Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NETWORKS
(WIRELESS BACKHAUL)
Introduction
Point to Point (PTP) Microwave technology provides
dedicated point to point connectivity using directional
antennas. A microwave link is a communication system that
uses a beam of radio waves in the microwave frequency
range to transmit video, audio, or data between two
locations, which can be from just a few meters to several
kilometers apart. PTP links typically require clear Line of
Sight (LOS) between the transmitting antennas.
Components
A simple one-way microwave link includes
four major elements:
Transmitter
Receiver
Transmission Lines
Antennas
Transmitter
The transmitter produces a microwave signal that
carries the information to be communicated. The
transmitter has two fundamental functions: generating
microwave energy at the required frequency and power
level, and modulating it with the input signal so that it
conveys meaningful information. Modulation is
accomplished by varying some characteristic of the
energy in response to the transmitter’s input.
Transmission line
The transmission line carries the signal from the transmitter to the antenna
and, at the receiving end of the link, from the antenna to the receiver. At
called Power over Ethernet (PoE): the data and power for the radio is
carried over a single UTP/STP Ethernet cable. This has further reduced the
end, the antenna emits the microwave signal from the transmission line into
free space. At the receiver site, an antenna pointed toward the transmitting
station collects the signal energy and feeds it into the transmission line for
Antennas used in microwave links are highly directional, which means they
tightly focus the transmitted energy, and receive energy mainly from one
transmission links:
Range: Microwave point to point links can support range of up to 100 km. Microwave
radio communication requires clear line-of-sight (LOS) between the respective
endpoints. Increase in range typically requires higher antenna heights to account for the
“earth bulge”.
Frequency Bands: Microwave PTP links operate in Licensed and Unlicensed frequency
bands. (1) Licensed frequency bands require expensive license. However there are
multiple benefits associated with using licensed frequencies including the following:
Technical Characteristics cont’d...
(2) Unlicensed frequency bands offer the benefits of no licensing cost and lower equipment cost.
However the following need to be considered when using unlicensed frequencies:
TDD: Transmission and reception occurs during separate time slots. TDD
Network Topologies
Wireless Backhaul Topologies: Analyzing Backhaul Topology
Strategies
INTRODUCTION
The demand for new high-speed mobile data services has caused network
migration plans. The planning process must take complex network topology
the pros and cons of tree and ring topologies, with special attention to cost
considerations.
BACKHAUL NETWORK TOPOLOGIES
There are many parameters to be considered when selecting a network topology,
and even more when it comes to radio networks – where Line-Of-Sight (LOS),
rain zone and other propagation factors are taken into account, as well as
CHAIN
STAR
RINGS
NOTE:
The tree topology in itself is a combination of two other basic topologies – the chain
Star topologies use a separate link from a hub to each site or is used to provide
This is very simple, but inefficient for microwave systems, as it requires longer
radio links and a LOS for each link (which may be impossible). The star topology
also makes for very poor frequency reuse, since all the links originate at the same
point, and interference is more likely to occur between links using the same
frequency.
CHAIN NETWORK TOPOLOGY
Chain topology is used for connectivity between two sites with clear Line of Sight
(LOS).
In chain topologies, all sites reside on a single path – solving the problems inherent
to star topologies, but resulting in a very sensitive topology in which the first link
malfunction can cause a complete network failure. Therefore, most of the links
should be protected.
TREE NETWORK TOPOLOGY
Tree topology is the combination of the Chain and the Star topologies.
In a tree topology, only fewer links can cause major network failures and hence,
Closing the chain yields the ring, which is the most efficient topology in terms
of protection.
single link will not affect traffic flow between any two sites on the ring.
CASE STUDY #1
ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES OF THE TREE AND RING NETWORK
TOPOLOGY TYPES
Focusing on the ring and the tree, we will discuss the advantages and
TEST CASE #1
Our test case describes a typical radio cluster with one fiber site and 10 cell
assumes that every link that supports more than one site needs to be protected.
Several aggregation topologies are suggested - tree, single ring, and a hybrid
"tree of rings", consisting of two smaller rings. The tree uses protected links
Comparing the networks’ fixed assets cost, we can see that the ring requires
links, usually at a higher cost and consuming more spectrum. The ring also
straight forward, and can vary depending on the particular case. Another
factor influencing cost is spectrum reuse. Since rings have no more than
two links at every node, better frequency reuse is usually achieved and rings
A clear cut advantage of ring topology is its superior resiliency. The protected
tree is indeed protected against equipment failures, but does not provide any
transmission).
Consider the storm scenario shown in the figure below. In the test case, this
site is subject to complete failure (due to heavy rain or power failure), causing
failure in four other sites in the tree, but no other sites in the ring.
Resiliency :Protection Schemes in a Storm Scenario
A disadvantage of the ring topology is that it takes more radio hops to reach
distant sites. If designed properly, the shortest path can be selected for each
traffic flow, but in case of a protection switch due to a cut in the ring, traffic
can flow over N-1 hops in an N-node ring. The number of hops can be an issue
when considering latency and delay variation, adversely affecting the delivery
of synchronization signals. Still, when considering the smaller number of hops
in the tree, one should remember that some of the tree’s links offer lower
bandwidth than those in the ring, with negative implications for delay
variation, so this drawback is subject to debate. As an alternative, the
maximum number of hops can be limited using a ring-tree combination,
employing several smaller rings, as shown above.
Capacity & Scalability