Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Author :
*1) Muhammad Alkadri, 2) Ilapadila, 3) Dewi Rahma Ahmadi, 4) Hena Suri Intan,
5) Syamsuddin
Presenter Biography
• Hasanuddin University
Introduction
Methodology
Conclusion
Introduction
This research has done in Tukamasea Village around
Main
Objective
Karst Maros unit
Karst unit spread widely in central and northeast at Maros regency. Karst unit in
Maros and Pangkep have overall area 43.750 hectares. But, around 23.750 hectares
including Bantimurung Bulusaraung National Park area. While, 20.000 hectares
including mining area. Karst’s height approximately 500 meters above sea level.
Aquifer Types
1. Unconfined Aquifer
2. Confined Aquifer
Figure 4. Geological research map (Modified by Pertiwi, 2017 from Rab Sukamto
and Supriyatna, 1982)
2. Geometry factor of
configuration is shown in 4. Wenner – Schlumberger method
Figure 4. is also able to cover Wenner
configuration weakness such as bad
horizontal coverage, although its
not better than Dipole – dipole
configuration
Research Procedure
The following are measurement steps in research area consisted of 3 line with 470 meter length each line and
using 10 meters intervals :
Line 1
Line 2
Line 3
Line 1
Aquifer zone
Aquifer zone
Line 2 2D imaging located in Tonasa formation. Resistivity range around about 30 - 63 Ωm in 12th –
23rd electrode interpreted as a weak zone represented by light blue. While, in 30th-33rd electrode
with 20 meters depth interpreted aquifer known as unconfined aquifer have resistivity range about
Discussion 10 – 60.8 Ωm as same as resistivity value previous layer in 38th-47th electrode with 10 meters depth
known as unconfined aquifer too. Another interpretation, in 34th -36th electrodes cross-section it
also clearly shows that such a high resistivity range about to 4251 Ωm identified as a basalt
intrusion is supposedly supported by basalt outcrops on the surface.
Line 3
Aquifer zone
Line 3 cross section located in Tonasa formation. Resistivity value around line 3 about 132-277 Ωm
interpreted known as sandy-limestone shown as light green – dark green. While, resistivity range
about 8.02 - 80.2 Ωm with 20 meters depth. 8th and 15th electrodes interpreted known as
Discussion
unconfined aquifer represented by light blue supposedly supported by existing lake in northeast
side. In other, bellow layer identified as alluvium was correlated with regional geological have
resistivity range about 60.3 - 99 Ωm in ± 70 meters depth.
Conclusion
Based on our interpretation, we conclude that :
[1] Hendrajaya, L., dan Arif. I., 1990. Resistivity Geoelectricity Method. ITB : Bandung.
[2] Lantu. 2015. Geoelectricity and Geoelectromagnet Method. Geophysic Program Study FMIPA. University of Hasanuddin :
Makassar
[3] Oni, T.E., G.O. Omosuyi., A.A. Akinlalu. 2017. Jurnal : Groundwater vulnerability assessment using hydrogeologic and
geoelectric layer susceptibility indexing at Igbara Oke, Southwestern Nigeria. Nigeria: Department of Applied Geophysics,
Federal University of Technology, Akure.
[4] Pertiwi, Hena Suri Intan. 2017. Geophysic Thesis. Studi Bawah Permukaan Untuk Identifikasi Sebaran Batuan Intrusi
Menggunakan Metode Geolistrik Resistivitas Konfigurasi Wenner Schlumberger(Studi Kasus : Karst Maros Sulawesi Selatan).
University of Hasanuddin. Makassar, Indonesia
[5] Hermawan, Richard, Putra, Prakasa. 2016. Journal of Applied Geology. The Effectiveness of Wenner-Schlumberger and
Dipole-dipole Array of 2D Geoelectrical Survey to Detect The Occurring of Groundwater in the Gunung Kidul Karst Aquifer
System, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University. Yogyakarta.
[6] Loke, M.H. 2001. Electrical Imaging Surveys for Environmental and Engineering Studies : A Practical Guide to 2D & 3D
Surveys.
Handshaking Slides
Sample text
Thank you This is a sample text.
Insert your desired text
here.
Sample text
This is a sample text.
Insert your desired text
here.