Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NACE
CORROSION 2011
March 13-17, 2011
Houston, Texas, USA 1
Outline of Presentation
FLUORO-POLYMER COATINGS
Composition of Fluoro-polymer
Fundamental Chemistry of Fluoro-polymer
Results of Molecular Weight Change of Fluoro-polymer
Compared with Polyurethane
FLUORO-POLYMER TOPCOAT OF SYSTEM
General Performance
Corrosion Protective Performance of Fluoro-polymer
Coatings Weather-ability of Fluoro-polymer Coating
TRACK RECORDS OF USE IN THE FIELD
Advanced Application
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
2
FLUORO-POLYMER FOR COATINGS
・ Composition of Fluoro-polymer
・ Fundamental Chemistry of Fluoro-polymer
・ Results of Molecular Weight Change of Fluoro-polymer
Compared with Polyurethane
3
Figure 1
Structure of Fluoro-polymer
4
Table 1
5
Table 2
Over sea
Binder Resins
Exposure Fluoro-
Polyurethane
polymer
Exposed period
0 3 0 3
(years)
Molecular weight
9,000 8,400 3,600 600
(Mn)
6
FLUORO-POLYMER TOPCOAT OF SYSTEM
・ General Performance
・ Corrosion Protective Performance of Fluoro-polymer Coatings
・ Weather-ability of Fluoro-polymer Coating
7
Table 3
8
Table 4
Performance of Fluoro-polymer
Topcoats in coating systems
9
Figure 2
Film resistance
after outdoor Exposure test (Miyakojima)
Film Resistance (W・cm2)
108
107
106
105
104
0 1 2 3 4
Exposure Time (Years)
:Fluoro-polymer System
: Polyurethane System
:Chlorinated Rubber System
13
Measurements of film consumption
(by observing the section of 15y exposure samples at Hiroshima)
Light proof
Cutting process
Observation of
The cross section
a) Fluoro-polymer b) Polyurethane
Light sealed label
Film
Film
consumption:
consumption:
22~28μm
A B 0~1.1μm D
C /15 years
/15 years
← 1/20 shrinking →
A, B, C, D area were for Imaging IR measurement as below (Figure 7)
15
Figure 7
17
Summary of degradation phenomena
for Fluoro-polymer vs. Polyurethane
19
Figure 10,11
100 10
Gloss Retention (%)
80 8
60 6
Chalking
40 4
20 2
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20
Exposure Time (years) Exposure Time (year)
Fluoro-polymer Coating Fluoro-polymer Coating
Polyurethane Coating Polyurethane Coating
20
Table 6, Figure 12:
24
SUMMARY
The fluoro-polymer topcoat was extremely superior to other topcoats
such as polyurethane, chlorinated rubber and alkyd in weather-ability.
The decrease of film thickness by surface degradation after 18 years
outdoor exposure was surprisingly less one micron.
Protective performance of fluoro-polymer topcoat system was
evaluated at a marine testing station. Degradation, such as rust,
blistering, and chalking, were not obvious after 20 years.
The protective performance was affected by the weather-ability of top
coating. Fluoro-polymer coating was excellent in weather-ability and its
top coated coating system showed much better protective
performance compared with polyurethane top coated coating system.
Life cycle cost is expected to be reduced by adopting the fluoro-
polymer. We suggest we should focus on the importance of top coat
durability in coating systems. 25