Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AUTONOMIC AND
METABOLIC
PROBLEMS IN
HIGH LEVEL SCI
FARIDA ARISANTI,dr., SpKFR.
Autonomic dysfunctions are
common consequences of spinal
cord injury
Spinal cord injury disrupts -the
descending spinal voluntary
sensory, motor and involuntary
autonomic pathways
dysfunctions of the
cardiovascular system, motor
system, bladder, bowel and
Summary
sexual organs. Summary tagline or
sub-headline
cord injury
• Patients have higher morbidity
and mortality as a result of the
autonomic dysfunction.
Kathleen C. Rankin, Laura C. O’Brien, Liron Segal,, M. Rehan Khan, and Ashraf S.
Gorgey. Liver Adiposity and Metabolic Profile in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord
Injury. Hindawi BioMed Research International. 2017
Volume 2017,
• Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a
leading cause of death in persons
with spinal cord injury (SCI) who
survive at least 1 year post injury
• Persons with SCI who are younger
than 45 years of age are 4 times
more likely to die of cardiac causes
than their age-matched
counterparts without SCI
One of the significant risks of CVD
in persons with SCI is their
tendency to develop
cardiometabolic syndrome
as a cluster of risk factors that
includes obesity, insulin resistance,
diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia,
and subclinical atherosclerosis.
Schladen & Groah. State of the Science on Cardiometabolic Risk After Spinal Cord
Injury: Recap of the 2013 ASIA Pre-Conference on Cardiometabolic Disease. Top Spinal
Cord Inj Rehabil 2014;20(2):105–112
Neurogenic shock, which often marked bradycardia, HR < 45bpm
occurs simultaneously with common (71%) in individuals with
spinal shock is clinically severe cervical SCI duringthe acute
recognized by recovery period following injury
bradyarrhythmias, (Lehmann et al.,1987)
atrioventricular conduction
block and hypotension which
reflect ANS dysfunction
• significant hypotension (i.e.,
systolic BP (SBP) <90mmHg)
severe cervical lesions during
the initial period post-SCI, half
of whom required vasopressive
• persistent bradycardia < 60
bpm was reported to be
universal (100%)
• Neurogenic shock is mostoften
defined as a SBP of ≤100mmHg
and HR ≤ 80 bpm, although
other definitions have been
proposed (Mallek et al.,2012)
• Incidence : 25% in newly injured
individuals with cervicallesions,
longer Intensive Care Unit Neurogenic
and hospital stays (Mallek et al.,
2012) shock
• >> cervical and high thoracic
Could significantly affect clinical management
lesions poorer outcomes of individuals with acute SCI delay in the
(Piepmeier et al., 1985) timing of surgical intervention and surgical
decompression in patients with acute cervical
SCI (Tuli et al., 2007).
• The incidence of bradycardia
(HR 55 bpm) in complete
cervical lesions (69%)compared
to those with incomplete
cervical lesions (31%)
(Piepmeier et al., 1985).
• The need for cardiovascular
intervention was significantly
increased in those with C1-5
compared to those withC6-8
lesions (Bilello et al.,2003)
• 20% of individuals with
complete cervical lesions
required additional vasopressor
support
• Obvious picture of
flaccid paralysis and
areflexia spinal
shock (disturbances
within the motor
and sensory nervous
systems) (Atkinson
and Atkinson, 1996;
Nacimiento and
Noth, 1999; Ditunno Spinal shock in humans usually last fr
et al., 2004)
F. Biering-Sørensen et al. / Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 209 (2018) 4–18
usually lastfrom a few days to a
few weeks post-injury (4 to 6
weeks) reflex activity below
the level of injury may be
detectable
The end of spinal shock
recovery of the
bulbocavernosus reflex (the first
few days injury)
Alternatively recovery of deep
tendon reflexes within 2-weeks of
injury or recovery of bladder
F. Biering-Sørensen et al. / Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 209 (2018) 4–18
reflexes within 2 months of injury
CARDIAC
DYSRHYTHMIAS
Savage et al. Neurogenic Fever after Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Global Spine Journal Vol. 6 No. 6/2016
METABOLIC PROBLEMS IN SCI
K. Wahman et al. Car diovas ular Disease Risk and the Need for Prevention after Paraplegia Determined by Conventional Multifactorial Risk Models: The Stockholm Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 237–242
EXERCISE!!!
Thank You
FARIDA ARISANTI
022-2034989
farida.arisanti@unpad.ac.id
www.ikfrbandung.com
page 31
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN SCI