0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
41 Ansichten10 Seiten
The document summarizes a study that examined the relationship between the number of memes viewed per day and the number of slices of pizza eaten in one sitting. A survey of 25 students collected their daily meme consumption and how many pizza slices they eat. There was a moderate positive correlation of r=0.461, meaning those who view more memes also eat more pizza slices. However, the data was not very valid because the variation explained was only 21.2%. While the results supported the hypothesis of a relationship between memes and pizza, the prediction of slices eaten based on memes viewed daily was not accurate due to the small variation in data.
The document summarizes a study that examined the relationship between the number of memes viewed per day and the number of slices of pizza eaten in one sitting. A survey of 25 students collected their daily meme consumption and how many pizza slices they eat. There was a moderate positive correlation of r=0.461, meaning those who view more memes also eat more pizza slices. However, the data was not very valid because the variation explained was only 21.2%. While the results supported the hypothesis of a relationship between memes and pizza, the prediction of slices eaten based on memes viewed daily was not accurate due to the small variation in data.
The document summarizes a study that examined the relationship between the number of memes viewed per day and the number of slices of pizza eaten in one sitting. A survey of 25 students collected their daily meme consumption and how many pizza slices they eat. There was a moderate positive correlation of r=0.461, meaning those who view more memes also eat more pizza slices. However, the data was not very valid because the variation explained was only 21.2%. While the results supported the hypothesis of a relationship between memes and pizza, the prediction of slices eaten based on memes viewed daily was not accurate due to the small variation in data.
Shaffer-Doan Introduction We interviewed people to see how many memes they viewed per day and how many slices of Big Daddy pizza they can eat. If someone views more memes per day, then they will eat more slices of Big Daddy pizza in one sitting with a positive correlation with a strength of r=0.331 which is a moderate correlation. We did a sample survey, which means we interviewed a sample of the population. Data Set Population is the entire group of people or things being studied. Our population is all people. Sample is the part of the population from which we actually collected data. Our sample was 25 people within the DAHS. Variable is any characteristic of an individual. Our explanatory value is the number of memes viewed daily and our response value is the number of Big Daddy pizza slices eaten in one sitting. We felt that having memes as the explanatory, response would correspond well with the pizza slices consumed as our response. Data Table Memes to Pizza Slices Names Memes Pizza Slices Patrick Kirkwood 54 10
Naomi Webster 30 5 Kylee Bundy 0 6
John Mohney 0 5 Gabby Henrichs 20 4
Jeremy Ayrault 100 14 Haley McAninch 35 8
Ryan Mitskavich 50 10 Madison Donahue 5 7
Andrew Weese 7 9 Alexa Alker 20 5
Kyle Hopson 13 14 Grace Meholick 24 12
Gregg Lines 50 12 Beau Bash 1 10
Isaac Rupert 8 5 Amber Breth 10 3
Bryce Kot 90 18 Dan Grassi 100 15
Dominic DiLullo 24 24 Natalie Dewyer 3 3
Nolan Fairman 50 10 Michaela Tubbs 5 9
Ryan Cupp 7 17 Bethany Zaffuto 12 10
Graph Slide r and r2 Correlation defines the direction and strength of a straight line relationship. Our correlation is r=0.461 which is a positive, moderate correlation. That means as memes viewed increases, then pizza slices eaten increases. Because it has a moderate it makes the data some what valid. Coefficient of determination is the variation in the values of y that is explained by the least squares regression line of y on x. Our r2=0.212, which means that it has a 21.2% variation which means that the data is not valid. Prediction A least square regression line is a line that makes the sum of the squares of the vertical distances as small as possible. y=0.077x+7.576 y=0.077*12+7.576 y=0.924+7.576 y=8.5 r=.461. The variation of the our data was 0.212 which is an 21.2% variation which means that our prediction is not valid because the number is too small. Lurking Variable A lurking variable that has an important effect on the relationship among variables, but is not one of the explanatory variables. How much they like pizza? Is a common response because it only affects the response. How much time they spend on the internet? Is a common response because it only affects the explanatory. Conclusion If someone views more memes per day, then they will eat more slices of Big Daddy pizza in one sitting with a positive correlation with a strength of r=0.461 which is a moderate correlation. Our hypothesis is mostly correct, our correlation is a positive 0.461. Our hypothesis and our results show a moderate correlation in the positive direction. Which is closely related to our prediction. Works Cited Alker, Alexa. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Ayrault, Jeremy. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Bash, Beau. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Breth, Amber. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Bundy, Kylee. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Cupp, Ryan. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Dewyer, Natalie. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. DiLullo, Dom. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Donahue, Madison. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Fairman, Nolan. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Grassi, Dan. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Henrichs, Gabby. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Hopson, Kyle. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Kirkwood, Patrick. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Kot, Bryce. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Lines, Gregg. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. McAninch, Haley. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Meholick, Grace. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Mitskavich, Ryan. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Mohney, John. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Rupert, Isaac. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Tubbs, Michaela. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Webster, Naomi. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Weese, Andrew. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016. Zaffuto, Bethany. Personal interview. 13 Dec. 2016.