Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By
Dr. R.V. Ranganath
BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore-19
rvranganath.civ@bmsce.ac.in
Outcomes Based Education
Outcomes based education (OBE) is a process that
involves the restructuring of curriculum, assessment and
reporting practices in education to reflect the achievement
of high order learning and mastery rather than the
accumulation of course credits” (Tucker, 2004).
(http://www.slideshare.net/jellai09/obe-approaches?from_action=save)
Why Outcome Based Accreditation
Globalization has brought in a clear shift from education
as transmission of expert knowledge to education as
building learner competencies including learning to learn
and life long learning.
Faculty Contributions
Continuous Improvement
(Education)
(Curriculum)
(Learning &
Teaching)
(Assessment)
The OBE Framework
PO
CO
Administrative System for Implementation
of OBE
Course Coordinator
Module Coordinator
Programme Coordinator
Vision:
To emerge as one of the nation’s finest Institutions in the field of
Technical Education and Research through focused, effective and
sustained monitoring of its programmes and resources.
Mission:
To develop high quality professionals ingrained in ethics, wisdom
and creativity for the betterment of the society.
Corrected Vision and Mission Statements
Vision:.
To emerge as one of the nation’s finest Institutions of higher
learning in the field of Technical Education to develop
professionals who are technically competent, ethical,
environment friendly for betterment of society.
Mission:
Accomplish stimulating learning environment for students
through quality teaching, research and outreach activity by
providing state of the art facilities, industry exposure and
guidance of dedicated faculty
Department Vision and Mission Statements
(Sample)
Vision:
To be an excellent centre for imparting quality higher education in
Civil Engineering for a constantly changing societal needs with
credibility, integrity and ethical standards.
Mission:
Accomplish excellence in curricular, co-curricular activities with
a committed faculty through teaching and research which creates
technically competent and dedicated civil engineers to serve their
surroundings with pride.
Program Educational Objective-PEO
The educational objectives of an engineering degree
program are the statements that describe the expected
achievements of graduates in their career, and also in
particular, what the graduates are expected to perform
and achieve during the first few years after graduation.
The PEOs, may be guided by global and local needs,
vision of the Institution, long term goals etc.
For defining the PEOs the faculty members of the
program must continuously work with all
Stakeholders: Local Employers, Industry, Students and
the Alumni
PEOs (Samples)
PEO1:
Graduate will compete on a global platform to pursue their
professional career in Electrical Engineering and allied
disciplines.
PEO2:
Graduates will pursue higher education and/or engage in
continuous up gradation of their professional skills.
PEO3:
Graduate will communicate effectively and will demonstrate
professional behaviour while working in diverse team.
PEO4:
Graduates will demonstrate concern for society and environment.
(Samples 2 - Civil Engineering)
PEO1:
Practice civil engineering in construction industry, public sector
undertaking and as an entrepreneur for successful professional
career.
PEO2:
Pursue higher education for professional development
PEO3:
Exhibit leadership qualities with demonstrable attributes in
lifelong learning to contribute to the societal needs.
Processes for PEOs
PO2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze
complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first
principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Bloom’s Program
Levels Outcomes
Remember
(K1)
Understand
(K2)
Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics,
Apply
Apply (K3) science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering
Knowledge specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems
PO/Course PO/
Assessment Tool Course Assessment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Types Tool
Tests √ √ √ √
Assignments √ √
√ √ √ √ √ √
Direct Tools
Lab/Seminars/Industri
al Training/ Projects √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
(Rubrics)
Course End Survey √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Exit Survey √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Indirect Tools Faculty Survey √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Alumni Survey √ √ √
Programme Statistics √ √ √ √ √ √
CO-PO Relationship
Example Situation 1:
Example Situation 2:
CO3: Able to apply mix proportion principles to design a concrete mix for
field applications.
Example Situation 3:
CO3: Able to analyse characteristics of mix constituents and
design a concrete mix for field applications.
CO CO Decription T1 T2 A1 A2 LAB
Identify constituent of concrete
material characteristics and
CO1 different types of concrete for their - - - -
appropriate use in construction. [K Q1.a, b,
2](PO1) Q2 a,b
Compare behaviour of
concrete properties with
CO2 A1 - - -
known materials for design
applications(PO2, PO3)
Max Marks 10 10 10 10 40 5 5
SCORES OR GRADING
BASED ON SCALE OF 3
SCORES OR GRADING
BASED ON SCALE OF 3
TOTAL MARKS ATTEMPTED
PERCENT, %
Course Outcomes CO1 CO2
TOTAL OBTAINED
TOTAL OBTAINED
Assignment-
USN Name T1-Q1.a T1-Q1.b T1-Q2.a T1-Q2.b
1
SCORES OR
SCALE OF 3
BASED ON
GRADING
ATTEMPTED
OBTAINED
CO3
MARKS
TOTAL
TOTAL
T1-Q3.a T1-Q3.b T2-Q2.a T2-Q2.b
8 7 15 20 75.00% 3 Y
5 12 17 20 85.00% 3 Y
6 8 8 5 27 40 67.50% 2
9 9 10 90.00% 3 Y
9 9 18 20 90.00% 3 Y
- - - - 0 40 0.00% 1
- - - - 0 40 0.00% 1
8 8 16 20 80.00% 3 Y
8 8 16 20 80.00% 3 Y
6 8 14 20 70.00% 3 Y
7 7 14 20 70.00% 3 Y
- - - - 0 40 0.00% 1
8 9 8 7 32 40 80.00% 3 Y
9 9 18 20 90.00% 3 Y
5 6 11 20 55.00% 2
9 8 8 8 33 40 82.50% 3 Y
7 8 8 23 30 76.67% 3 Y
8 9 17 20 85.00% 3 Y
SUM 46 13
TARGET is > = More than 75% of Students Must Achieve 70% Marks.
3 Strongly Related
PO AND CO
2 Moderate
SCALE
1 Low
NUMBER OF
STUDENTS
SCORING > =70%
COURSE % OF STUDENTS
CO RESULT
OUTCOMES ACHIEVED CO
CO1 77.78% Y
CO2 77.78% Y
CO3 72.22% N
CO4 55.56% N
Example of CO-attainment for a course
COURSE OUTCOMES GRADING AVG ON DISTRIBUTION %
SCALE OF 3
3 2 1
CO1 2.78 77.78% 22.22% 0.00%
CO2 2.78 77.78% 22.22% 0.00%
CO3 2.56 72.22% 11.11% 16.67%
CO4 2.56 55.56% 44.44% 0.00%
2.75
AVERAGE GRADING
2.70
2.65
CO1
2.60
CO2
2.55 CO3
2.50 CO4
2.45
2.40
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4
COURSE OUTCOME
CO Attainment
The assessments should be in alignment with the COs
Question paper should be so set to assess all COs
The average marks obtained in assessments against items
for each CO will indicate the CO attainment.
Instructors can set targets for each CO of his/her course.
Attainment gaps can therefore be identified.
Instructor can plan to reduce the attainment gaps or
enhance attainment targets.
PO Attainment – Example..
Attainment of Pos:
CO
CO PO
Course Name COs Attainment, PO1 PO2 PO3 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Result 4
%
CO1 86.00% YES 86% 86% - - - - - - - - - -
Analysis of Structures-II
CO2 78.00% YES 78% 78% - - - - - - - - - -
55.56% NO - - - - - - - - - - - -
CO4
CO3 68.00% NO - - - - - - - - - - - -
Contd…
CO
CO
Course Name COs Attainment, PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Result
%
CO4 24.00% NO - - - - - - - - - - - -
Alternate
CO2 75.00% YES 75% - - - - 75% - - - 75%
Building
Materials &
CO3 75.00% YES - - - - 75% - - - 50%
Technology
75.00% YES 75% - 50% - 50% 75% - - - -
CO4
100
CO1 100.00% YES - - - - - - - 100% - - -
%
CO2 100.00% YES 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - 100% 100% - - 100%
Major Project
Phase - II
CO3 100.00% YES - - - - 100% - - - 100% - - -
100
YES - - - - - - - - 100% 67% -
CO4 100.00% %
PO
71
Attain 80% 78% 72% 84% 72% 83% 69% 98% 84% 67% 82%
%
ment
Example Weightages for PO Attainment
Dire
ct Stude
Direct Cours Facu
Asse nt
Assess e End lty
Method of Assessment ssme Exit PO
PO ment Surve Surv
nt Surve Attain
No (SEE) y ey
(CIE y ment,
.
) %
61