good
even though it brought nothing unhappiness and misery
to absolutely everybody. Still some serious problems
arise like its consequentialist nature (has to be dealt
with shortly), and he other has to do with the notions of
justice and meritoriousness.
O ACT UTILITARIANISM contends that we should act so as to
produce the greatest amount of happiness for the most
people. In other words, before acting, ask yourself this: What
will be the consequences of my action? If the consequences
are good, the actions is right; if they are bad, then the action is
wrong. For act utilitarian, THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS.
O RULE UTILITARIANISM- in contemplating one of two acts, a
person should perform that act governed by a (hypothetical)
rule whose general obedience would produce the greatest
amount of happiness. Ethicist point out that we get into so
many dilemmas when we apply the greatest happiness
principle to a particular act rather than to the general rule that
the act implements. What we should be concerned with is
following the rules that have the best consequences, not with
carrying out that has the best consequences.
Some Implications...
O An act is GOOD or BAD only in terms of its
CONSEQUENCES.
O Acts that result in happiness, well-being, and flourishing
are good; acts that result in the opposite are bad. We also
feel that some acts those performed out of moral duty
are right independent of their moral consequences.
ON SEX - -
Are some forms of sex like adultery, incest, extramarital sex
morally deficient or are there limits to what is morally
permissible in sex?
RULE UTILITARIANISM
ACT UTILITARIANISM: Focuses on broader social effects more explicitly
Any action is morally permissible, if it and asses whether the long term social
produces greater pleasure than pain. consequences of moral rules that permits these
activities might harm or benefit society.
UTILITARIAN
MORALITY-
urges one to look beyond the immediate pleasure and
look at the effects of our actions to the society and to
the future. When seen in a wider perspective, sexual
activities like incest, is condemned wrongful because of
its harmful wider effects to the individual and, thus, to
the society.
The problem of justice and
meritoriousness:
CASE 1:
The problem of justice
and meritoriousness:
CASE 2:
O UTILITARIANISM GIVES IMMENSE
EMPHASIS ON THE CONSEQUENCE OF
THE ACT RATHER THAN THE ACT ITSELF.
O BUT, IT RUNS TO THE INTUITION OF THE
MANY THAT SOME ACTS, LIKE WANTON
CRUELTY, ARE BAD IN ITSELF
REGARDLESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES.
O ANOTHER IS THE ACT PERFORMED ON
MORAL DUTY ARE RIGHT INDEPENDENT
OF THEIR MORAL CONSEQUENCES.