Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Systems
Pascal Ravesteyn
UU/HU - 2007
General overview
Introduction
What is BPMS?
Research question
BPMS implementation framework
Assignment
Introduction
Business Process Management: the Third Wave
(Smith, Fingar, 2003)
Internet
Globalization
Governance (SOX, Tabaksblatt)
Outsourcing
Source: CIOinsight (2006)
View of processes and organization
So
BPMS
A new IT
software category that supports
organization the entire
Business lifecycle of modeling,
organization
executing, and monitoring business processes
What is
Business Process Management
(System)
History BPMS
Number Total Quality Management Business Process Reengineering
1 Process orientation Process orientation
2 Customer focus (intern and Customer focus (mainly external)
extern)
3 Support and commitment of Support and commitment of
employees and management employees and management
Management Concepts: 4
5
Requires cultural change
Cross-functional teams to analyze
Requires cultural change
Cross-functional teams to redesign
Total Quality Management and resolve quality problems processes
Root Characteristic
Business Process Re-engineering 67 BPR Improve existing work processes
Focus on
Continuous
Develop entirely new processes
external customers One-time project
change
8 BPR Process change
descriptions (graphical)Project radical ness
Business Proces Management 9 TQM
Evolutionary
Measurement
Focus on individual and control of process
process Focusperformance
on core processes
TQM Continuous optimization of processes
Etc.
activities
10BPR Use Implementation
of statistics to ofmeasureautomated processes
creative use of ITacross functional
to enable new
departments
improvement processes
IT Innovations 11TQM / BPR'self-renewal
Culture change
learning' culture As few people as possible should
Systematic
with all employees automation
involved of core bebusiness processes
involved by integrating
in the performance of all
a
Enterprise Resource Planning software applications that support these
process
Table 2 Characteristics of Business Process Management
processes
Workflow Management Table 1 based on Jarrar and Aspinwall (1999); Hackman and Wageman (1995)
Mana
geme BPM
Interface
Layer
Web
nt Co Presentation Presentation
Service
ncept An y Process
Process
Layer
Calculation General Workflow System and User Interactions
BPMS
AFEs
Business Level
Objects
Production
Business Level
Objects
Business
Inv oices Anything
Rules
Layer
Business Lev el Business Level
Obj ects Objects
Business Level Objects
Self-Generating Integration
ti o ns
va
API
Inno EAI
Layer
IT Web
Service XML
SAP using
java
MSMQ using
com or java
Excel using
com
Databases using
jdbc
WFM
ERP
Databases
85 90 95 98 00 05 time
Ravesteyn, 2007
History of SOA
computing
WWW
Business
IBM PC
Mainframe SQL Content: data &
R/3
Databases Data Warehouse Business logic
Client/Server WSDL
Distribution
technology
VT3270 CORBA MQ
Remote access &
VT100 RPC NFS EJB
EAI infrastructure
SOAP
TCP/IP WWW
sockets
Modula2
Programming
Smalltalk Implementation
language
Interface
Layer
Portal/ Web
Forms/ Service
Presentation Presentation
WSDL
An y Process
Process
Process
Layer
Designer
Calculation General Workflow System and User Interactions
AFEs Production
Component Business Level
Objects
Business Level
Objects
Business
Self-Generating Integration
Back end \ Systems
Existing
Layer
Systems
BPMS
Complexity of
coordination
EAI
Application
server
low
low high
Frequency
of change
Process
enabled
agility
networked flexibility
maintainability
fundamental
Not feasible
Scope of
Intra Cross Cross Simple Complex Business integration
departmental departmental Bus. unit B2B Processes
integration
Intra Cross-enterprise
enterprise
To accomplish this.
Research Activities and Articles
Literature Research
Framework & Model
Validation (qualitative & quantitative)
Case Studies
CONCEPT BPR TQM BPM WFM EAI BI/BAM BPMS Other
Number ARTICLE
1 Aalst (2002) X
Conceptueel Empirisch
2 Aalst, et al(2003) X X X
Case studies
3 Aalst, Hee (2004) X
Theoretisch
Modelmatig
4 Aguilar-Savn, Ruth (2004) X X
Surveys
5 Al-Mashari, Zairi (1999) X
6 Anzbck, Dustdar (2005) Nummer ARTIKEL KRITISICHE SUCCESFACTOREN ZOALS GENOEMD IN ARTIKEL (niet alles is KSF, soms betreft het aspecten zoals uit artikel
X naar voren komt)
7 Arkin(2002) X
when modeling a when altering private
SCIENTIFIC METHOD
2 Aalst, et al(2003) Not applicable
14 Box, Platts (2005) 3 Aalst, Hee (2004) Not applicable X
Wetenschappelijk
15 Burlton (2001) X
Cross-sectional
Cross-sectional
Longitudinaal
Longitudinaal
16 akular, Wijngaarden (2002) Is it possible to use X
17 Chang (2006) modelingtechniques X
that are related to the
18 Cunningham, Finnegan (2004) 4 Aguilar-Savn, Ruth (2004)
X
type of company? X
19 Datastream (2005) management X
20 Davenport (2000) competency and organisational project planning and X
21 Deming (1982) ARTICLE 5 Al-Mashari,X
Zairi (1999) change management support structure management IT infrastructure
6 Anzbck, Dustdar (2005) Not applicable
22 Dennis, et al (2006) Aalst (2002) X X
7 Arkin(2002) Not applicable
23 Es, et al (2005) Aalst, et al(2003) X X Build Improve
24 Fremantle, et al (2002) Aalst, Hee (2004) X DesignateXa process X Understand the Work on the trade- Teach others about Train within the X specialist the
25 Georgakopoulos (1999)Aguilar-Savn, Ruth (2004) 8 X
Armistead (1996) X
champion X
Know the process linkages offs the process process Measure the process Manage careers expertise process
26 Grefen, De Vries (1998) Al-Mashari, Zairi (1999) organization XX organization
9 Armistead, Machin (1997) coordination process definition structuring cultural fit improvement measurement
27 Gulledge, Sommer (2002)Anzbck, Dustdar (2005) X X X
28 Hammer, Champy (2001) Arkin(2002) X X
delay the technology
29 Harrington (1995) Armistead (1996) X X
use of a well-defined evaluation until take into account the
Armistead, Machin (1997) and practical method accurately select use a standard X
process reverse industrial partners
30 Hill (1999) X X
Aversano, et al (2002) to reverse engineer process owners X and listen to process X use multiple data draw early drafts of process modeling engineering
31 Hillegersberg, et al (2004) X is and the target
Becker, et al (2003) 10 Aversano, et al (2002) processes key users owners and key users gathering approaches process maps language finished environment
32 Informatica (2005) X
Bhatt, Stump (2001) X
33 Ishikawa (1986) Bhatt, Troutt (2005)
X Integration of CRM X
34 Jablonski (1995) Box, Platts (2005) X and SCM data from
X X
35 Jarrar, Aspinwall (1999) an operative (EAI)
Burlton (2001) X X X perspective and a
36 Jeston, Nelis (2006) akular, Wijngaarden (2002) X X
Involvement of The effectiveness of management (data
37 Jeston, Nelis (2006) Chang (2006) X
management as ManagementX datawarehouses for The availability of warehouses and
38 Juopperi, et al (1995)Cunningham, Finnegan (2004) targeted users of the understandingXand business process X data within the Supply decision support
39 Juran (1945) Datastream (2005) 11 Becker, etXal (2003) system support X integration Chain systems) perspective
40 Juran (1951) Davenport (2000) X X to enable Top management
communication for global inter- support is critical to
41 Karagiannis (1995) Deming (1982) X X X
among IS systems operability, establish Network
42 Kettinger, et al (1997) Dennis, et al (2006) X standardization is transparency to the Integrative capability connectivity and
X
43 Khoshaflan (2006) Es, et al (2005) 12 Bhatt, Stump (2001) needed end user is neededX of IS networks Network Flexibility X
44 Kim, Ramkaran (2004) Fremantle, et al (2002)X 13 Bhatt, Troutt (2005) Not applicable
X X
45 Klen, et al (2001) Georgakopoulos (1999) X X X
46 Kobayashi (2003) Grefen, De Vries (1998) X XX X single
47 Koedijk, Verstelle (1999)Gulledge, Sommer (2002) X
X point
Hammer, Champy (2001) X
48 Kuo (2004) X accountab
Harrington (1995) X X ility; each
49 Laudon, Laudon (2000) X
Hill (1999) X person
50 Lee, Dale (1998) Hillegersberg, et al (2004) X
X
a clear should
Informatica (2005) X make sure path must fully
Ishikawa (1986) X X that be created understan
Jablonski (1995) X people from d her role
that are corporate in
Jarrar, Aspinwall (1999) X
engaged strategy to achieving
Jeston, Nelis (2006) X to the strong project the overall
Jeston, Nelis (2006) X project leadership goals, and objective
Juopperi, et al (1995) X can attach is ultimately and be
Juran (1945) X X create challenging rewards & incentives their own essential to team accountab
Juran (1951) X translate project
X assign the best roles and new job when deliverables are meaning for and le for
Karagiannis (1995) X objectives into very
X formulate a business deliver on the good executive possible people to the perspectives after the met before time, with to the effective individual his/her
14 Box, Platts (2005) involve many people specific deliverables case business case involvement (sponsor) project full time project higher quality etc. project change objectives tasks
Kettinger, et al (1997) X X X X
Khoshaflan (2006) X
Kim, Ramkaran (2004) X
Business Process Management
Framework
Monitoring & Control
BI / BAM
BPMS
WFM
TQM Bus.
Strategy & Policy
Organization
Proc. EAI Information
& Processes Technology
Model.
BPR
Ravesteyn, 2006
Business Process Management System
Implementation approach
This list was based upon the principles according to the following
composition:
3.86% of the factors came from TQM
17.51% from BPR
29.97% BPM
11.57% WFM
12.76% EAI (incl. SOA)
2.08% BAM
12.17% from the BPMS domain
10.08% from various other related areas
Business Process Management System
Implementation approach
Organizational domain
(Ravesteyn, 2007)
Management of Organization & Processes
Formal models
Analysis Visualisation
For different
Design
stakeholders
Napkin
Whiteboard Idea Architecture Use
Powerpoint process
Link with
Management
implementation
Maintenance
Version control
Results Results
Results
Conclusion
(validation method & overall results)
Resources
BPM Forum
Suppliers (BEA (Fuego), Cordys, IBM,
Microsoft, SAP, Seebeyond, Tibco,
Webmethods etc.)
Consultancy Organizations (Capgemini,
InterAccess, LogicaCMG, Ordina etc.)
Users (Interpay, ING, ABN-AMRO, Nuon etc.)
Questions?