Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Edi Wibowo
1st reported by Papanicollaou and Marshall (1945)
Bladder Retrograde
washing or catheterization Direct Brushing
barbotage of ureters
Koss LG, Hoda RS. 2012. Chapter 2 Indication, Collection, and Laboratory Processing of Cytologic
Samples. Koss’s Cytology of the Urinary Tract with Histopathologic Correlations. Springer.7-
16.
Reporting Systems by G. Papanicolaou
• Class 1- Absence of abnormal or atypical cells
• Class 2- Atypical cells present but without abnormal
features
• Class 3- Cells with abnormal features but not
sufficiently pathognomonic
• Class 4- Fair number of pathognomonic cells and
cell clusters
• Class 5- Large number of conclusive cells and cell
clusters
Bhat A, Manjunath J, Manjunath S. Urine Cytology a Review. Annals of Applied Bio-Sciences .
2016.3(1):6-10.
• The positive predictive value was 94.8% for positive
cytology (Class 4 or 5)
• 47.4% for suspicious cytology (Class 3)
• 7.4% for negative cytology (Class 1 or 2)