Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1Civil
Engineering Department Tarumanagara University
2Consulting Engineer, Royal HaskoningDHV Indonesia
CONCLUDING LITERATURE
REMARKS STUDY
OUTLINE
2
Urbanization Vertical Assumption
extension Steel to Concrete
space demand
connection
while limited as possible analysis and
green field
option design??
INTRODUCTION
Assumption derives
the modeling and
performance
Reference figures: http://www.steelconstruction.info/Braced_frames 4
SEMI RIGID
ACTION??
Razzaghi &
Khoshbakht
(2012)
Base Plate Connection Design – Fisher & Kloiber (2006)
AISC 341:
*) Amplified Seismic Compressive
Load, o Bending
*) Section Capacities
Tension
Bending
Conservative??
Yes, Gomez et al. (2010)
Bolt Tensile
Fracture
Rotational Stiffness Model of Base Plate (Kavinde et.
al., 2012) Analytical Model
𝑦 = 𝑀𝑦 /𝑦
My = ¼*Fy*tp2
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑟𝑜𝑑 + 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 + 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 + 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
𝜃𝑦 =
𝑁
𝑠+
2
CASE
STUDIES
SDC D
R=6
Variation Joint
Stiffness Cd = 5.0
Model 1 6EI/L
Model 2 1.5EI/L Aviram et.al.
(2010)
Model 3 0.5EI/L 8
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Frame direction X Y X Y X Y
Base plate size 530x490 560x480 530x490 560x480 530x400 560x450
(mm) x40 x40 x40 x40 x35 x40
Anchor rods 4021 4021 2454 2454 1521 1473
(mm2)
Rotational 286 426 252 369 139 206
spring
(MNm/rad)
Shear spring 847 847 338 338 291 202
(MN/m)
Axial Spring 1600 1600 11300 10700 6290 2760
(MN/m)
o = 1.5
9
Axial +
Linear
Link Shear
Modeling
Rotation Non-Linear
10
Dynamic Behaviour
Variation Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
T (s) % T (s) % T (s) %
Rigid 1.2680 70.78 1.2597 71.05 1.0757 77.84
Model 1 1.3001 67.89 1.2893 68.29 1.0907 76.16
Model 2 1.371 62.08 1.3562 62.57 1.1239 72.45
Model 3 1.4673 55.58 1.3753 61.03 1.1665 67.86
dynamic
13
Model 1
Model 3
Model 2
Red : Link X
Blue : Link Y
14
X dir
Y dir
15
Concluding Remarks
• Semi rigid model is more realistic and easier to
detail but it is rather complicated to model
• Overall structural performance with semi rigid
connection falls between IO-LS
• Variation on the connection stiffness influence
the non linear performance only LS
• Connection stiffness of 6EI/L is reasonable for
semi rigid design
• Further study to include time history analysis is
necessary to capture stiffness deterioration
16
17