The CRS pilot project was conducted to Key outcomes of Pilot
evaluate the use of Fabrikam composite railway sleepers in non-traditional market segments Updated feasibility results such as underground mines, trestlework and Marketing plan bridges and areas with environmental sensitivity. Metrics for implementation benefits Updated resource requirements Field Test Results
Pilot Site Static Load Derailment Aging Test Retention Moisture
Test Test Test Test Site 1 1.62 mm 59 mm 94% 6 mm 0.50%
Feasibility Site 2 1.91 mm 42 mm 93% 7 mm 2.50%
Site 3 1.74 mm 46 mm 99% 5 mm 1.75%
Performance of CRS sleepers in pilot Site 4 1.66 mm 57 mm 94% 6 mm 0.50% field tests met or exceeded acceptable ranges in all but one instance. The Site Site 5 1.71 mm 53 mm 96% 6 mm 1.25% 2 static load test variance has been attributed to extreme temperature ranges (below -2° C to above 38 ° C) Test Note 50 tonnes at Groove size Retention of Initial gauge at Degradation of and adjustments have been made. rail seat strength -3 mm material Other sites with similar conditions (3 and 5) demonstrate successful Acceptable 1.58 - 1.88 mm 42 - 60 mm 92 - 98% Up to 7 mm 0.25 - 3.00% performance. Range Generic 1.75 mm 52 mm 91% 6 mm 1.50% Composite Timber 2.31 mm 40 mm 74% 9 mm 3.50%
Concrete 1.59 mm 58 mm 83% 4 mm 2.75%
Materials Comparison Composite Timber ◦ Lightweight construction reduces transportation ◦ Ubiquitous use and handling costs ◦ Minimal upfront costs ◦ Will not rust, rot, splinter or crumble ◦ Concerns with toxicity ◦ Impervious to insects and other pests ◦ Easy to cut and drill Concrete ◦ Superior service life if properly installed and ◦ Excellent sound absorption maintained ◦ High upfront costs ◦ Difficult to remove and cannot be recycled