Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The classification must use core samples obtained from the ground.
This information is often supplemented by in-situ tests such as cone
penetration tests.
Classification based on Particle Size
Particle size is used because it is related to mineralogy
– e.g. very small particles usually contain clay minerals
Broad Classification
Broad Classification
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
W Well graded
Grading curves
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
W Well graded
U Uniform
Grading curves
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
Grading curves
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
C Well graded with some clay
Grading curves
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
C Well graded with some clay
F Well graded with an excess of fines
Simple Classification
In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes
Cla
(%
60
y
es
50
Siz
Siz
50
e s (%
d
60
San
)
Sandy Clay Silty Clay 40
70
30
80 Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
20
90
Silty Sand Sandy Silt 10
100 Sand
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Silt Sizes (%)
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
U. S. ENGINEER DEPT.
Simple Classification
In general soils contain a wide range of particle sizes
Cla
(%
60
y
es
50
Siz
Siz
50
e s (%
d
60
San
)
Sandy Clay Silty Clay 40
70
30
80 Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
20
90
Silty Sand Sandy Silt 10
100 Sand
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Silt Sizes (%)
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
U. S. ENGINEER DEPT.
Note the importance of clay - Finest 20% control behaviour
Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
0
100
10
90
20
80
30
70
40 Clay
)
Cla
(%
60
y
es
50
Siz
Siz
50
e s (%
d
60
Sa n
)
Sandy Clay Silty Clay 40
70
30
80 Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
20
90
Silty Sand Sandy Silt 10
100 Sand
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Silt Sizes (%)
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
0
100
10
90
20
80
30
70
40 Clay
)
Cla
(%
60
y
es
50
Siz
Siz
50
e s (%
d
60
Sa n
)
Sandy Clay Silty Clay 40
70
30
80 Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
20
90
Silty Sand Sandy Silt 10
100 Sand
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Silt Sizes (%)
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
Example: equal amounts sand/silt/clay
0
100
10
90
20
80
30
70
40 Clay
)
Cla
(%
60
y
es
50
Siz
Siz
50
e s (%
d
60
Sa n
)
Sandy Clay Silty Clay 40
70
30
80 Clay-Sand Clay-Silt
20
90
Silty Sand Sandy Silt 10
100 Sand
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Silt Sizes (%)
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION,
Atterberg Limits
Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
Atterberg Limits
Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
Volume
40
30
20
10
0
SL PL LL
0 20 Moisture
40 60
Content (%)
Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation during drying
Atterberg Limits
Particle size is not that useful for fine grained soils
Volume
40
30
20
10
0
SL PL LL
0 20 Moisture
40 60
Content (%)
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
Atterberg Limits
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
mass of water
Moisture content
mass of solids
Atterberg Limits
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
mass of water
Moisture content
mass of solids
Plasticity Index = LL - PL = PI or Ip
Atterberg Limits
SL - Shrinkage Limit
PL - Plastic Limit
LL - Liquid limit
mass of water
Moisture content
mass of solids
Plasticity Index = LL - PL = PI or Ip
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
D60
Cu
D10 x% of the soil has particles
D302 smaller than Dx
Cc
( D60 D10 )
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
D60
Cu
D10 x% of the soil has particles
D302 smaller than Dx
Cc
( D60 D10 )
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
D90 = 3
mm
Unified Soil Classification
To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
D60
Cu
D10
D302
Cc
( D60 D10 )
CH
30
20 OH
CL or
10 CL OL
or MH
ML
0 ML
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
Plasticity chart
Below A-line use
for suffix
laboratoryM - Silt of fine grained soils
classification
CH
30
20 OH
CL or
10 CL OL
or MH
ML
0 ML
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
Plasticity chart
for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
Unified soil classification (including identification and description)
amounts of all intermediate particle sand mixtures, little or no proximate percentages of sand D10
fines)
sizes fines 2
and gravel: maximum size: (D30 )
More than half of coarse
C c = ---------------------
fraction is larger than
missing fines grains: local or geological name Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW
2.36mm
Gravels
Use grain size curve in identifying the fractions as given under field identification
Non-plastic fines (for identification GM Silty gravels, poorly information and symbol in
(apreciable
procedures see ML below) graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures parentheses. Atterberg limits below Above "A" line with
fines
The .075mm sieve size is about the smallest particle visible to the naked eye
Coarse grained soils
Plastic fines (for identification pro- GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded For undisturbed soils add infor- are borderline cases
Atterberg limits above "A" requiring use of dual
(D 30 )2
fraction is smaller than
Example:
Predominantely one size or a range of SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly C c = --------------------- Between 1 and 3
Silty sand, gravelly; about 20% D 10 x D60
sizes with some intermediate sizes missing sands, little or no fines hard angular gravel particles
2.36mm
Sands
12.5mm maximum size; rounded Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW
Non-plastic fines (for identification pro- SM Silty sands, poorly graded and subangular sand grains
(appreciable
Less than 5%
Sands with
cedures, see ML below) sand-silt mixtures coarse to fine, about 15% non- Atterberg limits below Above "A" line with
5% to 12%
fines
plastic lines with low dry "A" line or PI less than 4 PI between 4 and 7
Plastic fines (for identification pro- SC Clayey sands, poorly graded strength; well compacted and are borderline cases
cedures, see CL below) sand-clay mixtures moist in places; alluvial sand; Atterberg limits above "A" requiring use of dual
(SM) line with PI greater than 7 symbols
Identification procedure on fraction smaller than .425mm
sieve size
Dry strength Dilatency Toughness
More than half of material is smaller than
crushing (consistency
less than 50
(reaction
liquid limit
Plasticity index
Slight to Slow Slight Organic silts and organic silt- inent descriptive information, and
medium OL clays of low plasticity symbol in parentheses CH
30 CI
inorganic silts, micaceous or
Silts and clays
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
Example
100
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
80
% Finer
60
40
20
0
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Particle size (mm)
CH
30
20 OH
CL or
10 CL OL
or MH
ML
0 ML
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Liquid limit
Plasticity chart
for laboratory classification of fine grained soils
Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S
Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38
Suffix1 = W
From Atterberg Tests
LL = 32, PL = 26
Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line
Suffix2 = M
Of the coarse fraction about 80% is sand, hence Prefix is S
Cu = 12.5, Cc = 1.38
Suffix1 = W
From Atterberg Tests
LL = 32, PL = 26
Ip = 32 - 26 = 6
From Plasticity Chart point lies below A-line
Suffix2 = M