Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
3
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
1 2
3 5
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
IF LOVE.... PEACE...
6
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
7
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
The COMPETITION
The JURISTS
1. Ai Weiwei (artist and human rights activist)
2. Angelina Acheng Atyam (winner of the United Nations Human Rights Award)
3. Jimmy Carter (Nobel Peace Prize laureate)
4. Aung San Suu Kyi (Nobel Peace Prize laureate)
5. Waris Dirie (model and human rights activist)
6. Shirin Edabi (Nobel Peace Prize laureate)
7. Roland Emmerich (film director and producer)
8. Guillermo Fariñas (human rights activist)
9. Carolyn Gomes (human rights activist)
10. Michail Gorbachev (Nobel Peace Prize laureate)
11. Mukhtar Mai (human rights activist)
12. Somaly Mam (human rights activist)
13. Juanes (singer and peace activist)
14. Navanethem Pillay (UN High Commissioner for Human Rights)
15. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu (winner ,2010 Citizens Peace Award , Sri Lanka)
16. Jimmy Wales (co-founder of Wikipedia)
17. George Yong-Boon Yeo (former Singaporean Minister for Foreign Affairs)
18. Muhammad Yunus (Nobel Peace Prize laureate)
9
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
The ENTRIES
• symbolic power
• distinctiveness
• clarity
• universal applicability
On September 23 , 2011....
11
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
FREE AS A MAN 12
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
FREE AS A MAN 13
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HR SYMBOL
“One logo can’t change the world, including this one. But this logo
is a symbol which could gather people – and people can change
the world” – PEDRAG STAKIC, Serbian Designer 14
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
15
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
WORLD BANNERS
# Human rights violations be like….
RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY 17
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
18
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
Right to Vote 19
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
What is DEMOCRACY?
24
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
What is DEMOCRACY?
What is DEMOCRACY?
26
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
Facts:
Laceda admitted having served as Punong Barangay of
Panlayaan for three consecutive terms. However, he asserted that when
he was elected for his first two terms, Sorsogon was still a municipality, and
that when he served his third term, the Municipality of Sorsogon had
already been merged with the Municipality of Bacon to form a new
political unit, the City of Sorsogon, pursuant to Republic Act No. 8806.
Issue:
WON Laceda is qualified to run for re-election as Punong
Barangay of Panlayaan for the fourth time.
Held: NO. Republic Act No. 8806 creating Sorsogon City did
not change the character of Barangay Panlayaan. RA 8806
did not interrupt Laceda’s term. 27
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
28
ARTICEL 21, UDHR –RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY
1st District 2nd District 3rd District (3rd) 4th District 5th District
1. Del Gallego 1. Libmanan 1. Naga City 1. Caramoan 1. Iriga City
2. Ragay 2. Minalabac 2. Pili 2. Garchitorena 2. Baao
3. Lupi 3. Pamplona 3. Ocampo 3. Goa 3. Balatan
4. Sipicot 4. Pasacao 4. Camaligan 4. Lagonoy 4. Bato
5. Cabusao 5. San Fernando 5. Canaman 5. Presentacion 5. Buhi
6. Gainza 6. Magarao 6. Sangay 6. Bula
7. Milaor 7. Bombon 7. San Jose 7. Nabua
RA 9716 Era 8. Calabanga; 8. Tigaon
9. Tinamba
10. Siruma
Held: Republic Act No. 9716 does not alter the fact that the
renamed district which elected him for the third time (2010) is the
29
same one which brought him to office in 2004 and 2007.
30
Supporting Slides
31
As such, we hold that moral disapproval, without more, is not a sufficient governmental
interest to justify exclusion of homosexuals from participation in the party-list system.
The denial of Ang Ladlad’s registration on purely moral grounds amounts more to a
statement of dislike and disapproval of homosexuals, rather than a tool to further any
substantial public interest.
32
Q — Give examples of soft law.
ANS: Certain declarations and resolutions of the UN General Assembly fall under
this category. (Louis Henkins, et al., International Law, Cases and Materials,
2nd Ed.). The UN Declaration of Human Rights is an example. This was applied
in Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region v. Olalia; Mejoff v.
Director of Prisons; 90 Phil. 70 (1951); Mijares v. Ranada; Shangri-la International
Hotel Management Ltd. v. Developers Group of Companies Inc.,G.R. No. 159938,
March 31, 2006, 486 SCRA 405).
33
The Doctrine of Incorporation; The Doctrine of Transformation.
The doctrine of incorporation means that the rules of international law for part
of the law of the land and no legislative action is required to make them
applicable to a country. The Philippines follows his doctrine, because Section
2,Article II of the Constitution states that the Philippines adopt the generally
accepted principles of international law as partof the law of the land.
34
The Doctrine of Incorporation; The Doctrine of Transformation.
The doctrine of incorporation means that the rules of international law for part
of the law of the land and no legislative action is required to make them
applicable to a country. The Philippines follows his doctrine, because Section
2,Article II of the Constitution states that the Philippines adopt the generally
accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land.
35