Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2. Analysis
Layout: Does everything seem to be in the right place?
Flow: Does the content appear in a natural and logical progression?
Usability: Is it easy to use or interact with the design solution?
Typography: Does the type feel appropriate in tone?
Color: How is color used? What effect does it have in terms of conveying the
desired message?
Completeness: Is anything missing? Conversely, is anything there that
shouldnt be?
ThE 4 EssEnTIALs OF A dEsIgn cRITIquE.
3. Interpretation
Audience: How do you think the target audience will respond to this
solution? Why? Why not?
Details: Is the use of these particular graphic elements consistent with the
goals of the project? Why? Why not?
Problem areas: What things in this solution are not as effective as they
could be? Why do you think that?
Appeal: Is this an effective and appealing design for the context it will
live in? Why? Why not?
4. Evaluation
Brief: Does this design fulfill the creative brief. If not, why not?
Judgment: Given the answers to the above, does this design work?
Specifications Considered For Design
Critique
For Critiquing a design document should be:
Complete - No information is missing
Clear - Every sentence's meaning must be clear to all parties
Consistent - The writing style and notation is consistent throughout the
document and the document does not contradict itself.
Verifiable - All facts stated are verifiable
6. The User shall be able to store and view No details mentioned in SDD.
messages. Only in data flow diagram the
information about message is
present in whole document.
8. The User shall be able to add family photos, No information regarding this
images of records, videos, and more. requirement in SDD
Summary Of DESIGN Critiquing
The proposed system is a mobile application which helps the end users to
maintain their family members information and interests.
By considering our parameters for critique, we found that design
document structure is good according to IEEE template but a missing
System Overview which reduces quality of document.
we found this design document was well researched and written. Minor
errors were noted, but information included was correct, relevant.
There were some cases of incompleteness within mapping of functional
requirement to system components.
However, the SDD were thorough in most areas with their explanations,
and with the aid of Use case, sequence Diagrams, E-R Diagrams, and
Data Diagrams, the document was clear and concise.
Thank you.
Any queries?