Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
How Star’s
performance
compares with
its industry • The highest pre-interest margin among
peers •
the leading paper companies in India.
The second highest RONW among the
leading paper companies in India.
Source: Capital Market magazine (11 April 2005)
Intra-industry comparison, 2003-4
discounting
contd.
• Net earnings discounted a little
over 5 times for 2004-5 results.
• Lower than peer discounting on
Improving retrospective results.
results • Almost half the industry P/E of
but poor 11 (source: Capital Market, 11
Star: Indian 20
Profit after tax (Rs cr) 20.17
paper 15
11.56
industry’s
10
6.49 7.02
attractive 0
2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
27.69 28.52
growth proxy
30
15 12.75
8.64
10
0
2001- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
• Positive EVA for two years
leading to 2004-5.
• Increasing ROCE for each
of three years leading to
Enhancing 2004-5.
value
ploughed back into assets,
11 per cent paid out as
dividend.
• Payout ratio of 17.5 per
cent in 2004-5, a balance
between reinvestment and
payout.
contd.
28.06
30
25
23.34
Enhancing 20
14.19
18.22
shareholder
15
25
10
20.06
value 20
15
9.41
13.86
5
0
2001- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
8.93 Return on average
10
capital employed (%)
5
0
2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
1.75
1. 8
1.5 64.48
1. 6 Return on net worth (%) 70
1. 4
60 53.5
1. 2 1 46.6 47.8
50
1
0.8 40
0.5
0.6 30
0.4
20
0.2
10
0
2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
0
Dividend (Rs per share) 2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
contd.
Distribution • Retail customers serviced
through 50 nationwide
and reach distributors, Star’s primary
customers; 8% increase in
dealer throughput in 2004-5.
• Presence in 13 Indian states
through the dealer network.
• 85 per cent of the company’s
distributors have been the
company’s channel partners
for at least 10 years.
• Some distributors represent
the fourth generation working
with the company.
Some of the key customers/users
•HLL •Meghdoot Laminates
•Eveready •Novino Batteries
•ITC Limited •Waterproof corporation
•Thomson Press •Sri Kaleswari Fireworks
•Gopson Papers •Standard Fireworks
Eclectic .
•Pearson Education •Speciality Coatings
customer •Replica Press •Sri Krishna Paper
Production (MT)
• A decline in raw material cost as a
proportion of turnover from 26% in
0
2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
522000
600000
410400
500000
Estimated 400000
265000
270000
250660
211573
generation of
225703
234000
218724
217800
210336
300000
158400
wood vs 200000
requirement 0
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
Government wood
Raw material
scenario:
100
96
91
89
90
Increasing use of
78
80
77
social forestry 70
resources in Star 60
50
40
30
23
22
20
11
9
10
4
0
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
• Decline in energy consumption per
ton of production from 1310 kwh in
2001-2 to 1202 kwh in 2004-5.
• Use of agro-residues as an alternative
Prudent energy to coal in power generation: from
13 0 0
January 2005 by the Indian Paper
12 8 0
Manufacturers Association for
12 6 0
12 4 0
1233
1202
prudent energy management.
12 2 0
1202
12 0 0 • Rated as the most energy efficient mill
118 0
116 0
by Centre for Science and
114 0
2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5 Environment.
Power consumed per ton
of paper manufactured (kwh) • Highest free energy generation from
by products in the industry.
• Replacement of bank borrowings
for working capital with internal
accruals from Rs 12.6 cr in 2002-3
to Rs 3.6 cr in 2004-5.
40
35
26.81
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2000- 1 2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
capital
management
25 23
20
18
15
15
11
10
0
2001- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
Receivables (days)
• Productivity increased by 24% in 2004-5
in comparison to 2002-03.
• Team working approach comprising 17
quality circles of seven members each
Enhanced across departments, aggregating all
people •
points of view in speedy problem-solving.
productivity
The workmen are involved in several
quality circles and the team has won
awards in regional presentations.
• At 28.06%, among the highest ROCE in
India’s paper industry (2004-5).
Better fiscal
management • A plough back of 44 per cent of the
cash flow in debt repayment.
0 0
2001- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5 2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
2.19 2.47 10
3
2
5
1
0 0
2001- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5 2001- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
Responsible
16 0
14 0
111
12 0
80
69
environment
60
40
20
management 0
2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
160
16 0 149 10 0 0 905.5
139 900
14 0 130
800
12 0 624.5
700
10 0
600
504
80 500
60 400
300
40
200
20
10 0
0
2 0 0 1- 2 2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5 0
2002- 3 2003- 4 2004- 5
Rs 85 cr
capacity from 71,350 TPA to 75,000
TPA.
modernization • Investment in a 5 MW multi-fuel boiler
optimism •
India in these grades.
Industrial grades a strong proxy of the
growing consumer and industry boom
in India.
• Largely compliant with CREP
requirements (2008), so no large capex
foreseen on this account.
• Demonstrated a resistance to industry
cyclicality through a profit increase in
every single year across the last four
years.
Star: points of • Modernisation cum expansion