Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
• Superstructur
e
Interaction
Means/forces of
Relation of production
production
(physical +
knowledge +
mode of
cooperation)
Class – the relation of immediate transfer of surplus value. This relation
obtains between head laborer and the capitalist, the capitalist and the
landlord. The transfer of surplus from below and the exercise of power
from above .
Class in itself- Marx suggests that the english working class ‘already a class
against capital but not yet for itself’.
Class interest- imputed goal and not what this or that proletariat thinks
Trade unionism-it only increases wages but keep alive labor. The struggle
for economic benefits may change the workers so that they go beyond the
economic struggle and into politics. This is relation between human
agency and circumstances.
Falling rate of profit- as more surplus is gathered it is invested in
constant capital (machinery) that reduces the need for labor (principal
source of profit) making more unemployment, reducing demand. It also
produces only for exchange that is a source of problem.
• Class struggle- as capitalism develops great
masses of workers are herded together in close
proximity and this develops class consciousness.
This means community feeling, political
organization. The workers will first solve the
problem nationally and then internationally
because the zinith of capitalism happens
internationally and communism can happen only
world historically because we have to abolish the
law of supply and demand.
• Dictatorship of the proletraiat –
• Communism-
• Talcott parsons
• Modes of orientation (1) motivational – cognitive (information),
cathectic (emotion), evaluative (aesthetic) (2) value- cognitive,
appreciative, moral
• Institutionalization
• Self- collective
• Affectivity- affective neutrality (emotional)
• Universalism- particularism (interaction as per
individual characteristics)
• Diffuse- specificity (discussion from study to personal
matters)
• Achievement- ascription (interaction influenced by
individual characteristics)
• Functional imperatives (applicable to
subsystem as well as system )
• Adaptation- with the environment to survive-
economic
• Goal attainment- the political system
• Latency (pattern maintainance)- the cultural
system (through the process of socialization)
• Integration- within the subsystems
• Merton
• Definition of function
• Postulates of unity, universality and
indespensibility
• Manifest and latent function
Conflict perspective
• Simmel
• Roussau- man born free, but everywhere he is in chains
• A house cant be built of houses but bricks
• Individual egoism vs self perfection as objective values
• Society creates an ‘average’ of individual
• Society claims the individual for itself
• From concrete man to general man- Society requires the individual to
differentiate himself from the humanly general but forbids him to stand out
from the socially general.
• The antinomy of freedom and equality can be resolved only if both are
dragged down to the negative level of propertylesness and powerlessness.
• Liberty, equality, fraternity
• The very feeling of oppressiveness of authority suggests that the autonomy of
the subordinate party is actually presupposed and never wholly eliminated.
Oppression is a situation where one is not willing to pay the price of freedom.
• Intrinsic relation of Leader and led- do the politicians lead the mass or follow
the mass?
• Ralf dahrendorf
•
• Legal Ownership and factual control of property – the separation in
the present day
• Private property and effective private property (means of production)
• “the fundamental inequality of social structure and the lasting
determinants of social conflict is the inequality of power and
authority which inevitably accompanies social organization”.
• By strict marx standard authority becomes part of superstructure
and not much important
• Property is exclusion of others over the object thus implying
authority
• “ classes are social conflict groups the determinant of which can be
found in the inclusion or exclusion from the exercise of authority in
an imperatively coordinated association”.
• Social roles endowed with expectation of domination and subjection.
Domination in one does not mean domination in all
• Imperatively coordinated association – differential
distribution of authority
• Behind authority interest and therefore maintain existing
authority structure
• When individuals are aware of their interests they are
interest groups and individuals with similar latent interests-
quasi groups
• 3 conditions for quasi groups to become interest groups-
(1)social-close location (2) technical- organization and
leadership (3) political- the system should allow to organize
• Intensity- superimposition (when different spheres-political,
economic, social- superimpose each other) vs pluralism
• Intra-generational mobility reduces intensity
• Very sudden structural change vs less sudden (how much
personnel in authority are changed)
• Lewis coser
• Cause
• Subordinates question the legitimacy. This depends on
segmentation of peoples’ emotional energies, grievance
redressal mechanisms, mobility avenue
• Relative deprivation creates more conflict than absolute
deprivation. It depends on how much external constraint is
imposed.
• Violence
• Realistic issues – less violent
• core values- more violent
• if the non-realistic just goes on it will become realistic
• functional interdependence is a function of power
differential and isolation of population
• Duration
• magnitude of goals
• clarity about goal
• clarity about symbolic victory and defeat
• interpretation about the cost of conflict – power differential, clear
index of victory/defeat
• leaders’ capacity to persuade followers – centralization, internal
cleavage
• Functions for the respective parties
• demarcation of boundaries
• centralization of authority
• ideological solidarity
• suppression of dissent
• Functions for the whole
• more functional interdependence- more number of less violent
conflicts- more contributes to innovation and flexibility of the
system
• historically unless the conflict is violent nobody bothers
• Randal Collins
• Organizational control can happen in three ways- material,
coercive, symbolic
• The powerful define the norm to suit their interest and
that’s why that will be source of conflict
• Organizational control can happen in three ways- material
(reward), coercive (violence), symbolic (normative)
• Only people in leadership position can be driven by
normative control. Rest have to be by coercion and material
reward.
• Higher ups give subordinate ‘a piece of action’
Sociology as a form of
Consciousness
Society: a large complex of
human relationships...a
system of interaction
Social: a quality of
interaction, interrelatedness,
mutuality
Society is a complex of social
events, “Social Situations”
Sociology as a form of
Suspicion
• About: the ways in which human
events are officially interpreted by
the authorities
• Also, a form of questioning self-
conceptions
• Thus, it is: seeing through, looking
behind the apparent , and above all ,
an art of MISTRUST
Social Problem
• Public: when something does not work
the way it is supposed to according to
official interpretations: crime, divorce,
workers efficiency
• Sociology: How the whole system works;
by what it means it is held together? So,
social problem is: not crime, but LAW; not
divorce, but MARRIAGE; not racial/caste
discrimination but RACIALLY DEFINED
STRATIFICATION SYSTEM
Sociological Perspectives:
Man/woman in Society
• Is Society a prison?
• What is to be LOCATED IN SOCIETY?
• Social location of self: what an individual
may or may not do; What he/she expect
from life; in other words, taken for granted
meanings, (and its politics)
• Mechanisms of Social Control: Violence,
Economic pressure, mental pressures,
morality, customs and manners; formal
and informal “code of Conduct”, family
and friends, (celebrating family)
To be located in society
• Social stratification: Class, Caste, Gender
• objective criteria and forms of
consciousness
• Definition of the situation: Reality is a
matter of definition; but, how do we define
things? Past experiences?
• Institutions: (structured ‘dos’ ) relates
to individuals as A REGULATORY
AGENCY
Sociological Perspectives:
Society in Man/woman
• Society provides us our identities:
Social location of our being, our
conduct and our expectations
• Role theory: identity is socially
bestowed , sustained and
transformed ( process of
Socialization) is this a political
process?
Sociological Perspectives
• Now, do we have any choice at all? (from
these social constitutions) Are we just
puppets, directed by others? Or do we
have any freedom from external (imposed)
constitution of our selves?
• Or are we AGENTS IN CONDITIONS?
• Paradox of our social existence: “society
defines us, but is in turn defined by us”
Agency and structures
• Is freedom our necessary condition? (are we
condemed to be free, (Sartre),
• Is the option of freedom in conditions a kind
of AGONY OF CHOICE?
• Bad faith: the wish NOT to FACE Freedom
• Sociological ecstasy: act of stepping outside
caves, alone, to face the darkness
What are social
institutions?
Social Institutions
• Social Institutions
• Social institutions are established or
standardized patterns of rule-
governed behavior. They include the
family, education, religion, and
economic and political institutions.
Major perspectives
Marx
• Social institutions are determined by their society’s mode
of production.
• Social institutions serve to maintain the power of the
dominant class.
Weber
• Social institutions are interdependent but no single
institution determines the rest.
• The causes and consequences of social institutions
cannot be assumed in advance.
Durkheim
• Set the stage for later functionalist analyses of
institutions by concluding that religion promotes social
solidarity and collective conscience.
Theoretical Perspective
• Functionalist theory
• The social institutions listed in this section (along
with other social institutions) fulfill functional
prerequisites and are essential.
• Conflict theory
• Social institutions tend to reinforce inequalities
and uphold the power of dominant groups.
• Emphasizes divisions and conflicts within social
institutions.
• Symbolic interactionism
• Focuses on interactions and other symbolic
communications within social institutions.
Family
Family:
• A socially defined set of relationships between at least
two people related by birth, marriage, adoption, or, in
some definitions, long-standing ties of intimacy.
• Key Questions: How do families vary across different
societies, historical periods, classes, and ethnic groups?
• How are authority, resources, and work distributed
within families?
• How do parents, particularly mothers, balance the
demands of work and family?
• What are the causes and effects of divorce, domestic
violence, and single parenting?
Competing views
• Marx: The family upholds the capitalist
economic order by ensuring the reproduction of
the working class and by maintaining
housewives as a reserve labor force.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of the family
include socializing children, regulating sexual
behavior and reproduction, distributing
resources, providing social support.
Education
• A formal process in which knowledge, skills, and
values are systematically transmitted from one
individual or group to another.
• Key Questions: How do educational practices vary
across different societies and historical periods?
• How does education affect individuals’ subsequent
activities and achievements?
• What are the effects of class, race, and gender on
educational institutions and experiences?
• What are the causes and consequences of various
trends in education, such as grade inflation, violence
in schools, and increasing public funding of religious
instruction?
Marx, Functionalist, Conflict,
SI
• Marx: Education serves the capitalist order by producing
skilled workers with habits such as punctuality and
respect for authority.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of education include
transmitting shared values and beliefs, transmitting
specific knowledge and skills, sorting individuals based
on skill, and establishing social control over youths.
• Conflict theory: Educational tracking systems and other
differential treatment of students reinforce social
inequalities.
• Symbolic interactionism: Face-to-face interactions in
the classroom can have long-range consequences for
students’ educational achievements.
Religion
• Religion:
• A unified system of beliefs and practices pertaining to the
supernatural and to norms about the right way to live that is
shared by a group of believers. Sociologists treat religion as a
social rather than supernatural phenomenon.
• Key Questions: How do the world religions differ? How are
they similar?
• How have religions developed and changed, and why do
people engage with them?
• What is the relationship between religion and other aspects
of social life such as stratification, deviance, and conflict?
• What are the causes and consequences of contemporary
trends such as secularization, the splintering of religious
groups, and shifting church–state relationships?
Opium, spiritualism,
functions…..
• Marx: Religion is the “opium of the people”—it masks domination
and diverts workers from rebelling against exploitation.
• Weber: Classified religions by their approach to salvation:
– Ascetic religions require active self-mastery; mystical religions
require passive contemplation.
– Other-worldly religions require focus on the next life (e.g., heaven);
this-worldly religions require focus on earthly life.
• Durkheim: Religion provides social solidarity and collective
conscience; it expresses and celebrates the force of society over
the individual.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of religion include providing
meaning for life, reinforcing social norms, strengthening social
bonds, and marking status changes (e.g., marriage).Dysfunctions,
according to some, include justifying persecution.
Economic Institutions
• Sociologists understand the economy as the set of
arrangements by which a society produces, distributes, and
consumes goods, services, and other resources.
• Key Questions: What institutions and relations characterize
different economic systems (e.g., capitalism, socialism, and
feudalism)?
• How do consumption and leisure patterns differ among
various cultures, historical periods, and social groups?
• How do the structures of business organizations affect
productivity, job satisfaction, and inequalities?
• What are the causes and consequences of contemporary
trends such as economic liberalization, declining unionization,
and increased consumer debt?
Marx/Functionalism
• Marx: Economic organization (the means
and relations of production) determines the
major features of any society.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of
economic institutions include: production
and distribution of goods, assignment of
individuals to different social roles such as
occupations.
Political Institutions
• Political Institutions:
• Institutions that pertain to the
governance of a society, its formal
distribution of authority, its use of
force, and its relationships to other
societies and political units. The state,
an important political institution in
modern societies, is the apparatus of
governance over a particular territory.
Key questions
• Key Questions: How do political institutions differ
across historical periods and societies?
• How do different social groups participate in political
institutions, and with what consequences?
• How and why do individuals participate in political
processes such as voting or joining lobbying groups?
• How are political institutions related to other aspects
of society, such as the economy and the mass
media?
Authority/Functions/Democr
acy
• Weber: Defines the state as an authority that maintains
a monopoly on the use of violence in its territory.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of political institutions
include protection from external enemies, resolving
group conflicts, defining societal goals, and
strengthening group identity and norms. Pluralism, a
particularly functional type of political institution, entails
distribution of power among many groups so no one
group can gain control.
• Conflict theory: Pluralism and democracy are illusions
that invite the powerless to believe that they have a
voice in governance, when in fact their control is quite
limited.
Marriage
• Marriage is a universal feature of human societies
• It confers on men and women or of same sex ‘social
legitimation’ to engage in sexual relations,
reproduction (not necessary) and child rearing
• To a large extent marriage is not a matter of free
choice, it is socially derived and socially sanctioned
(Khap panchayats, kinship pressures, parent’s choice,
social choice etc)
• Every known society places certain limitations on the
range of persons from among whom spouses may be
chosen. Two major rules of marriage present in
almost all societies are: exogamy and endogamy
Exogamy (Exit)
• This is a social prescription that
requires an individual to marry
outside a specific culturally defined
social groups of which he/she is a
member. This practice serves to
enhance and improve sociability
among people by connecting groups
of people.
Endogamy
• Family • Property
• Lineage • Work
• Clan • Kinship relations
• Caste • Marriage
• Status
• Gender relations
• Caste
– Kinship linkages provided by marriage give its
strength
– Breach in linkages brings down the status
• Of family
• Clan
• Caste
– Female sexuality
• Caste purity
• Tradition, culture and honour
• Power
– Caste, class, gender or seniority
– Violence
Cultural codes
• Honour –
– Izzat
– At the expense of human sentiments and
values
– Love and kinship bonds sacrificed for morality
and upkeep of honour
– Ideology
– Guides the social behaviour
• Complicity
– Between perpetrators of violence and police
Challenges to cultural codes
Within Without
• Assertion of the • Assertion of lower
younger members caste groups
Linkages between the Honour of the upper
two - caste
denial of honour to the
lower caste
Intra-caste
• month later in April 1991, in village Khedakul of Narela (north Delhi),
Poonam, a jat girl, was shot dead by her uncle in broad day light for having
an 'illicit relationship' with another jat boy of the same village.4 Again,
several villagers were witness to this crime. The father and the uncle
declared it a "heinous crime". and death as its only punishment. "Her action
had soiled our honour, our pride," the father reportedly told the police.In
August 1993, in village Khandravali in Muzzafarnagar district, western UP,
a low caste girl Sarita, having made a runaway match, was axed to death
along with her husband Satish. Satish belonged to her own caste group but
hailed from an adjacent sister village6 and was also very distantly related
to her. The families of both the victims were bricklayers. It was at a brick
kiln in Haryana that they grew intimate and finally eloped. All attempts to
trace them failed. However when they allegedly returned, on their own
volition five months after the elopement, they were beheaded in the village
chaupal by the girl's uncle. Their "'grave social violation" was compounded
by their returning to the village, where according to the local opinion, they
"dared to flaunt" their "disdain for the social norms". The crime was
witnessed by the whole village. This was the third elopement in the village
among its low caste community. Nothing is known of the other couples. The
village elders were concerned about protecting the 'izzat' (honour) of the
village. This brutal hacking was to be a "lesson to others", said Om Pal, the
sarpanch (headman) of the village. In this episode the girl was blamed by
the villagers for "luring" the youth. The grandmother of Sarita openly
declared: "Our name is mud. Can I look anyone in the eye now".
Inter-caste
• “…Perhaps the most shocking of the lot is
the Mehrana murder case of March 1991.
Roshni, a jat girl of village Mehrana in
western UP, ran away with Brijendra, a low
caste jatav boy, assisted by his friend. All
the three were caught. The jat panchayat
sat in judgment on them. Under its decree,
they were tortured the whole night, hanged
in the morning and then set on fire, two of
them still alive. The entire village was
witness to this savage and brutal murder.”
Incest taboos
• Got exogamy
• Village exogamy
• Marriage
– The above rejection
– Related to the importance of establishing
inter-group relationship
• Use of violence
• Social networks
– Structures of support and betrayal
Status concerns
• Relaxation of restrictions in principles
of village exogamy and clan exogamy
• Cases
– 1993 – village Pehtavas, district Bhiwani
– Sangwan and Punia got
– 1995 – village Salani, Rohtak district
– Bairagi and Chahar got
• November 1993, in village Pehtavas, district Bhiwani, confrontation and
violence among jats occurred on account of infringement of certain clan
taboos. The two groups of jats involved in the marriage belonged to the Punia
and the Sangwan got. Bakhtawar Singh Punia got his two sons married into
the Sangwan got of jats. A 'khap' panchayat (multi-clan council) of 40 villages
met on March 14 and held the alliance as incestuous; it decreed the marriage
void. When Bakhtawar Singh Punia refused to accept the verdict a social
boycott of the family was ordered. Normally, the Sangwans and the Punias
can and do inter- marry. But because of a tradition, unique to the village, a
marital alliance between them was considered 'sinful'. In 1850s, the first
important settler of the village, Chaudhary Chet Ram of the Sangwan got had
adopted Dhod Ram Punia as his son. The Punia sub-caste thus merged with
the Sangwans. The two clans from then onwards became adopted brother got.
However the alliance began as an alliance between a bigger, more powerful
and higher status brother and a younger, weaker brother. Over the years
some of the families of Punias migrated to the city, gave up farming, took up
urban professions and became urban based. Bakhtawar Singh Punia was one
such man. He joined government service as a police inspector. His sons
Mahender and Rajesh both grew up to take urban professions. Living in the
urban centres made Bakhtawar's family escape the direct ire of
Inter-caste marriages
• Short-lived and impermanent
• Dissimilarity of culture
• Problems of identity for future
generations
• Purity of blood
Upper caste women and lower
caste men
• Folk songs
– Celebrate liaison between upper caste
women and lower caste men
• Social and economic betterment of the
lower castes
– Jatavs and other lower castes becoming
socially and economically more powerful
– Jats show a new determination who have
become rich through green revolution
Lower caste women
• High caste women
– Considered vulnerable to low caste men
• Lower caste women
– Do not have purity
– “vo to hoven he aise hain, mahare
ladakon ka ke kasur”
– There women are sexually promiscuous.
What is the fault of our boys?
Traditions of inter-caste
marriages
• Jat ek samundar hai aur jo bhi daruya es
samunder mein parti hai who samunder ki
bun jati hai
• Beeran ki kai jaat – women have no caste
• Karewa marriages with inter-caste alliances
• British rule and invocation of Hindu law
Assertion of power
• Caste Panchayats
– “the panchayat walas stepped in….they said to
me that ladkiwalas did not have a say in the
matter and that they alone would decide what
punishment was to be meted out to the girl.
They took her away and hanged her”
• Growing urbanization of Haryana
– But rural urban divide not as tight, massive
overlap
– Daily commuting to Delihi – 1 lakh Haryanvis
– Urban consumerist culture
– Jeep and a gun and a bottle of rum – virile
martial race
Brahmans vs. non-
Brahmans
• Kumbapettai, in Tanjore region of
Tamil Nadu – Kathleen Gough (1956)
• Brahmans
• Shudras
• Adi Dravidas
Brahman vs. non-Brahman
• Occupation
• Moral values
Brahmans
• Households
– 36
• 30 – 3- 30 acres of land
• 6- do not hwon land
• Management of land
– Non-Brahmans
• Cowherds, peasants, potters, fishermen, washermen
– Adi-Dravidas
• Pallans
• Brahman street – agraharam
Subcaste, clan and lineage
• Clan
– Five clans – descended from five sages
– Kuttam
– Patrilineage
– Exogamy, clan deity
– Unity seen in performance of rituals
Dwelling group
• Patrilineal, patrilocal and extended
family with a joint ownership of land
– 36
• 7 – complete joint families
• 8 – incomplete
• 13 – nuclear families with married couples
• 8 – widows, with our without children
Relations in elementary
family
• Parents and sons
– Son treated with indulgence
– Asymmetrical relation between
• Father and son
• Brothers
• In contrast with low caste mutual equality
• Partial repudiation of emotional ties with
women
• Sexual relations – valued only for begetting
a son
• Girl – non-person until married
– Gift of a virgin
Brahman vs. Non-Brahman
• Relationship to land
• Economic independence of low caste
women
• Equality and solidarity of peers
• Religious values
• Economic arrangements
• Sensuality and aggression
• Asymmetry in the kinship system
Transitory residents,
invisible workers
Residence
• Residence after marriage
• Female residence
• household pattern and family
• Work categories
• Division of labour
Aaoni jaoni
• Agriculture work
• Changes in purdah
• Wage work
• Daughter’s work and prestations
• Aoni jaoni and incorporation
Family, Marriage and
Kinship
Basic concepts 2
Theoretical Perspectives
• Functionalism
• Conflict
• Marxism
Definition
• A socially defined set of relationships between at
least two people related by birth, marriage,
adoption, or, in some definitions, long-standing ties
of intimacy is defined as a ‘family’
• Kinship ties are connections between individuals,
established either through marriage or through the
lines of descent that connect blood relatives
• Marriage- socially acknowledged and approved
union between two adult individuals can be defined
as Marriage.
For Family
• Key Questions: How do families vary across
different societies, historical periods, classes,
and ethnic groups?
• How are authority, resources, and work
distributed within families?
• How do parents, particularly mothers,
balance the demands of work and family?
• What are the causes and effects of divorce,
domestic violence, and single parenting?
Family
• The most important primary group
• " To destroy caste system and adopt Western European social system
means that Hindus must give up the principle of hereditary
occupation which is the soul of the caste system.
• Hereditary principle is an eternal principle. To change it is to create
disorder. I have no use for a Brahmin if I cannot call him a Brahmin for
my life. It will be a chaos if every day a Brahmin is to be changed into a
Shudra and a Shudra is to be changed into a Brahmin.
• " The caste system is & natural order of society. In India it has been
given a religious coating. Other countries not having understood the
utility of the Caste System it existed only in a loose condition and
consequently those countries have not derived from Caste system the
same degree of advantage which India has derived.
Maha- Atma
• I am opposed to all those who are out to destroy the Caste System-
Gandhi (1922)
• The varna system is connected with the way of earning a living.
There is no harm if a person belonging to one varna acquires the
knowledge or science and art specialised by persons belonging to
other varnas. But as far as the way of earning his living is concerned
he must follow the occupation of the varna to which he belongs
which means he must follow the hereditary profession of his
forefathers.
• " The object of the varna system is to prevent competition and class
struggle and class war. I believe in the varna system because it
fixes the duties and occupations of persons,
• "Varna means the determination of a man's occupation before he is
born.
• " In the Varna system no man has any liberty to choose his
occupation. His occupation is determined for him by heredity."
Mr. M.K.Gandhi
• Mr. Gandhi : As a President of a Conference of the
Untouchables, "I do not want to attain Moksha. I do not
want to be reborn. But if I have to be reborn, I should be
born an untouchable, so that I may share their sorrows,
sufferings and the affronts levelled at them, in order that I
may Endeavour to free myself and them from that
miserable condition. I, therefore prayed that if I should be
born again, I should do so not as a Brahmin, Kshatriya,
Vaishya, or Shudra, but as an Atishudra.” (Babasaheb
Ambedkar Writing and Speeches: What Congress and
Gandhi have done to the untouchables: chapter XI:
Gandhism: The Doom of the untouchables)
Ctd…
• "l love scavenging. In my Ashram, an eighteen
years old Brahmin lad is doing the scavenger's
work in order to teach the Ashram scavengers
cleanliness. The lad is no reformer. He was born
and bred in orthodoxy. But he felt that his
accomplishments were incomplete until he had
become also a perfect sweeper, and that if he
wanted the Ashram sweeper to do his work
well, he must do it himself and set an example.
You should realise that you are cleaning Hindu
Society.”
Crushing Gandhi and ism
• lt may be your interest to be our masters, but how can it be ours to be
"
your slaves ? "
• —THUCYDIDES.
• Can there be a worse example of false propaganda than this attempt of
Gandhism to perpetuate evils which have been deliberately imposed by
one class over another ? If Gandhism preached the rule of poverty for all
and not merely for the Shudra the worst that could be said about it is
that it is a mistaken idea. But why preach it as good for one class only ?
Why appeal to the worst of human failings, namely, pride and vanity in
order to make him voluntarily accept what on a rational basis he would
resent as a cruel discrimination against him ? What is the use of telling
scavenger that even a Brahmin is prepared to do scavenging when It is
clear that according to Hindu Shastras and Hindu notions even if a
Brahmin did scavenging he would never be subject to the disabilities of
one who is a born scavenger ? For in India a man is not a scavenger
because of his work. He is a scavenger because of his birth irrespective
of the question whether he does scavenging or not.
Criticism rooted in a
Perspective
• To preach that poverty is good for the Shudra and
for none else, to preach that scavenging is good
for the Untouchables and for none else and to
make them accept these onerous impositions as
voluntary purposes of life, by appeal to their
failings is an outrage and a cruel joke on the
helpless classes which none but Mr. Gandhi can
perpetuate with equanimity and impunity. ( BAWS)
Conflict
• Conflict is a theory or perspective which
emphasize the role of Conflict especially
between groups and classes in human
society
• The main features of conflict theories was
that:
• They accused the functionalist theorist of
disregarding conflicts of values and
interest in human societies, or at best
regarding these as secondary
phenomenon
Roots
• Origins can be located in works of
Max Weber
• Stressed on role of interests over
norms and values
• Pursuit of interest generates conflict
as normal aspects of social life
Marxian Thread
• Conflict theory was drawn from Marx’s work
• Stressed on conflict as basis of social change
• It is conflict and not solidarity that is symbol of
dynamic society
• Differences with Marx- there are different sources of
conflict- ideas, intellectuals, can cause conflict not
only classes
• Focus on institutionalisation of conflict
• Ralph Dahrendorf and Rex for further reading
Alternative
• As a alternative to functionalist,
conflict theorist offered an account of
both integration of society and social
change, which emphasized the role of
power, coercion, thus indicating role
of conflict as the most important
• They proposed that conflict has a role,
and that is to bring social change
Powerful arguments
• Although some scholars such as Gouldner
were influenced by Marxist or Marxism, one
important work of Lewis Coser’s argument
was based on Simmel. He cited social
functions and disruptive effects of conflict
• In essence, conflict theorist although
brought conflict to the forefront, they
suggested that there were more conflicts
than functional unity however, underscored
importance of institutionalization of conflicts
for continuity of soicety
Karl Marx
• 1818-1883
• German social theorist
• Dialectical materialism
• Historical Materialism
Historical Materialism
• General term for Marx and Engels
conception of historical, social, and
economic change, and the method of
analysis associated with this
• Marx’s conceptualisation of Historical
Materialism is expressed in his work
(1859) a contribution to the critique
of political economy’.
• Human beings are socially producing. This
distinguishes them from other animals/living
beings (German Ideology)
• The identity of humans lies in collective rather
than individual.
• The essence of man is not an abstraction inherent
in each particular individual. The real nature of
man is the totality of social relations” (Theses on
Feuerbach)
Change
• Drawn from dialectics (dialogue)
• Change represents opposing forces
• Positive (thesis) and negative (antithesis)
• Together (synthesis) they determine nature of
change
Materialism Vs Idealism
For Marx, matter is supreme
Ideas originate for material existence and not
vice-versa
‘It is not consciousness that determines human
existence, rather human existence determines
consciousness’
Modes of Production
• Based on two aspects:
• a mode of production (in German: Produktionsweise,
meaning 'the way of producing') is a specific
combination of:
• Productive forces : these include human labour
power and the means of production (eg. tools,
equipment, physical infrastructure)
• social and technical relations of production : these
include the property, power and control relations
governing society's productive assets, often codified in
law, cooperative work relations and forms of association,
relations between people and the objects of their work,
and the relations between social classes.
Ctd
• Contradiction between humans and nature
• People must consume to survive, but to consume they must
produce, and in producing they necessarily enter into
relations which exist independently of their will. These
again are shaped by contradictions
• Between humans-those with property those without
• Private property is the basis of division of labour
• First forms of property seen in family
• the whole ‘mystery' of why/how a social order exists and
the causes of social change must be discovered in the
specific mode of production that a society has
Outline
• Primitive Communism (shared production,
consumption, no surplus)
• Asiatic mode of production (pre slavery, pre-feudal,
exploited bands, villages, hamlets, communities by
the ruling class, generally authority on the basis on
semi-theocratic- messengers of gods, incarnations of
god itself, control by use of violence)
• Antique mode of production (property possession in
form of individuals- claims that ruling class is
descendants of gods rather than gods
• Feudalism (he primary form of property is the
possession of land in reciprocal contract relations: the
possession of human beings as peasants or serfs is
dependent upon their being entailed upon the land)
Ctd
• Early Capitalism (period from Mercantilism to Imperialism
and is usually associated with the emergence of modern
industrial society. The primary form of property is the
possession of objects and services through state guaranteed
contract. The primary form of exploitation is wage labour .
The ruling class is the bourgeoisie which exploits the
proletariat. Capitalism may produce one class (bourgeoisie)
who possess the means of production for the whole of society
and another class who possess only their own labour power,
which they must sell in order to survive. The key forces of
production include the overall system of modern production
with its supporting structures of bureaucracy and the modern
state, and finance capital.
Late Capitalism and
Communism
• Late Capitalism (state capitalism, mixed
economy, emergence of corporations etc,
distinctive characteristics is ‘financialization’
making money becomes a dominant industry-
stocks, investment bankers, etc
• Communism (classless society, management of
things, management of people will be central
concern)
CLASS
• So far as millions of families live under
economic conditions of existence that separate
their mode: of life, their interests and their
culture from those of the other classes, and put
them in hostile opposition to the latter, they
form a class”
How is the class formed?
• Base: Mode of production
• Superstructure: Political, religious, ideological
etc.
• Superstructure is determined by base
Engel’s clarification
• According to the materialistic concept of
history the ultimately determining factor in
history is the production and reproduction of
real life. Neither Marx nor I have ever
asserted more than this. Hence if somebody
twists this into saying that the economic
factor is the only determining factor, he
transforms this proposition into a
meaningless, abstract phrase.
Finally…
• The economic situation is the basis,
but the various elements of the
super-structure ...also exercise their
influence upon the course of
historical struggles and in many
cases determine their form in
particular"
From being ‘Children of
God to Children of
Ambedkar’
Examine the Rise of
Ambedkar in Indian Polity and
his movements for Social
Justice
Timeline, Aspects to be
covered
• Dalit world pre- independence
• Rise of shudras
• Rise of Dalits, socio-cultural aspects
• Role of British in empowerment of Dalits
• Deplorable practices against Dalits and Shudras
• Resistance offered by Shudras, through education, organizations
• Communal Awards and Brahmindom
• Efficiency over fair and goodness for masses
• Gandhi Vs Ambedkar- Poona Pact, ‘ Gandhiji, I have no homeland’- Ambedkar
• Post Ambedkar
• Dalit Panthers- Impact of Black Panthers Movement on young Dalit poets
• Fragmentation, disillusion, and coopted leadership
• Bahujan Samaj Party- rise of a staunch Ambedkarite, Kanshiram. His ideas- political
power – BAMCEF, Electoral Politics,
• Yet Conditions of Dalits in India- Atrocities, Khairlanje, Justice denied is justice delayed.
Poverty and inequality and oppression.
Omprakash Valmiki
• You said The Shudra is born from the feet of Brahma,
And the Brahmin from his head, And they did not ask
you, Where was Brahma born from? You said Service
is the duty of the Shudra, They did not ask What will
you give for it? You were happy, You now had
slaves , They were happy too- Happy for you , They
had put all their power In your hands. The body
unclothed, The stomach unfed, Hurt, and yet, They
smiled, For they saw you smiled., They did not know
how to loot, The weak and the innocent! Did not know,
That murder, Is the badge of courage, That robbery is
not a crime, It is but culture. How innocent they were,
My ancestors, Humane, Yet untouchable.
Background Historical Past:
how important is it?
• It might be argued that the inequality prescribed
by Manu in his Smriti is after all of historical
importance. It is past history and cannot be
supposed to have any bearing on the present
conduct of the Hindu. I am sure nothing can
be greater error than this. Manu is not a matter
of the past. It is even more than a past of the
present. It is a ‘living past’ and therefore as
really present as any present can be (Untitled
Works of Ambedkar, in chapter 57, Manu and
Shudras)
Heinous Practices against
untouchables
• The inequality laid down by Manu was the law of the land
under the pre-British days may not be known to many
foreigners.
• Under the rule of the Marathas and the Peshwas the
Untouchables were not allowed within the gates
of Poona city, the capital of the Peshwas, between 3
p. m. and 9 a. m. because, before nine and after three,
their bodies cast too long a shadow; and whenever their
shadow fell upon a Brahmin it polluted him, so that he
dare not taste food or water until he had bathed and
washed the impurity away. So also no Untouchable was
allowed to live in a walled town ; cattle and dogs could
freely enter but not the Untouchables (Dr Ambedkar cites
work of Dr. John Murray Mitchell- ‘Great Religions of
India’, p. 63)
Ctd….
• Under the rule of the Marathas and the
Peshwas the Untouchables might not spit on
the ground lest a Hindu should be polluted
by touching it with his foot, but had to hang
an earthen pot round his neck to hold his
spittle. He was made to drag a thorny branch
of a tree with him to brush out his footsteps
and when a Brahman came by, had to lie at
a distance on his face lest his shadow might
fall on the Brahman (cited Bombay
Gazetteer. Vol. XII. p. 175.)
Pan India Practices
• In Maharashtra an Untouchable was required to wear a
black thread either in his neck or on his wrist for the
purpose of ready identification.
• In Gujarat the Untouchables were compelled to wear a
horn as their distinguishing mark[Ency R.&. E. Vol. IX
p. 636 (b)
• In the Punjab a sweeper was required while walking
through streets in towns to carry a broom in his hand
or under his armpit as a mark of his being a scavenger
(Punjab Census Report 1911 p. 413)
• In Bombay the Untouchables were not permitted to
wear clean or untorn clothes. In fact the shopkeepers
took the precaution to see that before cloth was sold
to the Untouchable it was torn & soiled.
Pan India
• In Malabar the Untouchables were not allowed
to build houses above one storey in height and
not allowed to cremate their dead
• In Malabar the Untouchables were not
permitted to carry umbrellas, to wear shoes or
golden ornaments, to milk cows or even to use
the ordinary language of the country
• In South India Untouchables were expressly
forbidden to cover the upper part of their body
above the waist and in the case of women of
the Untouchables they were compelled to go
with the upper part of their bodies quite bare
Letter Send to Damulsett Trimbucksett
by Head of the caste Sonar
(Goldsmith) Date: 9th August 1779
• Under the Maratha rule any one other than a Brahmin uttering a
Veda Mantra was liable to have his tongue cut off and as a matter of fact the
tongues of several Sonars (goldsmiths) were actually cut off by the order of
the Peshwa for their daring to utter the Vedas contrary to law.
• All over India Brahmin was exempt from capital punishment. He could not be
hanged even if he committed murder.
• Under the Peshwas distinction was observed in the punishment of the
criminals according to the caste. Hard labour and death were punishments
mostly visited on the Untouchables[
• Under the Peshwas Brahmin clerks had the privilege of their goods being
exempted from certain duties and their imported corn being carried to them
without any ferry charges; and Brahmin landlords had their lands assessed at
distinctly lower rates than those levied from other classes. In Bengal the
amount of rent for land varied with the caste of the occupant and if the
tenant was an Untouchable he had to pay the highest rent.
Continuity of Manu
• These facts will show
that Manu though born centuries ago
is not dead and while the Hindu Kings
reigned, justice between Hindu and
Hindu, touchable and untouchable
was rendered according to the Law of
Manu and that law was professed
based on inequality.
Rise of Shudras
In September, 1873, Jotirao, along with his followers, formed the
Satya Shodhak Samaj (Society of Seekers of Truth) with the
main objective of the organisation as to liberate the Shudras and
Ati-Shudras and to prevent them from exploitations and
atrocities done by the Brahmins.
For his fight to attain equal rights for peasants and the lower
caste and his contribution to the field of education, he is
regarded as one of the most important figures in Social Reform
Movement in Maharashtra. Dhananjay Keer, his biographer,
rightly notes him as "the father of Indian social revolution’
241
Social Structure (SS)
Herbert Spencer used it first. Important concept in
sociology.
• Emphasized its need looking at society like a biological
entity (organic structure).
Approaches to understanding it:
(1) Radcliffe-Brown considered all social relations of
person to person to be a part of SS.
Also the distinction between the system of ‘ideal relations’
and the system of ‘actual relations’ between persons as
SS.
244
Primary Institutions Secondary Institutions
245
Institutions Manifest/intended functions Latent/unintended functions
Family Procreation and rearing children Support in old age and sense of pride
over children
Education Development of literacy, training forKeeping the youth off the labour market,
occupational roles, inculcation ofweakening the control of parents or
basic values development of friendship.
Economic system To produce and distribute goods To promote urbanization, labour unions
and redirect education.
246
Family
• Basic unit in all societies;
• Quintessential Primary group;
• Main conduit of norms and values;
• The chief agency of socialization;
• The source of solace;
Characteristics:
• Mating relationship;
• Family through Marriage;
• A system of nomenclature: family name; its own system of tracing
descent;
• An economic provision to satisfy the economic needs of the family;
• Common habitation: home for its living;
• Bond among members;
248
Types of family
On the basis of authority: Patriarchal & Matriarchal
Patriarchal family: 1. wife moves to husband’s house; 2. father
as supreme lord of family; 3. Descent is reckoned through the
father; 4. children are known by the name of the family of their
father; 5. children can inherit the property of their father; is
lives with senior male member holds power;
Matriarchal: 1. Authority in the family is with the wife or her
relatives; 2. Descent is reckoned through the mother; 2.
Marriage relations are transient. The husband is sometimes
merely a casual visitor; 3. children brought up in the home of
wife’s relatives; property is transferred through the mother
and only females succeed to it.
249
Types of family
On the basis of structure:
• Nuclear
• Extended family;
On the basis of residence:
• Matrilocal (husband moves wife’s home),
• Patrilocal (Wife moves to husband’s home) -
On the basis of marriage:
• Monogamous (one man marries one woman )
• Polygamous (one man marries many women),
• Polyandrous (one woman marries many men and lives with all of
them or with each of them alternatively);
ISSUES:
250
Types of family
On the basis of ancestry:
• Matrilineal (mother the basis of ancestry),
• Patrilineal (ancestry through father).
On the basis of In-group & out-group affiliation:
• Endogamous (marriage within group),
• Exogamous (marriage with members outside the
group);
On the basis of blood relationship:
• Conjugal family (spouses, their offspring and
relatives through marriage),
• Consanguinous family (blood relatives together
with their mates and children)
251
RELIGION
• It is said that all laws, customs and norms are based on what
religion advocates as right or wrong.
• It is the most influential force of social control.
• “Religion is attitude towards superhuman powers” – Ogburn.
• Religion is a belief in “powers superior to man which are
believed to direct and control the course of nature and of
human life” – James G Frazer.
• “Religion…implies a relationship not merely between man and
man but also between man and some higher power” – MacIver.
• “Whenever and wherever man has a sense of dependence on
external powers which are conceived as mysterious and higher
than man’s own, there is religion, and the feelings of awe and
self-abasement with which man is filled in the presence of such
powers is essentially a religious emotion, the root of worship
and prayer” –Christopher Dawson.
252
Religion
• Religion is a “unified system of beliefs and practices
relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart
and forbidden” – Durkheim.
• Sumner and Keller asserted that “Religion in history from
the earliest to very recent days has not been a matter of
morality at all but of rites, ritual, observance and
ceremony.”
253
Origin of religion
• No definite answer to its origin.
• David Hume, Max Muller and Giddings claimed that religion as
creation of man was based on an illusion and that fear
accounted for its origin.
• Spencer and Tyler contented that religion originated primarily in
ghost-fear and that animism lies at the very basis of all
religions.
• Galloway observes, “The fact that men everywhere and always
have developed religion—for there is no evidence that any tribe
or race has existed without it points to the truth that religion
must have its roots in human nature. No accident or
environment or tenacity of tradition can account for what is
constant and persistent; that which is universal in experience
must be a genuine expression of man’s life.
• Like other social institutions, religion also arose from the
intellectual power of man in response to certain felt needs of
man, or because of conditions accompanying his life on earth.
254
Role of Religion
• Rationalizes and makes bearable individual suffering in the
known world;
• Enhances self-importance;
• Helps to knit the social values of society into cohesive
whole.
• Social welfare;
• Agency of social control;
• Religion controls and affects economic life. Materialism did
not grow (till recently) because Hinduism stresses on
spiritual progress than the material progress.
• Promotion of literature, art and music;
• Friendship function: opportunity for establishing friendship;
ISSUES:
255
What are social
institutions?
Social Institutions
• Social Institutions
• Social institutions are established or
standardized patterns of rule-
governed behavior. They include the
family, education, religion, and
economic and political institutions.
Major perspectives
Marx
• Social institutions are determined by their society’s mode
of production.
• Social institutions serve to maintain the power of the
dominant class.
Weber
• Social institutions are interdependent but no single
institution determines the rest.
• The causes and consequences of social institutions
cannot be assumed in advance.
Durkheim
• Set the stage for later functionalist analyses of
institutions by concluding that religion promotes social
solidarity and collective conscience.
Theoretical Perspective
• Functionalist theory
• The social institutions listed in this section (along
with other social institutions) fulfill functional
prerequisites and are essential.
• Conflict theory
• Social institutions tend to reinforce inequalities
and uphold the power of dominant groups.
• Emphasizes divisions and conflicts within social
institutions.
• Symbolic interactionism
• Focuses on interactions and other symbolic
communications within social institutions.
Family
Family:
• A socially defined set of relationships between at least
two people related by birth, marriage, adoption, or, in
some definitions, long-standing ties of intimacy.
• Key Questions: How do families vary across different
societies, historical periods, classes, and ethnic groups?
• How are authority, resources, and work distributed
within families?
• How do parents, particularly mothers, balance the
demands of work and family?
• What are the causes and effects of divorce, domestic
violence, and single parenting?
Competing views
• Marx: The family upholds the capitalist
economic order by ensuring the reproduction of
the working class and by maintaining
housewives as a reserve labor force.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of the family
include socializing children, regulating sexual
behavior and reproduction, distributing
resources, providing social support.
Education
• A formal process in which knowledge, skills, and
values are systematically transmitted from one
individual or group to another.
• Key Questions: How do educational practices vary
across different societies and historical periods?
• How does education affect individuals’ subsequent
activities and achievements?
• What are the effects of class, race, and gender on
educational institutions and experiences?
• What are the causes and consequences of various
trends in education, such as grade inflation, violence
in schools, and increasing public funding of religious
instruction?
Marx, Functionalist, Conflict,
SI
• Marx: Education serves the capitalist order by producing
skilled workers with habits such as punctuality and
respect for authority.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of education include
transmitting shared values and beliefs, transmitting
specific knowledge and skills, sorting individuals based
on skill, and establishing social control over youths.
• Conflict theory: Educational tracking systems and other
differential treatment of students reinforce social
inequalities.
• Symbolic interactionism: Face-to-face interactions in
the classroom can have long-range consequences for
students’ educational achievements.
Religion
• Religion:
• A unified system of beliefs and practices pertaining to the
supernatural and to norms about the right way to live that is
shared by a group of believers. Sociologists treat religion as a
social rather than supernatural phenomenon.
• Key Questions: How do the world religions differ? How are
they similar?
• How have religions developed and changed, and why do
people engage with them?
• What is the relationship between religion and other aspects
of social life such as stratification, deviance, and conflict?
• What are the causes and consequences of contemporary
trends such as secularization, the splintering of religious
groups, and shifting church–state relationships?
Opium, spiritualism,
functions…..
• Marx: Religion is the “opium of the people”—it masks domination
and diverts workers from rebelling against exploitation.
• Weber: Classified religions by their approach to salvation:
– Ascetic religions require active self-mastery; mystical religions
require passive contemplation.
– Other-worldly religions require focus on the next life (e.g., heaven);
this-worldly religions require focus on earthly life.
• Durkheim: Religion provides social solidarity and collective
conscience; it expresses and celebrates the force of society over
the individual.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of religion include providing
meaning for life, reinforcing social norms, strengthening social
bonds, and marking status changes (e.g., marriage).Dysfunctions,
according to some, include justifying persecution.
Economic Institutions
• Sociologists understand the economy as the set of
arrangements by which a society produces, distributes, and
consumes goods, services, and other resources.
• Key Questions: What institutions and relations characterize
different economic systems (e.g., capitalism, socialism, and
feudalism)?
• How do consumption and leisure patterns differ among
various cultures, historical periods, and social groups?
• How do the structures of business organizations affect
productivity, job satisfaction, and inequalities?
• What are the causes and consequences of contemporary
trends such as economic liberalization, declining unionization,
and increased consumer debt?
Marx/Functionalism
• Marx: Economic organization (the means
and relations of production) determines the
major features of any society.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of
economic institutions include: production
and distribution of goods, assignment of
individuals to different social roles such as
occupations.
Political Institutions
• Political Institutions:
• Institutions that pertain to the
governance of a society, its formal
distribution of authority, its use of
force, and its relationships to other
societies and political units. The state,
an important political institution in
modern societies, is the apparatus of
governance over a particular territory.
Key questions
• Key Questions: How do political institutions differ
across historical periods and societies?
• How do different social groups participate in political
institutions, and with what consequences?
• How and why do individuals participate in political
processes such as voting or joining lobbying groups?
• How are political institutions related to other aspects
of society, such as the economy and the mass
media?
Authority/Functions/Democr
acy
• Weber: Defines the state as an authority that maintains
a monopoly on the use of violence in its territory.
• Functionalist theory: Functions of political institutions
include protection from external enemies, resolving
group conflicts, defining societal goals, and
strengthening group identity and norms. Pluralism, a
particularly functional type of political institution, entails
distribution of power among many groups so no one
group can gain control.
• Conflict theory: Pluralism and democracy are illusions
that invite the powerless to believe that they have a
voice in governance, when in fact their control is quite
limited.
Marriage
• Marriage is a universal feature of human societies
• It confers on men and women or of same sex ‘social
legitimation’ to engage in sexual relations,
reproduction (not necessary) and child rearing
• To a large extent marriage is not a matter of free
choice, it is socially derived and socially sanctioned
(Khap panchayats, kinship pressures, parent’s choice,
social choice etc)
• Every known society places certain limitations on the
range of persons from among whom spouses may be
chosen. Two major rules of marriage present in
almost all societies are: exogamy and endogamy
Exogamy (Exit)
• This is a social prescription that
requires an individual to marry
outside a specific culturally defined
social groups of which he/she is a
member. This practice serves to
enhance and improve sociability
among people by connecting groups
of people.
Endogamy
Theory
Dalit Movement
Definition
• Social movement is one of the major
forms of collective behavior
• It is defined as ‘collectivity acting with
some continuity to promote or resist
change in the society or a group of
which it is a part’
• Stated less formally, a social
movement is a collective effort to
promote or resist change
origin
• Unplanned, unorganized, and undirected
groupings of people who are dissatisfied with
things.
• People talk, share ideas, and grumble,
intellectuals publish articles, citizens write
letters to editor, and thus people use various
forms to express
• Leadership and organization develops
• After active life, the movement phases out,
sometimes leaving permanent organizations
theories
• There are two types of theories of
social movements
• Psychological
• Sociological
Psychological
• Discontent theory: this theory believes that social
movement is rooted in discontent. People may
endure great discontent without joining the
movement itself. Oppression, inequality, brutality,
corruption etc have been some of the conditions
leading to discontent. Movement may emerge out
of the discontent. However, discontent may be
necessary but not a sufficient cause for social
movement
Personality Maladjustment
• According to this theory, root of
movement lies in personal failure. The
proponents of this theory argue that many
of the social movements find their
supporters among the unhappy,
frustrated, persons whose lives lack
meaning and fulfillment. Example, Hitler’s
frustration of being rejected as a serious
artist.
Sociological Theory
• Relative Deprivation Theory: It is a term
coined by Stouffer
• According to him, relative deprivation
arises as a result of gap between
expectation and realization.
• More prominent in underdeveloped
world, because there is an increasing
desire for material possession
• Feelings of deprivation are easy to infer
but difficult to measure
Resource Mobilization
Theory
• This theory attributes importance to the effective
use of resources in promoting social movements,
since a successful social movement demands an
effective leadership, organization, tactics.
• The resources to be mobilized include supporting
beliefs, laws that can leverage the cause,
organizations and officials that can be helpful,
potential benefits to be promoted, target groups
whom these benefits might attract, and any other
possible aids.
• The theory is mostly based on description and
seriously challenged by scholars
Types of Social Movements
• Migratory Movement- discontent people may
wish to move. When many move in volume at
the same time, it is called migratory
movement. Common focus of discontent, a
shared purpose of hope, and widely shared
decision to move to a new location. For
example, Zionist movements, the movement
of Jews back to Israel, The Rastafari
movement
Expressive Movement
• When people cannot move and cannot easily
change things, they choose to do something
else.
• They try to change themselves, change their
reactions to reality instead of trying to change
reality itself.
• Jamaica, where poverty and inequality are
extreme and economic distress has been
growing, a music of social protest called Reggae
has seized the popular imagination
• Graffiti is another example
• Black Rose is another example
Movements
• Utopian: These are attempts to create a perfect society in
miniature. Then this model could be copied and perhaps
the entire could be transformed. Kibbutz of Israel is
considered as an example
• Reform movement: in such movements, there are
attempts to improve the society without greatly changing
its basic social structure.
Movements
• Revolutionary Movement: A social revolution is
sudden, sweeping and usually violent
• Revolutionaries oppose reforms, because they
believe that significant reform is impossible under
the existing social system
• They see basic change is possible only after the
existing order is overthrown and the elite are
deposed, often through execution or exile
• Resistance Movement: it expresses opposition to
recent change as people consider social change too
fast. Example: the resistance offered against Mandal
Commission Recommendations
Dalit Movement
• Dalit Movement has been suggested to
have two characteristics in terms of
protest ideology
• One which emphasizes withdrawal, self
organization, and establishes a parallel
legitimacy, and the other which
abandons Brahminical Hinduism.
• Embraces Buddhism or another
egalitarian religion to raise their self
respect and worth
Ideological Base and
Leaders
• Mahar Movement, which was led by Dr Bheemroa
Ambedkar
• His movement represented an ideology of protest
in the form of abandoning Hinduism and embracing
Buddhism which is considered more egalitarian
• Mahars were numerically significant caste who fell
under untouchable category
• They were made to do menial and worthless jobs,
sweeping, digging graves etc
• Access to well, public tanks schools were denied
ctd
• Mahars organized themselves to improve
their status and fight against several
injustice done against them
• In 1902, they were already fighting for their
inclusion in military service
• The entry of Dr Ambedkar in 1920s, made
the Mahar movement more radical than
reformatory
• Ambedkar opposed to the patronizing
attitude of upper caste leaders
Use of Political Machinery
• Ambedkar, adopted the ideology of anti-caste
Hinduism and relied more on political machinery to
achieve the basic rights
• Thus, Ambedkar was able to win political
representation for the untouchables
• This intellectual giant single handedly drafted the
constitution of India, which introduced many
safeguards in favor of the SCs
• 14 October 1956, he and his followers became
Buddhist. At Yeola in 1930s, he had announced that ‘ I
may be born as a Hindu but will not die as a Hindu’
Dalit Panthers Movement
• While I write this at night
it’s three o’ clock
Though I want to have a drink
I don’t feel like drinking.
Only I want to sleep peacefully
And tomorrow morning see no varnas
• - Namdeo Dhasal
Namdeo Dhasal’s Literary
Work
• The times were just ripe for the protest movement of
dalits to germinate…. The most notable example of
this protest came in light in the form of Golpitha- a
collection of poems by Namdeo Dhasal. Golpitha –
name of a red-light district in Mumbai, depicted the
tough life of a dalit there and is considered as
Dhasal’s most stellar work. People were shocked by
the raw energy exuded by each of its word entirely
unfamiliar to the established literary circles. They
had never seen quite like it before. Its proletarian
lingo, iconoclastic imagery, defiant idiom and terrible
anger shook the establishment to its very
foundation. A spate of poetry followed' - Anand
Teltumbde
Ram Puniyani
• Dalit panthers came up as the most promising
organisation for dalit rights and their path was
that of alliance with the other oppressed sections
of society. They broadened the definition of
dalits to include workers, minorities, adivasis and
women. This indicated the line of alliance to be
followed. This last concerted effort fell to pieces
with different leaders of dalit movement getting
co-opted by one or the other political power or
personality
Formation
• In April 1972, the Dalit Panther Party was
formed in slums and Dalit colonies of Bombay,
India. This organization takes its pride and
inspiration directly from the Black Panther
Party of the United States.
• This is a highly important development due to
the fact that the Untouchables have historically
been so systematically terrorized that many of
them, even today, live in a perpetual state of
extreme fear of their upper caste oppressors.
This is especially evident in the villages.
• The formation of the Dalit Panthers and the
corresponding philosophy that accompanies it signals
a fundamental change in the annals of resistance,
and Dalit Panther organizations have subsequently
spread to other parts of India.
• In August 1972, the Dalit Panthers announced that
the 25th anniversary of Indian independence would
be celebrated as a day of mourning.
• Appropriation and Containing Dalit Rage: short lived
movement which stirred the 1970s, Dalit Panthers
came to be militant organization
Black Panthers of USA
• A man who stands for nothing will fall for
anything. Malcolm X
• I am for violence if non-violence means we
continue postponing a solution to the
American black man's problem just to
avoid violence. M
• Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can
give you equality or justice or anything. If
you're a man, you take it.
Malcolm X- Black Panthers
Party
Black Panthers Party
Patterns of Dalit Panthers
• Literature
• Mobilization
• Graffiti, Folk Music
• Self Military Model
• Self Defense
• Demanded Arms and Licensed Guns
for Dalits in Villages
BSP: Identity of Political
Revolution
• Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) or Majority People's Party
is one of the only five prominent national political
parties of India, which is the largest democracy of
the world.