Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Lecture 7:
Financial Analysis of Renewable Energy Projects
Prof. Ram M. Shrestha
School of Environment, Resources and Development
Asian Institute of Technology
Thailand
E-mail: ram@ait.ac.th
1
21 June 2007
- Scenario Analysis
2
Biomass Energy
Electricity 25 - 80 900 - 3,000 5 – 15 ¢/kWh 4 – 10 ¢/kWh
Heat 25 - 80 250 - 750 1 – 5 ¢/kWh 1 – 5 ¢/kWh
Ethanol 8 – 25 $/GJ 6 – 10 $/GJ
Wind Electricity 20 - 30 1,100 – 1,700 5 – 13 ¢/kWh 3 – 10 ¢/kWh
e-learning course
Appraisal
Negotiation/Approval
Implementation, and
Evaluation.
• Fixed Cost (FC): Group of costs whose value will remain relatively
constant throughout the range of operational activity or output level
of the project. FC includes the following cost items:
- maintenance
- insurance
- lease rentals
- interest payment on invested capital
- certain administrative expense, and
- research.
- materials,
- fuel cost*
- tax
*Biomass cost in the case of biomass energy
projects; none in solar, wind and hydro.
10
- Carbon credits
(if the project is eligible for such benefits, e.g., under the clean
development mechanism (CDM); in the case of a biomass project, such
credits can be available only if biomass is produced on a sustainable basis)
A RE investment tax credit is an immediate reduction in income tax equal
to a percentage of the installed cost of a new RE investment. Tax credits
for renewable energy technologies (RETs) can enhance after-tax cash flow
and promote RE investment.
Often, governments may also provide subsidy on the cost of RETs
equipments to promote RE.
11
Investm ent
Decision
12
17
A = P [i(1+i)n]/[(1+i)n-1]
That is, A = P x CRF
Where, CRF= capital recovery factor = [i(1+i)n]/[(1+i)n-1]
P = A x Annuity factor
where, Annuity factor = 1/CRF
19
Years
1 2 3 4 5 6
0
A A A A A A
1. Determine the interest rate that the firm wishes to earn on its
investments. This interest rate is often referred to as either a
required rate of return or a minimum attractive rate of return
(MARR).
3. Estimate the cash inflow for each period over the project’s
service life.
4. Estimate the cash outflow over each service period.
5. Determine the net cash flows:
net cash flow = cash inflow – cash outflow
6. Find the present worth of each year’s net cash flow at the
MARR.
7. Add up all the present worth figures during the service life of the
project. The sum so obtained is the project’s NPW.
22
where, i = MARR.
23
To compute AE, first of all we have to find the net present worth
e-learning course
(NPW) of the original series and then multiply this amount by the
capital recovery factor.
The decision rule is as follows:
• If AE(i) > 0, accept the project for investment.
• If AE(i) = 0, remain indifferent to the investment.
• If AE(i) < 0, reject the project for investment.
Note that, accepting a project that has a positive AE(i) is equivalent to
accepting a project that has a positive PW(i).
24
25
26
A
Annual Benefit = 1000000 + 250000
+ 350000 + 100000
Initial cost $ 25
= $ 1700000
e-learning course
costs:
Then,
Present value of operating and maintenance cost = 200000 * 18.2559
= $ 3651180
Total cost (C) = 25000000+ 3651180
Power Sales
B/C ratio = 31035030 / (3651180 + 25000000) = 1.08
Since the B/C ratio is greater then unity, the project is accepted! $ 10 27
managers.
Drawbacks
- It tells the analyst nothing about the project earning rate after the
payback period and does not consider the total profitability or size of
the project.
If the subsidy amount is not given then we can exclude the subsidy
amount in the above example.
29
Sensitivity Analysis
Scenario Analysis
Investment
Decision
30
of risk.
For example, the demand may not turn out to be as estimated, the tariff
is lower than expected, project execution may take more time and
involve more cost than planned.
such as:
• Sensitivity Analysis
• Break-Even Analysis
• Scenario Analysis
32
35
90000
80000
70000
Unit Price
e-learning course
60000
NPW (15%)
Demand
50000
Variable Cos t
40000
Fixed Cost
30000
Salvage Value
20000
10000
0
-20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
De viation
Figure 1: Sensitivity Graph 36
Figure 2 shows the plot of the PWs of cash inflows and outflows
under various assumptions about annual sales. The two lines
crosses when sales are X1 units, the point at which the project has
a zero NPW. It is seen that as long as the sales are greater or
equal to X1 units the project has a positive NPW.
37
NPW
(MARR %)
Inflow
Profit
Break - even point
e-learning course
Outflow
Y2
Loss
X1 units
Y1
X1 38
The worst-case scenario is the analysis with less favorable values such as
low unit sales, low unit price, high variable cost per unit, high fixed cost etc.
The most-likely-case scenario (base case) is the analysis with the most
likely inputs and outputs from the point of view of the project evaluator.
e-learning course
The NPW under the worst and the best conditions are then calculated and
compared with the expected, or the base case, NPW.
Generally, we find that the worst case produces a negative NPW, the best
case produces a large positive NPW and the most likely case produces a
positive NPW.
But still by only observing all these results, it is not possible and easy to
interpret the scenario analysis or make a decision based on it.
Clearly, we need estimates of the probabilities of occurrence of the worst
case, the best case and the most likely or base case and all the other
possibilities. 40
conducted.
41
42
44
Thank you!
45