0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
19 Ansichten9 Seiten
This document provides an introduction to ways of knowing and discusses how knowledge is obtained. It explains that there are many ways we interact with the physical world and ideas, making it difficult to categorize distinct ways of knowing. While theories of knowledge typically ask us to separate the four ways of knowing (sense perception, language, reasoning, and emotion), this document acknowledges they are not truly separate and encourages readers to remember their interconnection. It then provides steps for students to explore these ways of knowing in small groups through different assigned tasks.
This document provides an introduction to ways of knowing and discusses how knowledge is obtained. It explains that there are many ways we interact with the physical world and ideas, making it difficult to categorize distinct ways of knowing. While theories of knowledge typically ask us to separate the four ways of knowing (sense perception, language, reasoning, and emotion), this document acknowledges they are not truly separate and encourages readers to remember their interconnection. It then provides steps for students to explore these ways of knowing in small groups through different assigned tasks.
This document provides an introduction to ways of knowing and discusses how knowledge is obtained. It explains that there are many ways we interact with the physical world and ideas, making it difficult to categorize distinct ways of knowing. While theories of knowledge typically ask us to separate the four ways of knowing (sense perception, language, reasoning, and emotion), this document acknowledges they are not truly separate and encourages readers to remember their interconnection. It then provides steps for students to explore these ways of knowing in small groups through different assigned tasks.
What do we mean by Ways of Knowing? “The ways of knowing are how we interact with both the physical world and the world of ideas. Of course, there are many ways in which we do this, which is why it is an almost impossible task to come up with distinct categories for how it’s done. And, of course, the four ways of knowing that TOK finally decided on are not separate from each other”. Theories of Knowledge.net Except that …
Usually ToK asks us to
separate each WofK! Step One: Find Your Group Find your group members (others with the same card). You will either be in Sense Perception (yellow), Language (blue), Reasoning (white), or Emotion (pink) Step Two: Divide into three sub-groups: Group #1 (approx 4 people): What are the key points worth knowing about your Way of Knowing? Use any of the provided textbooks or the internet; create a SINGLE powerpoint slide (use bullets) and email it to Mr. Chao (michael.chao@saschina.org). You have 5 minutes! Group #2 (approx 4 people): Look at the packet you received. Which of these sources most clearly ‘fits’ with your WofK and why/how? Your answer must fit on a single powerpoint slide (use bullets) which you can email to Mr. Thiessen(jeffrey.thiessen@saschina.or g). You have 5 minutes! So it’s easy to talk about WofK separately, but luckily …
We then remember to come
back together Group #3 (approx 4 people): Look at the example chosen by sub- group 2 within your WofK. It seems like one where your WofK is key … but youshould also be able to find clear links with other WofK such that it is difficult to separate them. Send your single ppt slide (with bullets) to marney.rosen@saschina.org. You have five minutes! What have we learned about WofK? Now … what’s the connection to AofK … and what the heck is going on with Plato’s ‘The Cave’?!