Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Numbers Game!
DuPont Analysis
Reporters:
Kevin Camato Hanah Feria
Dorothy Gatoc Jacob Jereza
RG Lucero Janice Tanongtanong
Background of the Case
Plastichem Inc., a medium-sized plastic molding company, was founded in 1990 and was
located in Midland, Michigan. The company supplied molded plastic products to various
processing industries as well as end-users. It enjoyed a fairly diversified base of customers
ranging from automobile and home products manufacturers to the federal government.
Background of the Case
After an initial period of sluggish growth, the firm's revenues and profits had almost
quadrupled. Most of the increase had been achieved under the leadership of Andrew Sullivan.
The plastics business offered potential for high profit margins and as a result it attracted many
competitors. Despite the fierce competition, Plastichem's stock, which traded in the over-the-
counter market, had tripled in value over the past five years making the shareholders very
happy.
Background of the Case
Recently, however, the stock price had dipped sharply, raising concerns among security
analysts. Jack Brown, the assistant VP of Finance, brought this matter to Andrew's attention
informing him that the analysts had given their closest rival, DCM Molding, a "Strong Buy"
rating while downgrading Plastichem's rating to a "Hold." This recent development had outraged
shareholders and the Personal Relations department had been overwhelmed with calls from
anxious owners wanting to know what was going on.
Background of the Case
Andrew, a motivated leader, was not about to give up easily, however. His track record
of turning companies around was very good. He knew that if he could identify the main problem
areas, he would be able to make some strategic moves to alleviate the problems. He, therefore,
demanded that he be given a detailed report of the firm's financial condition in comparison to that
of DCM Molding. Andrew had learned over the years that in order to be successful it was
very important to "play the numbers game."
Table 1: Plastichem Balance
Sheet
Plastichem Incorporated
Annual Balanc e Sheet s (Values in millions)
2004 2003 2002 2001
ASSETS
Curre nt Asse ts
C ash and marketable securities 3.2 4.8 5 0.6
Accounts receivable 46.1 59.6 50.1 20.9
Inventory 27.4 24.1 25.3 12.8
Other C urrent assets 4.1 7.6 6.9 0.4
Total C urrent Assets 80.8 96.1 87.3 34.7
Total C ommon Shares outstanding 7.7 Mil 7.2 Mil 7.6 Mil 6.6 Mil
referred Shares 0 0 0 0
Treasury Shares 0 0 0 0
Table 2: DCM Balance Sheet
DCM Molding
Annual Balanc e Sheet s (Values in millions)
2004 2003 2002 2001
ASSETS
Curre nt Asse ts
Total C ommon Shares outstanding 4.3 mil 4.3 mil 4.3 mil 4.1 mil
Preferred Shares 0 0 0 0
Treasury Shares 0 0 0 0
Table 3: Plastichem Income
Statement Plastichem Incorporated
Annual Inc ome St at ement s (Values in millions)
2004 2003 2002 2001
Sales 297 294 252.4 129.3
C ost of Sales 222.2 184.5 160 84.1
Gross Operating profit 74.8 109.5 92.4 45.2
Selling, General & Admin. Expenses 39.4 54.5 47.1 26.8
EBITDA 35.4 55 45.3 18.4
Depreciation & Amortization 18.3 16.2 14.7 5.7
EBIT 17.1 38.8 30.6 12.7
Other Income, Net -0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1
Total Income Avail for Interest Exp. 16.6 39.4 30.9 12.8
Interest Expense 22.4 20.3 15.6 5.2
Minority Interest 0 0 0 0
Pre-Tax Income -5.8 19.1 15.3 7.6
Income Taxes 0.1 2.1 6.6 0.3
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant & Equipment, Gross 35.40% 28.70% 25.90% 48.00% 47.28% 42.08% 43.44% 56.39%
Accumulated depreciation & Depletion 14.40% 9.10% 8.10% 19.40% 17.20% 12.66% 11.09% 10.83%
Property, Plant & Equipment, Net 21.00% 19.60% 17.70% 28.60% 30.08% 29.42% 32.34% 45.56%
Intangibles 45.70% 50.10% 53.50% 33.00% 33.30% 35.46% 28.44% 5.28%
Other Non-Current Assets 2.90% 2.40% 3.10% 3.50% 0.22% 0.68% 1.56% 6.11%
Total Non-Current Assets 69.60% 72.10% 74.30% 65.10% 63.60% 65.56% 62.34% 56.94%
Total Assets 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Answer 2
LIABILITIES AND EQUITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable 7.70% 6.90% 6.00% 9.80% 7.66% 8.10% 8.28% 5.56%
Short Term Debt 2.48% 1.60% 1.00% 3.90% 7.44% 6.61% 4.22% 7.50%
Other current Liabilities 13.17% 9.80% 10.50% 13.00% 7.21% 8.10% 8.28% 18.06%
Total Current liabilities 23.40% 18.30% 17.60% 26.70% 22.31% 22.69% 20.63% 20.56%
Non-Current liabilities
Long-term debt 81.00% 64.40% 65.40% 30.90% 28.63% 31.93% 29.22% 15.00%
Deferred Income Taxes 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.11% 0.57% 0.00% 3.89%
Other Non-Current Liabilities 1.10% 0.80% 0.00% 0.00% 3.33% 4.45% 6.09% 2.22%
Minority Interest 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Total Non-Current Liabilities 82.10% 65.20% 65.40% 30.90% 32.08% 36.94% 35.31% 21.11%
Total Liabilities 105.50% 83.50% 82.90% 57.50% 54.38% 59.64% 55.94% 41.67%
Shareholder's Equity
Preferred Stock Equity 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Common Stock Equity -5.50% 16.50% 17.10% 42.50% 45.62% 40.36% 43.91% 58.33%
Total equity -5.50% 16.50% 17.10% 42.50% 45.62% 40.36% 43.91% 58.33%
Total liabilities and Stock Equity 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Answer 2
PLASTICHEM INCORPORATED DCM MOLDING
Annual Income Statements (Value in Millions)
2004% 2003% 2002% 2001% 2004% 2003% 2002% 2001%
Plastichem DCM
2004 2003 2002 2001 2004 2003 2002 2001
Profit Margin -0.2407 0.0068 0.0147 0.0565 0.0591 0.0619 0.0572 0.0532
Total Asset Turnover 1.1174 0.8549 0.7424 1.3008 1.3718 1.2166 1.3391 1.2
Equity Multiplier -18.331 6.076 5.8621 2.3555 2.1922 2.4774 2.2776 1.7143
Return on Asset -26.90% 0.58% 1.09% 7.35% 8.11% 7.53% 7.66% 6.38%
Return on Equity NMF 3.53% 6.40% 17.31% 17.77% 18.66% 17.45% 10.94%
Question 4
What are some of the limitations regarding the various analyses that have
been suggested above? What additional data would Jay and Jack need to
improve their findings? Are there any other calculations and comparisons that
would be helpful? Please explain.
Answer 4
Limitations:
• Many companies near the year or quarter end improve the appearance of their figures
presenting them in the most attractive way possible.
• Many firms also use different accounting methods which make comparing of different
companies difficult for instance there are two primary accounting methods used in USA,
cash and accrual accounting.
Answer 4
Additional Data for Improvement:
• look into the companies accounting practices and see if any off balance sheet items are
present
• A statement of cash flows would also useful in analysis, as it would allow in determining
the short-term viability of a company, particularly its ability to pay bills.
Question 5
After collecting, compiling, and analyzing the data, what conclusions and
recommendations would Jack be justified in making in his report to Andrew?
Answer 5
• DCM Molding has shown a better financial condition on average in the past four
years
• Plastichem has barely met the acceptable average or is below the average in the
past four years
• The cost of the sales for both the companies have increased. But, the cost of goods
sold for DCM is less than that of the Plastichem.
Answer 5
• DCM has a higher gross profit than Plastichem
• DCM Molding is doing far better with its figures showing much better results than
Plastichem
• Plastichem needs to increase profit margin after looking at the figures
• Plastichem was using many debts to finance its growth.
Question 6
In your opinion, how acute is the problem facing Plastichem, Inc.? What
strategic moves do you think Andrew could make to alleviate the problems?
Answer 6
Answer 6
• It should be treated as a serious problem.
• The strong drop in price will create fear for potential and current shareholders.
• The CFO should do a SWOT Analysis using the comparison.
• He should also find ways to pay off the company’s debt.
• He should control the company’s cost.
Question 7
How accurate are the analysts in their recommendations of the two firms?
Answer 7
Answer 7
• The analysts’ recommendations are accurate. DCM is performing well than
Plastichem based on the figures.
• The firm’s stocks will be greatly affected.