• Explore instructional approaches, methods and techniques
appropriate for teaching Limited English Proficiency students with special needs (hearing impaired learners). • Contribute to the literacy development goals outlined in the School Improvement Plan by helping students improve their reading skills. • Help promote communication, collaboration and sharing of expertise between ESL teachers and special education teachers who are working with LEP students. Procedures: • Conduct lessons in phonics using Fundations curriculum to kindergarten LEP students in the Hearing Impaired classroom on alternate week days for 30 minutes • Lead a group read-aloud activity with kindergarten LEP students in the Hearing Impaired classroom on alternate week days for 30 minutes. • Meet with special education teachers to discuss their concerns regarding language development of their LEP learners. Seek and share advice from ESL teachers on the strategies to address the needs of these learners. Data Measurement: • Schoolwide mCLASS assessment measuring the development of reading skills in elementary school students • Progress monitoring by the general classroom teacher • Formative assessments by the special education teacher Results
• By the middle of November, the students achieved beginning- of-the year
kindergarden benchmark in reading comprehension. • By the end of November, the students were able to identify all letters and sounds studied during phonics instruction. • Progress monitoring data shows growth by two levels on mCLASS literacy assessment scale.
Text Reading 08/28/17 10/20/17 11/17/17
Comprehension
Student 1 Below print Reading behaviors B
concepts
Student 2 Print concepts Reading behaviors B
Interpretation
The project may have contributed to the overall improvement in the
students’ reading skills for the following reasons:
• the project gave the students additional opportunities to practice the
skills they were being taught as part of their individual education plans and general classroom instruction. It utilized their background knowledge and previously learned strategies. • read-aloud sessions and phonics instruction may be beneficial for learners with diverse ages, backgrounds and special needs • the teachers welcomed an opportunity to communicate their questions and suggestions to their colleagues in a different field. Limitations of the project
• Small number of students
• Students had the same type of disability • Time constraints • Results of the projects (improvement of the students’ reading skills) cannot be attributed to the project alone. • It is hard to evaluate precisely the effectiveness of the project in separation from other literacy activities.
Possible future modifications:
• Include LEP students with a variety of special needs
• Add vocabulary practice to the read-aloud sessions • Diversify spelling activities on the basis of the Fundations program Implications for practice • Reading aloud to children increases their interest in books and motivation to read on their own. • Regular instruction in phonics supports the development of decoding skills and reading fluency. • Collaboration between educators with various areas of expertise leads to new ideas and instructional approaches.
Implications for research
• It is sometimes a challenge to determine whether an LEP student’s academic difficulties are due to his or limited English proficiency or a learning disability. • It is not always easy to evaluate the function and significance of the home language in students who are learning two or more simultaneously. Research could focus on the best way to utilize the students’ knowledge of home language, if it is limited.