Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Dr Harry Newman
Harry.newman@rhul.ac.uk
Structure
• Dramatizing history
Purpose-built
playhouses
• Theatre (1576)
• Curtain (1577)
• Rose (1587)
• Swan (1595)
• Globe (1599)
• Fortune (1600) Cha-ching!
• Hope (1614)
Supply
‘Without the copiousness of narrative material and the broadening of popular literary taste
created by the new communications technology of the printing-press, the London
playhouses might well have been a short-lived enterprise, closed down for lack of profits
long before Marlowe and Shakespeare arrived in the capital in search of a career.’
Martin Wiggins, Shakespeare and the Drama of his Time (OUP, 2000), p. 25
Supply
Key source-texts
for Henry IV, Part 1
• Raphael Holinshed,
The Chronicles of
England, Scotland and
Ireland (1577, 1587)
• John Stow, Chronicles
of England (1580)
• Samuel Daniel, The
Civil Wars (1595) The Holinshed
Project:
http://www.cems.o
x.ac.uk/holinshed/
Demand
Why pay to see a history play? How would it have joyed brave Talbot, the
terror of the French, to think that after he had
lain two hundred years in his tomb, he should
triumph again on the stage, and have his bones
new embalmed with the tears of ten thousand
• History lessons…with a spectators at least (at several times) who in the
tragedian that represents his person imagine
twist they behold him fresh bleeding. … [W]hat a
glorious thing it is to have Henry the Fifth
• Communing with the dead represented on the stage leading the French
king prisoner, and forcing both him and the
• Special effects Dolphin to swear fealty. "Aye, but," will they
say, "what do we get by it?" Respecting neither
• Defining/re-enforcing the right of fame that is due to true nobility
deceased, nor what hopes of eternity are to be
English identity proposed to adventurous minds, to encourage
them forward, but only their execrable lucre
and filthy unquenchable avarice.
Thomas Nashe, Pierce Penniless,
His Supplication to the Devil (1592)
Demand
‘The history play arose at a time when the sense of nationhood was
crystallizing in England as in other European states, part of a
heightened interest in earlier times that took in chronicles, ballads, and
pamphlets as well. Elizabethans looked to events and figures from
those times – not only kings and their battles but country squires, folk
heroes, and common soldiers with their different activities and
perspectives – to anchor the corporate English identity they were
newly defining.’
Susan Snyder, “The genres of Shakespeare’s
plays,” in The Cambridge Companion to
Shakespeare, ed. Margreta de Grazia and
Stanley Wells (CUP, 2001), 91
Popularity
‘… let but Falstaffe come,
Hall [i.e. Hal], Poines, the rest, you scarce shall have roome
All is so pester’d [i.e. crowded]’
Leonard Digges, “Upon Master
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, the
Deceased Author,” Poems (1640)
Kings and clowns: ‘main-plot’ and ‘sub-plot’
The plots
‘MAIN’ PLOT ‘SUB’ PLOT
• King Henry IV • Sir John Falstaff
• Lord John of Lancaster, younger son to King • Poins
• Earl of Westmorland • Bardolph
• Sir Walter Blount • Peto
• Thomas Percy, Earl of Worcester • Hostess/Mistress Quickly
• Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland • Francis, a drawer
(Worcester’s older brother)
• Vintner
• Henry Percy/Hotspur, Northumberland’s son
• Gadshill
• Lady Percy/Kate, Hotspur’s wife
• Chamberlain
• Lord Edward Mortimer, brother to Lady Percy
• Lady Mortimer, daughter to Glendwr, a Welsh
nobleman
• Owain Glendwr, a Welsh nobleman
FALSTAFF ’Sblood, ’twas time to counterfeit, or that hot termagant Scot had
paid me scot and lot too. Counterfeit? I lie, I am no counterfeit. To die is to
be a counterfeit, for he is but the counterfeit of a man who hath not the life
of a man. But to counterfeit dying, when a man thereby liveth, is to be no
counterfeit, but the true and perfect image of life indeed. (5.4.112-118)
KING
thou mak’st me sad and mak’st me sin
In envy that my Lord Northumberland
Should be the father to so blest a son,
A son who is the theme of honour's tongue,
Amongst a grove, the very straightest plant,
Who is sweet Fortune's minion and her pride;
Whilst I, by looking on the praise of him,
See riot and dishonour stain the brow
Of my young Harry. O, that it could be proved
That some night-tripping fairy had exchanged
In cradle-clothes our children where they lay,
And called mine “Percy”, his “Plantagenet”!
Then would I have his Harry, and he mine. (1.1.77-90)
‘What is honour?’
FALSTAFF
HOTSPUR Well, 'tis no matter; honour pricks me on. Yea, but
By heaven, methinks it were an easy leap how if honour prick me off when I come on? How
To pluck bright honour from the pale-faced moon, then? Can honour set to a leg? No. Or an arm?
Or dive into the bottom of the deep, No. Or take away the grief of a wound? No.
Where fathom-line could never touch the ground, Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? No. What is
And pluck up drowned honour by the locks honour? A word. What is in that word “honour”?
What is that “honour”? Air. A trim reckoning. Who
(1.3.200-4) hath it? He that died o'Wednesday. Doth he feel
it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then.
Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the
living? No. Why? Detraction [i.e. slander] will not
suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. (5.1.129-39)